一项随机临床试验:正畸固定矫治器联合上颌切牙与犬咬涡轮矫治在调平和对准阶段的深咬成人牙弓尺寸变化

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Puttaporn Supanich, Udom Thongudomporn, Smorntree Viteporn
{"title":"一项随机临床试验:正畸固定矫治器联合上颌切牙与犬咬涡轮矫治在调平和对准阶段的深咬成人牙弓尺寸变化","authors":"Puttaporn Supanich, Udom Thongudomporn, Smorntree Viteporn","doi":"10.1007/s00784-024-06145-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This randomized clinical trial compared arch dimensional changes, dentoskeletal changes, and the rate of overbite correction in deep bite adults treated with fixed appliances and either maxillary incisor bite turbos (IBT) or canine bite turbos (CBT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty-six deep bite subjects treated with fixed appliances were randomized into IBT (n = 23) and CBT (n = 23) groups. Changes in intercanine width (ICW), arch height (AH), and Little's Irregularity Index (LII) were analyzed from before treatment (T<sub>0</sub>) to 3 months after aligning with 0.012\" NiTi archwires in both arches (T<sub>1</sub>). Cephalometric changes between T<sub>0</sub> and the visit when normal overbite was achieved (T<sub>2</sub>) were assessed. Within-group and between-group comparisons were analyzed at a significance level of 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both groups, mandibular ICW, and maxillary and mandibular AH significantly increased while maxillary and mandibular LII decreased. Maxillary and mandibular incisor proclination and molar extrusion were observed. The IBT group showed significantly greater changes in mandibular ICW, maxillary and mandibular AH, and mandibular incisor proclination than the CBT group. However, the overbite correction rate and the LII reduction were not significantly different between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IBT and CBT produced similar effects on arch dimensions and dentoskeletal changes. However, the IBT group demonstrated greater arch dimensional changes.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Clinicians may consider IBT if flaring incisors is desired. Alternatively, CBT is better for cases with limited incisor proclination and where minimizing arch dimension change is needed, such as in narrow ridge situations.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>The trial was registered at Thai Clinical Trial Registry on https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org , under the identifier TCTR20230811013.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"29 1","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dental arch dimensional changes in deep bite adults treated with orthodontic fixed appliances in conjunction with maxillary incisor vs. canine bite turbos during the levelling and aligning phase: a randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Puttaporn Supanich, Udom Thongudomporn, Smorntree Viteporn\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00784-024-06145-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This randomized clinical trial compared arch dimensional changes, dentoskeletal changes, and the rate of overbite correction in deep bite adults treated with fixed appliances and either maxillary incisor bite turbos (IBT) or canine bite turbos (CBT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty-six deep bite subjects treated with fixed appliances were randomized into IBT (n = 23) and CBT (n = 23) groups. Changes in intercanine width (ICW), arch height (AH), and Little's Irregularity Index (LII) were analyzed from before treatment (T<sub>0</sub>) to 3 months after aligning with 0.012\\\" NiTi archwires in both arches (T<sub>1</sub>). Cephalometric changes between T<sub>0</sub> and the visit when normal overbite was achieved (T<sub>2</sub>) were assessed. Within-group and between-group comparisons were analyzed at a significance level of 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both groups, mandibular ICW, and maxillary and mandibular AH significantly increased while maxillary and mandibular LII decreased. Maxillary and mandibular incisor proclination and molar extrusion were observed. The IBT group showed significantly greater changes in mandibular ICW, maxillary and mandibular AH, and mandibular incisor proclination than the CBT group. However, the overbite correction rate and the LII reduction were not significantly different between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IBT and CBT produced similar effects on arch dimensions and dentoskeletal changes. However, the IBT group demonstrated greater arch dimensional changes.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Clinicians may consider IBT if flaring incisors is desired. Alternatively, CBT is better for cases with limited incisor proclination and where minimizing arch dimension change is needed, such as in narrow ridge situations.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>The trial was registered at Thai Clinical Trial Registry on https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org , under the identifier TCTR20230811013.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oral Investigations\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oral Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-06145-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-06145-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:这项随机临床试验比较了使用固定矫治器和上颌切牙咬合涡轮(IBT)或犬齿咬合涡轮(CBT)治疗的深咬成人的牙弓尺寸变化、牙骨变化和覆盖咬合矫正率。材料与方法:将46例深咬患者随机分为IBT组(n = 23)和CBT组(n = 23)。分析治疗前(T0)至双弓对准0.012”NiTi弓丝(T1)后3个月犬齿间宽度(ICW)、弓高(AH)和Little’s不规则指数(LII)的变化。评估T0至复诊时正常复咬合(T2)的头颅测量变化。组内和组间比较均以0.05的显著性水平进行分析。结果:两组患者下颌骨ICW、上颌和下颌骨AH均显著升高,上颌和下颌骨LII均显著降低。观察上颌、下颌切牙前倾和磨牙挤压情况。IBT组下颌骨ICW、上颌和下颌骨AH、下切牙前倾的变化明显大于CBT组。两组间复咬矫正率和LII复位无显著性差异。结论:IBT和CBT对牙弓尺寸和牙骨骼变化的影响相似。然而,IBT组表现出更大的弓维变化。临床相关性:如果需要拔除门牙,临床医生可能会考虑IBT。另外,CBT对于门牙前倾有限的病例和需要最大限度地减少弓尺寸变化的情况更好,例如在狭窄的牙脊情况下。临床试验注册:该试验在泰国临床试验注册中心https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org注册,编号为TCTR20230811013。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dental arch dimensional changes in deep bite adults treated with orthodontic fixed appliances in conjunction with maxillary incisor vs. canine bite turbos during the levelling and aligning phase: a randomized clinical trial.

Introduction: This randomized clinical trial compared arch dimensional changes, dentoskeletal changes, and the rate of overbite correction in deep bite adults treated with fixed appliances and either maxillary incisor bite turbos (IBT) or canine bite turbos (CBT).

Materials and methods: Forty-six deep bite subjects treated with fixed appliances were randomized into IBT (n = 23) and CBT (n = 23) groups. Changes in intercanine width (ICW), arch height (AH), and Little's Irregularity Index (LII) were analyzed from before treatment (T0) to 3 months after aligning with 0.012" NiTi archwires in both arches (T1). Cephalometric changes between T0 and the visit when normal overbite was achieved (T2) were assessed. Within-group and between-group comparisons were analyzed at a significance level of 0.05.

Results: In both groups, mandibular ICW, and maxillary and mandibular AH significantly increased while maxillary and mandibular LII decreased. Maxillary and mandibular incisor proclination and molar extrusion were observed. The IBT group showed significantly greater changes in mandibular ICW, maxillary and mandibular AH, and mandibular incisor proclination than the CBT group. However, the overbite correction rate and the LII reduction were not significantly different between the groups.

Conclusions: The IBT and CBT produced similar effects on arch dimensions and dentoskeletal changes. However, the IBT group demonstrated greater arch dimensional changes.

Clinical relevance: Clinicians may consider IBT if flaring incisors is desired. Alternatively, CBT is better for cases with limited incisor proclination and where minimizing arch dimension change is needed, such as in narrow ridge situations.

Clinical trial registration: The trial was registered at Thai Clinical Trial Registry on https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org , under the identifier TCTR20230811013.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信