晶状体厚度对健康眼调节范围的影响。

IF 2.2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Louise Vermeulen, Carina Koppen, Luc Van Os, Barbara K Pierscionek, Jos J Rozema
{"title":"晶状体厚度对健康眼调节范围的影响。","authors":"Louise Vermeulen, Carina Koppen, Luc Van Os, Barbara K Pierscionek, Jos J Rozema","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2024.100528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The maximum accommodative range is a useful indication of visual function. It decreases with age, but the exact cause of this decrease is not fully understood. It is associated with the increasing rigidity of the lens and changes to the lens shape, as well as the geometry of the zonular attachments. This work aims to determine the relationship between the accommodative range and lens shape in a group of healthy young adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study includes 40 emmetropic participants between 20 and 30 years of age. They filled in a questionnaire and underwent accommodation measurements using the RAF Convergence Rule and the Negative Lens Test. After a drop of Tropicamide 0.5 % and Cyclopentolate 1 %, participants underwent measurements with autorefractor, Scheimpflug tomography (Pentacam HR, Oculus), anterior segment Optical Coherence Tomography and optical biometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The accommodative range did not correlate significantly (p>0.05) with any of the lenticular or ocular parameters considered, such as lens thickness, lens radii of curvature, axial length, or corneal power.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The crystalline lens shape does not affect the accommodative range of the eye. This may be due to the smaller deformation required to bring a thicker lens to the same level of accommodation as a thinner lens. The amount of force on the zonular fibres may therefore be similar, in all lenses, regardless of the lens shape.</p>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"18 1","pages":"100528"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11760814/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of lens thickness on the accommodative range in healthy eyes.\",\"authors\":\"Louise Vermeulen, Carina Koppen, Luc Van Os, Barbara K Pierscionek, Jos J Rozema\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.optom.2024.100528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The maximum accommodative range is a useful indication of visual function. It decreases with age, but the exact cause of this decrease is not fully understood. It is associated with the increasing rigidity of the lens and changes to the lens shape, as well as the geometry of the zonular attachments. This work aims to determine the relationship between the accommodative range and lens shape in a group of healthy young adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study includes 40 emmetropic participants between 20 and 30 years of age. They filled in a questionnaire and underwent accommodation measurements using the RAF Convergence Rule and the Negative Lens Test. After a drop of Tropicamide 0.5 % and Cyclopentolate 1 %, participants underwent measurements with autorefractor, Scheimpflug tomography (Pentacam HR, Oculus), anterior segment Optical Coherence Tomography and optical biometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The accommodative range did not correlate significantly (p>0.05) with any of the lenticular or ocular parameters considered, such as lens thickness, lens radii of curvature, axial length, or corneal power.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The crystalline lens shape does not affect the accommodative range of the eye. This may be due to the smaller deformation required to bring a thicker lens to the same level of accommodation as a thinner lens. The amount of force on the zonular fibres may therefore be similar, in all lenses, regardless of the lens shape.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Optometry\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"100528\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11760814/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Optometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2024.100528\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2024.100528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:最大调节范围是一种有用的视觉功能指标。它随着年龄的增长而减少,但这种减少的确切原因尚不完全清楚。它与晶状体的刚性增加和晶状体形状的变化以及带状附件的几何形状有关。这项工作旨在确定一组健康的年轻人的调节范围和晶状体形状之间的关系。方法:本研究包括40名年龄在20 - 30岁之间的非斜视患者。他们填写了一份调查问卷,并使用RAF收敛规则和负透镜测试进行了适应性测量。在滴入0.5%的Tropicamide和1%的Cyclopentolate后,参与者接受了自折射仪、Scheimpflug断层扫描(Pentacam HR, Oculus)、前段光学相干断层扫描和光学生物测量。结果:调节范围与晶状体或眼参数,如晶状体厚度、晶状体曲率半径、晶状体轴长或角膜度数均无显著相关性(p>0.05)。结论:晶状体的形状不影响眼睛的调节范围。这可能是由于使较厚的透镜达到与较薄透镜相同的调节水平所需的较小变形。因此,无论晶状体的形状如何,所有的晶状体对带状纤维的作用力都是相似的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of lens thickness on the accommodative range in healthy eyes.

Background: The maximum accommodative range is a useful indication of visual function. It decreases with age, but the exact cause of this decrease is not fully understood. It is associated with the increasing rigidity of the lens and changes to the lens shape, as well as the geometry of the zonular attachments. This work aims to determine the relationship between the accommodative range and lens shape in a group of healthy young adults.

Methods: This study includes 40 emmetropic participants between 20 and 30 years of age. They filled in a questionnaire and underwent accommodation measurements using the RAF Convergence Rule and the Negative Lens Test. After a drop of Tropicamide 0.5 % and Cyclopentolate 1 %, participants underwent measurements with autorefractor, Scheimpflug tomography (Pentacam HR, Oculus), anterior segment Optical Coherence Tomography and optical biometry.

Results: The accommodative range did not correlate significantly (p>0.05) with any of the lenticular or ocular parameters considered, such as lens thickness, lens radii of curvature, axial length, or corneal power.

Conclusion: The crystalline lens shape does not affect the accommodative range of the eye. This may be due to the smaller deformation required to bring a thicker lens to the same level of accommodation as a thinner lens. The amount of force on the zonular fibres may therefore be similar, in all lenses, regardless of the lens shape.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Optometry
Journal of Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信