比较基因组学的系统发育方法

IF 39.1 1区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Anna E. Dewar, Laurence. J. Belcher, Stuart A. West
{"title":"比较基因组学的系统发育方法","authors":"Anna E. Dewar, Laurence. J. Belcher, Stuart A. West","doi":"10.1038/s41576-024-00803-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Comparative genomics, whereby the genomes of different species are compared, has the potential to address broad and fundamental questions at the intersection of genetics and evolution. However, species, genomes and genes cannot be considered as independent data points within statistical tests. Closely related species tend to be similar because they share genes by common descent, which must be accounted for in analyses. This problem of non-independence may be exacerbated when examining genomes or genes but can be addressed by applying phylogeny-based methods to comparative genomic analyses. Here, we review how controlling for phylogeny can change the conclusions of comparative genomics studies. We address common questions on how to apply these methods and illustrate how they can be used to test causal hypotheses. The combination of rapidly expanding genomic datasets and phylogenetic comparative methods is set to revolutionize the biological insights possible from comparative genomic studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19067,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Genetics","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":39.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A phylogenetic approach to comparative genomics\",\"authors\":\"Anna E. Dewar, Laurence. J. Belcher, Stuart A. West\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41576-024-00803-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Comparative genomics, whereby the genomes of different species are compared, has the potential to address broad and fundamental questions at the intersection of genetics and evolution. However, species, genomes and genes cannot be considered as independent data points within statistical tests. Closely related species tend to be similar because they share genes by common descent, which must be accounted for in analyses. This problem of non-independence may be exacerbated when examining genomes or genes but can be addressed by applying phylogeny-based methods to comparative genomic analyses. Here, we review how controlling for phylogeny can change the conclusions of comparative genomics studies. We address common questions on how to apply these methods and illustrate how they can be used to test causal hypotheses. The combination of rapidly expanding genomic datasets and phylogenetic comparative methods is set to revolutionize the biological insights possible from comparative genomic studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Reviews Genetics\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":39.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Reviews Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-024-00803-0\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-024-00803-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过比较不同物种的基因组,比较基因组学有可能解决遗传学和进化交叉领域的广泛而基本的问题。然而,物种、基因组和基因不能被视为统计检验中的独立数据点。近亲物种往往是相似的,因为它们有共同的血统,这必须在分析中考虑到。当检查基因组或基因时,这种非独立性问题可能会加剧,但可以通过应用基于系统发育的方法进行比较基因组分析来解决。在这里,我们回顾了控制系统发育如何改变比较基因组学研究的结论。我们解决了如何应用这些方法的常见问题,并说明了如何使用它们来检验因果假设。快速扩展的基因组数据集和系统发育比较方法的结合将彻底改变比较基因组研究可能带来的生物学见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A phylogenetic approach to comparative genomics

A phylogenetic approach to comparative genomics

Comparative genomics, whereby the genomes of different species are compared, has the potential to address broad and fundamental questions at the intersection of genetics and evolution. However, species, genomes and genes cannot be considered as independent data points within statistical tests. Closely related species tend to be similar because they share genes by common descent, which must be accounted for in analyses. This problem of non-independence may be exacerbated when examining genomes or genes but can be addressed by applying phylogeny-based methods to comparative genomic analyses. Here, we review how controlling for phylogeny can change the conclusions of comparative genomics studies. We address common questions on how to apply these methods and illustrate how they can be used to test causal hypotheses. The combination of rapidly expanding genomic datasets and phylogenetic comparative methods is set to revolutionize the biological insights possible from comparative genomic studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Reviews Genetics
Nature Reviews Genetics 生物-遗传学
CiteScore
57.40
自引率
0.50%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: At Nature Reviews Genetics, our goal is to be the leading source of reviews and commentaries for the scientific communities we serve. We are dedicated to publishing authoritative articles that are easily accessible to our readers. We believe in enhancing our articles with clear and understandable figures, tables, and other display items. Our aim is to provide an unparalleled service to authors, referees, and readers, and we are committed to maximizing the usefulness and impact of each article we publish. Within our journal, we publish a range of content including Research Highlights, Comments, Reviews, and Perspectives that are relevant to geneticists and genomicists. With our broad scope, we ensure that the articles we publish reach the widest possible audience. As part of the Nature Reviews portfolio of journals, we strive to uphold the high standards and reputation associated with this esteemed collection of publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信