Sujin Kim, Seung Woo Song, Haesung Lee, Chun Sung Byun, Ji-Hyoung Park
{"title":"一项随机对照试验:扑热息痛不能改善视频胸腔镜手术后局部阻滞的镇痛效果。","authors":"Sujin Kim, Seung Woo Song, Haesung Lee, Chun Sung Byun, Ji-Hyoung Park","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-02888-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Various analgesic techniques have been applied, the pain after video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is still challenging for anesthesiologists. Paracetamol provide analgesic efficacy in many surgeries. However, clinical evidence in the lung surgery with regional block remain limited. This monocentric double-blind randomized controlled trial investigates the efficacy of paracetamol after VATS with regional block.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 90 patients were randomized to receive paracetamol (1 g) or normal saline. Erector Spinae Plane Block and Intercostal Nerve block were applied during the surgery. The Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) pain score was measured in the PACU as well as 6, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. And the total dose of rescue analgesics administered to patients in morphine milligram equivalents (MME), satisfaction score, length of hospital stays, and incidence of nausea and vomiting were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The VAS pain score at each time point, the primary endpoint, did not differ between the groups (3.09 ± 2.14 vs. 2.53 ± 1.67, p = 0.174 at PACU; 4.56 ± 2.80 vs. 4.06 ± 2.46, p = 0.368 at 6 h; 3.07 ± 1.98 vs. 3.44 ± 2.48, p = 0.427 at 12 h; 2.10 ± 2.00 vs. 2.49 ± 2.07, p = 0.368 at 24 h; and 1.93 ± 1.76 vs. 2.39 ± 1.97, p = 0.251 at 48 h postoperatively). Satisfaction scores (4.37 ± 0.76 vs. 4.14 ± 0.88, p = 0.201), nausea (35.6% vs. 37.8%, p = 0.827), hypotension (2.2% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.317), and bradycardia (6.7% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.309) were also reported at similar rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The analgesic efficacy of one gram of paracetamol with ESPB and ICNB after VATS was not proven. Thus, caution should be exercised when prescribing paracetamol for pain control during VATS.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>this trial was registered on Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS), Republic of Korea (KCT0008710). Registration date: 17/08/2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706059/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paracetamol did not improve the analgesic efficacy with regional block after video assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sujin Kim, Seung Woo Song, Haesung Lee, Chun Sung Byun, Ji-Hyoung Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12871-025-02888-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Various analgesic techniques have been applied, the pain after video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is still challenging for anesthesiologists. Paracetamol provide analgesic efficacy in many surgeries. However, clinical evidence in the lung surgery with regional block remain limited. This monocentric double-blind randomized controlled trial investigates the efficacy of paracetamol after VATS with regional block.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 90 patients were randomized to receive paracetamol (1 g) or normal saline. Erector Spinae Plane Block and Intercostal Nerve block were applied during the surgery. The Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) pain score was measured in the PACU as well as 6, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. And the total dose of rescue analgesics administered to patients in morphine milligram equivalents (MME), satisfaction score, length of hospital stays, and incidence of nausea and vomiting were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The VAS pain score at each time point, the primary endpoint, did not differ between the groups (3.09 ± 2.14 vs. 2.53 ± 1.67, p = 0.174 at PACU; 4.56 ± 2.80 vs. 4.06 ± 2.46, p = 0.368 at 6 h; 3.07 ± 1.98 vs. 3.44 ± 2.48, p = 0.427 at 12 h; 2.10 ± 2.00 vs. 2.49 ± 2.07, p = 0.368 at 24 h; and 1.93 ± 1.76 vs. 2.39 ± 1.97, p = 0.251 at 48 h postoperatively). Satisfaction scores (4.37 ± 0.76 vs. 4.14 ± 0.88, p = 0.201), nausea (35.6% vs. 37.8%, p = 0.827), hypotension (2.2% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.317), and bradycardia (6.7% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.309) were also reported at similar rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The analgesic efficacy of one gram of paracetamol with ESPB and ICNB after VATS was not proven. Thus, caution should be exercised when prescribing paracetamol for pain control during VATS.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>this trial was registered on Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS), Republic of Korea (KCT0008710). Registration date: 17/08/2023.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706059/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02888-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02888-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:虽然应用了多种镇痛技术,但视像胸外科手术(VATS)后的疼痛仍然是麻醉师面临的挑战。扑热息痛在许多手术中都有止痛效果。然而,区域性阻滞肺手术的临床证据仍然有限。本单中心双盲随机对照试验探讨了局部阻滞VATS后扑热息痛的疗效。方法:90例患者随机接受扑热息痛(1 g)或生理盐水治疗。术中应用竖脊肌平面阻滞和肋间神经阻滞。在PACU及术后6、12、24、48 h分别测量视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分。并记录患者抢救镇痛药的总剂量(吗啡毫克当量)、满意度评分、住院时间、恶心呕吐发生率。结果:各组间主要终点VAS疼痛评分(PACU为3.09±2.14∶2.53±1.67,p = 0.174)无显著差异;4.56±2.80 vs. 4.06±2.46,p = 0.368;12 h时3.07±1.98 vs. 3.44±2.48,p = 0.427;2.10±2.00 vs. 2.49±2.07,p = 0.368;术后48 h(1.93±1.76比2.39±1.97,p = 0.251)。满意度评分(4.37±0.76比4.14±0.88,p = 0.201)、恶心(35.6%比37.8%,p = 0.827)、低血压(2.2%比0.0%,p = 0.317)和心动过缓(6.7%比2.2%,p = 0.309)的报告率也相似。结论:1克扑热息痛联合ESPB和ICNB在VATS术后的镇痛效果尚未得到证实。因此,在VATS期间处方扑热息痛以控制疼痛时应谨慎行事。试验注册:本试验已在韩国临床研究信息服务(CRIS)注册(KCT0008710)。报名日期:2023年8月17日。
Paracetamol did not improve the analgesic efficacy with regional block after video assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial.
Background: Various analgesic techniques have been applied, the pain after video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is still challenging for anesthesiologists. Paracetamol provide analgesic efficacy in many surgeries. However, clinical evidence in the lung surgery with regional block remain limited. This monocentric double-blind randomized controlled trial investigates the efficacy of paracetamol after VATS with regional block.
Methods: A total of 90 patients were randomized to receive paracetamol (1 g) or normal saline. Erector Spinae Plane Block and Intercostal Nerve block were applied during the surgery. The Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) pain score was measured in the PACU as well as 6, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. And the total dose of rescue analgesics administered to patients in morphine milligram equivalents (MME), satisfaction score, length of hospital stays, and incidence of nausea and vomiting were also recorded.
Results: The VAS pain score at each time point, the primary endpoint, did not differ between the groups (3.09 ± 2.14 vs. 2.53 ± 1.67, p = 0.174 at PACU; 4.56 ± 2.80 vs. 4.06 ± 2.46, p = 0.368 at 6 h; 3.07 ± 1.98 vs. 3.44 ± 2.48, p = 0.427 at 12 h; 2.10 ± 2.00 vs. 2.49 ± 2.07, p = 0.368 at 24 h; and 1.93 ± 1.76 vs. 2.39 ± 1.97, p = 0.251 at 48 h postoperatively). Satisfaction scores (4.37 ± 0.76 vs. 4.14 ± 0.88, p = 0.201), nausea (35.6% vs. 37.8%, p = 0.827), hypotension (2.2% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.317), and bradycardia (6.7% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.309) were also reported at similar rates.
Conclusions: The analgesic efficacy of one gram of paracetamol with ESPB and ICNB after VATS was not proven. Thus, caution should be exercised when prescribing paracetamol for pain control during VATS.
Trial registration: this trial was registered on Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS), Republic of Korea (KCT0008710). Registration date: 17/08/2023.
期刊介绍:
BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.