IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Zhe Yang, Michael O Killian
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Anxiety Measurement Scales in Pediatric Organ Transplantation Patients.","authors":"Zhe Yang, Michael O Killian","doi":"10.1177/15269248241305018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anxiety symptoms influence health outcomes in pediatric organ transplant recipients. Assessing the quality of anxiety scales is critical to address the psychological challenges these patients face. Variability in how anxiety is conceptualized across scales highlights the need for selecting appropriate instruments.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aimed to search and synthesize anxiety scales used in pediatric organ transplant studies, evaluate their reliability and validity, examine factors and group differences related to anxiety, and identify promising scales for this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted using the terms \"(Anxiety) AND (organ transplant) AND (child* OR youth OR pediatric* OR adolescen*).\" Ten electronic databases were accessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen anxiety scales from 30 articles were identified. Fourteen scales measured specific anxiety types. Most scales demonstrated good to excellent reliability and validity. Associations between anxiety and demographics, psychological well-being, factors related to illness and treatment were observed. Five types of anxiety-related differences among groups and 6 promising anxiety scales for the target population were identified.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>General and specialized anxiety scales were identified. Incomplete reporting of psychometric evidence restricted the quality assessment. Limitations include cultural and publication biases. Future research should focus on transplant-specific scales with psychometric validation across culturally diverse settings to ensure their quality and applicability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review identified well-validated scales, such as State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, effective for quick screening. Specialized instruments were used for nuanced anxiety concepts such as needle-related anxiety, illness-specific anxiety, and anxiety during the transition to adult care, but further psychometric validation is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"15269248241305018"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15269248241305018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介焦虑症状会影响儿科器官移植受者的健康状况。评估焦虑量表的质量对于应对这些患者面临的心理挑战至关重要。不同量表在焦虑概念上的差异凸显了选择合适工具的必要性:本系统综述旨在搜索和综合儿科器官移植研究中使用的焦虑量表,评估其信度和效度,研究与焦虑相关的因素和群体差异,并为这一人群确定有前景的量表:方法:使用"(焦虑)和(器官移植)和(儿童*或青少年或小儿*或青少年*)"等术语进行系统检索。检索了 10 个电子数据库:结果:从 30 篇文章中确定了 18 个焦虑量表。其中 14 个量表测量了特定的焦虑类型。大多数量表的信度和效度都达到了良好或优秀的水平。观察到焦虑与人口统计学、心理健康、疾病相关因素和治疗之间的关联。确定了五种与焦虑有关的群体间差异,以及六种有希望适用于目标人群的焦虑量表:讨论:确定了一般焦虑量表和特殊焦虑量表。心理测量证据报告的不完整性限制了质量评估。局限性包括文化和出版偏见。未来的研究应侧重于在不同文化背景下进行心理测量验证的移植专用量表,以确保其质量和适用性:本综述确定了经过充分验证的量表,如《儿童状态-特质焦虑量表》和《广泛性焦虑症-7》,可有效进行快速筛查。对于细微的焦虑概念,如针头相关焦虑、疾病特定焦虑和向成人护理过渡期间的焦虑,则使用了专门的工具,但还需要进一步的心理测量验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Systematic Review of Anxiety Measurement Scales in Pediatric Organ Transplantation Patients.

Introduction: Anxiety symptoms influence health outcomes in pediatric organ transplant recipients. Assessing the quality of anxiety scales is critical to address the psychological challenges these patients face. Variability in how anxiety is conceptualized across scales highlights the need for selecting appropriate instruments.

Objective: This systematic review aimed to search and synthesize anxiety scales used in pediatric organ transplant studies, evaluate their reliability and validity, examine factors and group differences related to anxiety, and identify promising scales for this population.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted using the terms "(Anxiety) AND (organ transplant) AND (child* OR youth OR pediatric* OR adolescen*)." Ten electronic databases were accessed.

Results: Eighteen anxiety scales from 30 articles were identified. Fourteen scales measured specific anxiety types. Most scales demonstrated good to excellent reliability and validity. Associations between anxiety and demographics, psychological well-being, factors related to illness and treatment were observed. Five types of anxiety-related differences among groups and 6 promising anxiety scales for the target population were identified.

Discussion: General and specialized anxiety scales were identified. Incomplete reporting of psychometric evidence restricted the quality assessment. Limitations include cultural and publication biases. Future research should focus on transplant-specific scales with psychometric validation across culturally diverse settings to ensure their quality and applicability.

Conclusion: This review identified well-validated scales, such as State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, effective for quick screening. Specialized instruments were used for nuanced anxiety concepts such as needle-related anxiety, illness-specific anxiety, and anxiety during the transition to adult care, but further psychometric validation is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Transplantation
Progress in Transplantation SURGERY-TRANSPLANTATION
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Transplantation (PIT) is the official journal of NATCO, The Organization for Transplant Professionals. Journal Partners include: Australasian Transplant Coordinators Association and Society for Transplant Social Workers. PIT reflects the multi-disciplinary team approach to procurement and clinical aspects of organ and tissue transplantation by providing a professional forum for exchange of the continually changing body of knowledge in transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信