关节镜下不同股骨隧道位置单束前交叉韧带重建的主观功能结果。

Q4 Medicine
Xiao-Han Zhang, Yi Qian, Chen He, Qi Gao, Feng Gao, Jing-Bin Zhou
{"title":"关节镜下不同股骨隧道位置单束前交叉韧带重建的主观功能结果。","authors":"Xiao-Han Zhang, Yi Qian, Chen He, Qi Gao, Feng Gao, Jing-Bin Zhou","doi":"10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.16111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective To compare the five-year subjective functional outcomes of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with three different femoral tunnel positions under arthroscopic guidance. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on the clinical data of 165 patients who underwent ACLR at the Department of Sports Traumatology,Sports Hospital,National Institute of Sports Medicine,General Administration of Sport of China from January 2012 to December 2017.According to femoral tunnel positions,the patients were assigned into three groups of low centre (LC)section (<i>n</i>=53),high centre (HC) section (<i>n</i>=45),and high anterior medial (HAM) section (<i>n</i>=67).The three groups were compared before and 5 years after surgery regarding the following items:international knee documentation committee(IKDC) score,Lysholm score,and ACL-return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) scale score. Results All patients were followed up for 57-64 months [(60.2±1.52) months].The IKDC scores in the LC,HC,and HAM groups 5 years after surgery were 80.80±10.82,77.36±14.36,and 85.33±7.42,respectively,and the scores were higher than those before surgery (all <i>P</i>=0.002).The HAM group had higher IKDC score than the LC and HC groups 5 years after surgery (<i>P</i>=0.022,<i>P</i>=0.008).The Lysholm scores in the LC,HC,and HAM groups 5 years after surgery were 80.87±10.83,77.67±15.23,and 86.10±7.68,respectively,which were higher than those before surgery (all <i>P</i>=0.002).Moreover,the HAM group had higher Lysholm score than the LC and HC groups (<i>P</i>=0.020,<i>P</i>=0.022).The ACL-RSI scores in the LC,HC,and HAM groups 5 years after surgery were 70.39±17.26,73.58±16.81,and 83.73±11.10,respectively,and the score was higher in the HAM group than in the LC and HC groups (<i>P</i>=0.014,<i>P</i>=0.038). Conclusions The ACL patients treated by ACLR with the HAM section had better rotational stability and subjective function 5 years after surgery.Therefore,we recommend the HAM section as the preferred femoral tunnel position in ACL reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":6919,"journal":{"name":"中国医学科学院学报","volume":"46 6","pages":"823-827"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subjective Functional Outcomes of Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Different Femoral Tunnel Positions <i>via</i> Arthroscopy.\",\"authors\":\"Xiao-Han Zhang, Yi Qian, Chen He, Qi Gao, Feng Gao, Jing-Bin Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.16111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objective To compare the five-year subjective functional outcomes of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with three different femoral tunnel positions under arthroscopic guidance. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on the clinical data of 165 patients who underwent ACLR at the Department of Sports Traumatology,Sports Hospital,National Institute of Sports Medicine,General Administration of Sport of China from January 2012 to December 2017.According to femoral tunnel positions,the patients were assigned into three groups of low centre (LC)section (<i>n</i>=53),high centre (HC) section (<i>n</i>=45),and high anterior medial (HAM) section (<i>n</i>=67).The three groups were compared before and 5 years after surgery regarding the following items:international knee documentation committee(IKDC) score,Lysholm score,and ACL-return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) scale score. Results All patients were followed up for 57-64 months [(60.2±1.52) months].The IKDC scores in the LC,HC,and HAM groups 5 years after surgery were 80.80±10.82,77.36±14.36,and 85.33±7.42,respectively,and the scores were higher than those before surgery (all <i>P</i>=0.002).The HAM group had higher IKDC score than the LC and HC groups 5 years after surgery (<i>P</i>=0.022,<i>P</i>=0.008).The Lysholm scores in the LC,HC,and HAM groups 5 years after surgery were 80.87±10.83,77.67±15.23,and 86.10±7.68,respectively,which were higher than those before surgery (all <i>P</i>=0.002).Moreover,the HAM group had higher Lysholm score than the LC and HC groups (<i>P</i>=0.020,<i>P</i>=0.022).The ACL-RSI scores in the LC,HC,and HAM groups 5 years after surgery were 70.39±17.26,73.58±16.81,and 83.73±11.10,respectively,and the score was higher in the HAM group than in the LC and HC groups (<i>P</i>=0.014,<i>P</i>=0.038). Conclusions The ACL patients treated by ACLR with the HAM section had better rotational stability and subjective function 5 years after surgery.Therefore,we recommend the HAM section as the preferred femoral tunnel position in ACL reconstruction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6919,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国医学科学院学报\",\"volume\":\"46 6\",\"pages\":\"823-827\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国医学科学院学报\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.16111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国医学科学院学报","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.16111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较关节镜引导下3种不同股骨隧道位置单束前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)术后5年的主观功能结果。方法回顾性分析2012年1月至2017年12月在国家体育总局国家运动医学研究所运动医院运动创伤科接受ACLR治疗的165例患者的临床资料。根据股骨隧道位置,将患者分为低中心(LC)组(n=53)、高中心(HC)组(n=45)和高前内侧(HAM)组(n=67)。比较三组患者术前和术后5年的以下项目:国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分、Lysholm评分和损伤后恢复运动(ACL-RSI)量表评分。结果所有患者随访57 ~ 64个月[(60.2±1.52)个月]。LC组、HC组、HAM组术后5年IKDC评分分别为80.80±10.82、77.36±14.36、85.33±7.42,均高于术前(P=0.002)。术后5年,HAM组IKDC评分高于LC组和HC组(P=0.022,P=0.008)。LC、HC、HAM组术后5年Lysholm评分分别为80.87±10.83、77.67±15.23、86.10±7.68,均高于术前(P=0.002)。HAM组Lysholm评分高于LC组和HC组(P=0.020,P=0.022)。LC、HC、HAM组术后5年的ACL-RSI评分分别为70.39±17.26、73.58±16.81、83.73±11.10,HAM组高于LC、HC组(P=0.014、P=0.038)。结论ACLR + HAM切片治疗前交叉韧带患者术后5年旋转稳定性和主观功能较好。因此,我们推荐将HAM段作为前交叉韧带重建的首选股骨隧道位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Subjective Functional Outcomes of Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Different Femoral Tunnel Positions via Arthroscopy.

Objective To compare the five-year subjective functional outcomes of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with three different femoral tunnel positions under arthroscopic guidance. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on the clinical data of 165 patients who underwent ACLR at the Department of Sports Traumatology,Sports Hospital,National Institute of Sports Medicine,General Administration of Sport of China from January 2012 to December 2017.According to femoral tunnel positions,the patients were assigned into three groups of low centre (LC)section (n=53),high centre (HC) section (n=45),and high anterior medial (HAM) section (n=67).The three groups were compared before and 5 years after surgery regarding the following items:international knee documentation committee(IKDC) score,Lysholm score,and ACL-return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) scale score. Results All patients were followed up for 57-64 months [(60.2±1.52) months].The IKDC scores in the LC,HC,and HAM groups 5 years after surgery were 80.80±10.82,77.36±14.36,and 85.33±7.42,respectively,and the scores were higher than those before surgery (all P=0.002).The HAM group had higher IKDC score than the LC and HC groups 5 years after surgery (P=0.022,P=0.008).The Lysholm scores in the LC,HC,and HAM groups 5 years after surgery were 80.87±10.83,77.67±15.23,and 86.10±7.68,respectively,which were higher than those before surgery (all P=0.002).Moreover,the HAM group had higher Lysholm score than the LC and HC groups (P=0.020,P=0.022).The ACL-RSI scores in the LC,HC,and HAM groups 5 years after surgery were 70.39±17.26,73.58±16.81,and 83.73±11.10,respectively,and the score was higher in the HAM group than in the LC and HC groups (P=0.014,P=0.038). Conclusions The ACL patients treated by ACLR with the HAM section had better rotational stability and subjective function 5 years after surgery.Therefore,we recommend the HAM section as the preferred femoral tunnel position in ACL reconstruction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中国医学科学院学报
中国医学科学院学报 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6813
期刊介绍: Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae was founded in February 1979. It is a comprehensive medical academic journal published in China and abroad, supervised by the Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China and sponsored by the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College. The journal mainly reports the latest research results, work progress and dynamics in the fields of basic medicine, clinical medicine, pharmacy, preventive medicine, biomedicine, medical teaching and research, aiming to promote the exchange of medical information and improve the academic level of medicine. At present, the journal has been included in 10 famous foreign retrieval systems and their databases [Medline (PubMed online version), Elsevier, EMBASE, CA, WPRIM, ExtraMED, IC, JST, UPD and EBSCO-ASP]; and has been included in important domestic retrieval systems and databases [China Science Citation Database (Documentation and Information Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences), China Core Journals Overview (Peking University Library), China Science and Technology Paper Statistical Source Database (China Science and Technology Core Journals) (China Institute of Scientific and Technological Information), China Science and Technology Journal Paper and Citation Database (China Institute of Scientific and Technological Information)].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信