机构

IF 5.7 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Theodore R. Schatzki
{"title":"机构","authors":"Theodore R. Schatzki","doi":"10.1016/j.infoandorg.2024.100553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This essay urges researchers to respect differences among the agencies of different kinds of entities as well as among types of “distributed agency” understood as the agentic character of combinations of entities and events. In opposition, moreover, to the strong approach to sociomateriality in IS, the essay holds that most nexuses to which human people are integral aggregate the different agencies of the entities and events that compose them. The essay develops these theses by carefully sorting out different conceptions of agency and by both disambiguating and exploring four prominent claims contained in the idea that agency is tied to combinations of entities and events. Sorting out different conceptions of agency also shows that agency is causality, that is, particular forms of causality. The overall result is a defense of the integrity of the concept of agency as a reflection of the noun-verb structure of human languages.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47253,"journal":{"name":"Information and Organization","volume":"35 1","pages":"Article 100553"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agency\",\"authors\":\"Theodore R. Schatzki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.infoandorg.2024.100553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This essay urges researchers to respect differences among the agencies of different kinds of entities as well as among types of “distributed agency” understood as the agentic character of combinations of entities and events. In opposition, moreover, to the strong approach to sociomateriality in IS, the essay holds that most nexuses to which human people are integral aggregate the different agencies of the entities and events that compose them. The essay develops these theses by carefully sorting out different conceptions of agency and by both disambiguating and exploring four prominent claims contained in the idea that agency is tied to combinations of entities and events. Sorting out different conceptions of agency also shows that agency is causality, that is, particular forms of causality. The overall result is a defense of the integrity of the concept of agency as a reflection of the noun-verb structure of human languages.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information and Organization\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100553\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information and Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471772724000538\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Organization","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471772724000538","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文敦促研究者尊重不同类型实体的代理之间的差异,以及被理解为实体和事件组合的代理特征的“分布式代理”类型之间的差异。此外,与IS中对社会物质性的强烈态度相反,本文认为,人类作为整体的大多数纽带聚集了构成它们的实体和事件的不同机构。本文通过仔细整理代理的不同概念,并通过消除歧义和探索代理与实体和事件的组合相关联这一观点中包含的四个重要主张,来发展这些论点。对不同的代理概念的梳理也表明,代理就是因果关系,即因果关系的特定形式。总体结果是对代理概念作为人类语言名动结构反映的完整性的辩护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Agency
This essay urges researchers to respect differences among the agencies of different kinds of entities as well as among types of “distributed agency” understood as the agentic character of combinations of entities and events. In opposition, moreover, to the strong approach to sociomateriality in IS, the essay holds that most nexuses to which human people are integral aggregate the different agencies of the entities and events that compose them. The essay develops these theses by carefully sorting out different conceptions of agency and by both disambiguating and exploring four prominent claims contained in the idea that agency is tied to combinations of entities and events. Sorting out different conceptions of agency also shows that agency is causality, that is, particular forms of causality. The overall result is a defense of the integrity of the concept of agency as a reflection of the noun-verb structure of human languages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Advances in information and communication technologies are associated with a wide and increasing range of social consequences, which are experienced by individuals, work groups, organizations, interorganizational networks, and societies at large. Information technologies are implicated in all industries and in public as well as private enterprises. Understanding the relationships between information technologies and social organization is an increasingly important and urgent social and scholarly concern in many disciplinary fields.Information and Organization seeks to publish original scholarly articles on the relationships between information technologies and social organization. It seeks a scholarly understanding that is based on empirical research and relevant theory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信