辅助化疗六种药物(阿霉素、甲氨蝶呤、顺铂、博来霉素、环磷酰胺和放线菌素)治疗四肢非转移性高级别骨肉瘤。结果32例患者与127例患者在新辅助形式下同时使用相同药物的比较。

M Avella, G Bacci, D J McDonald, M Di Scioscio, P Picci, M Campanacci
{"title":"辅助化疗六种药物(阿霉素、甲氨蝶呤、顺铂、博来霉素、环磷酰胺和放线菌素)治疗四肢非转移性高级别骨肉瘤。结果32例患者与127例患者在新辅助形式下同时使用相同药物的比较。","authors":"M Avella,&nbsp;G Bacci,&nbsp;D J McDonald,&nbsp;M Di Scioscio,&nbsp;P Picci,&nbsp;M Campanacci","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Between March, 1983 and June, 1986, 32 patients with localized high grade osteosarcoma of the extremities who refused chemotherapy before surgery (neoadjuvant chemotherapy), were immediately operated on and treated with a protocol of adjuvant chemotherapy. This was performed with adriamycin, methotrexate, cisplatinum, bleomycin, cyclophosphamide and dactinomycin. At a median follow-up of 40 months (12-57), 20 patients (63%) remained continuously disease-free. These results appear to be better than the results achieved in our institution in 108 patients treated between 1980 and 1982 with an adjuvant chemotherapy protocol in which only adriamycin and methotrexate were employed. They also seem comparable to the results obtained in 127 contemporary patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in which the same drugs were used (methotrexate i.v., cisplatinum i.a. preoperatively; adriamycin- methotrexate- cisplatinum or adriamycin -bleomycin -cyclophosphamide-dactinomycin postoperatively, depending on the degree of necrosis achieved by preoperative treatment). These data seem to indicate that the improved survival with neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared to a previous group of patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy may be related to the improved effectiveness of the agents used rather than the sequence of treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9733,"journal":{"name":"Chemioterapia : international journal of the Mediterranean Society of Chemotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adjuvant chemotherapy with six drugs (adriamycin, methotrexate, cisplatinum, bleomycin, cyclophosphamide and dactinomycin) for non-metastatic high grade osteosarcoma of the extremities. Results of 32 patients and comparison to 127 patients concomitantly treated with the same drugs in a neoadjuvant form.\",\"authors\":\"M Avella,&nbsp;G Bacci,&nbsp;D J McDonald,&nbsp;M Di Scioscio,&nbsp;P Picci,&nbsp;M Campanacci\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Between March, 1983 and June, 1986, 32 patients with localized high grade osteosarcoma of the extremities who refused chemotherapy before surgery (neoadjuvant chemotherapy), were immediately operated on and treated with a protocol of adjuvant chemotherapy. This was performed with adriamycin, methotrexate, cisplatinum, bleomycin, cyclophosphamide and dactinomycin. At a median follow-up of 40 months (12-57), 20 patients (63%) remained continuously disease-free. These results appear to be better than the results achieved in our institution in 108 patients treated between 1980 and 1982 with an adjuvant chemotherapy protocol in which only adriamycin and methotrexate were employed. They also seem comparable to the results obtained in 127 contemporary patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in which the same drugs were used (methotrexate i.v., cisplatinum i.a. preoperatively; adriamycin- methotrexate- cisplatinum or adriamycin -bleomycin -cyclophosphamide-dactinomycin postoperatively, depending on the degree of necrosis achieved by preoperative treatment). These data seem to indicate that the improved survival with neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared to a previous group of patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy may be related to the improved effectiveness of the agents used rather than the sequence of treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemioterapia : international journal of the Mediterranean Society of Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemioterapia : international journal of the Mediterranean Society of Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemioterapia : international journal of the Mediterranean Society of Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1983年3月至1986年6月,32例肢体局部高级别骨肉瘤患者术前拒绝化疗(新辅助化疗),立即进行手术并接受辅助化疗方案治疗。用阿霉素、甲氨蝶呤、顺铂、博来霉素、环磷酰胺和放线菌素进行。在中位随访40个月(12-57)时,20名患者(63%)持续无病。这些结果似乎比我们机构在1980年至1982年期间仅使用阿霉素和甲氨蝶呤的辅助化疗方案治疗的108例患者的结果要好。它们似乎也与127名接受新辅助化疗的当代患者的结果相当,这些患者使用相同的药物(术前静脉注射甲氨蝶呤,顺铂;术后阿霉素-甲氨蝶呤-顺铂或阿霉素-博来霉素-环磷酰胺-放线菌素,取决于术前治疗的坏死程度)。这些数据似乎表明,与前一组接受辅助化疗的患者相比,新辅助化疗的生存率提高可能与所用药物的有效性提高有关,而不是与治疗顺序有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adjuvant chemotherapy with six drugs (adriamycin, methotrexate, cisplatinum, bleomycin, cyclophosphamide and dactinomycin) for non-metastatic high grade osteosarcoma of the extremities. Results of 32 patients and comparison to 127 patients concomitantly treated with the same drugs in a neoadjuvant form.

Between March, 1983 and June, 1986, 32 patients with localized high grade osteosarcoma of the extremities who refused chemotherapy before surgery (neoadjuvant chemotherapy), were immediately operated on and treated with a protocol of adjuvant chemotherapy. This was performed with adriamycin, methotrexate, cisplatinum, bleomycin, cyclophosphamide and dactinomycin. At a median follow-up of 40 months (12-57), 20 patients (63%) remained continuously disease-free. These results appear to be better than the results achieved in our institution in 108 patients treated between 1980 and 1982 with an adjuvant chemotherapy protocol in which only adriamycin and methotrexate were employed. They also seem comparable to the results obtained in 127 contemporary patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in which the same drugs were used (methotrexate i.v., cisplatinum i.a. preoperatively; adriamycin- methotrexate- cisplatinum or adriamycin -bleomycin -cyclophosphamide-dactinomycin postoperatively, depending on the degree of necrosis achieved by preoperative treatment). These data seem to indicate that the improved survival with neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared to a previous group of patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy may be related to the improved effectiveness of the agents used rather than the sequence of treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信