复杂的遗传相互作用影响BIN1和MS4A6A基因座对阿尔茨海默病风险的易感性

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Alireza Nazarian, Marissa Morado, Alexander M. Kulminski
{"title":"复杂的遗传相互作用影响BIN1和MS4A6A基因座对阿尔茨海默病风险的易感性","authors":"Alireza Nazarian, Marissa Morado, Alexander M. Kulminski","doi":"10.1007/s11357-024-01477-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Genetics is the second strongest risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) after age. More than 70 loci have been implicated in AD susceptibility so far, and the genetic architecture of AD entails both additive and nonadditive contributions from these loci. To better understand nonadditive impact of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on AD risk, we examined individual, joint, and interacting (SNPxSNP) effects of 139 and 66 SNPs mapped to the <i>BIN1</i> and <i>MS4A6A</i> AD-associated loci, respectively. The analyses were conducted by fitting three respective dominant allelic-effect models using data from four independent studies. Joint effects were analyzed by considering pairwise combinations of genotypes of the selected SNPs, i.e., compound genotypes (CompG). The individual SNP analyses showed associations of 18 <i>BIN1</i> SNPs and 4 <i>MS4A6A</i> SNPs with AD. We identified 589 <i>BIN1</i> and 217 <i>MS4A6A</i> SNP pairs associated with AD in the CompG analysis, although their individual SNPs were not linked to AD independently. Notably, 34 <i>BIN1</i> and 10 <i>MS4A6A</i> SNP pairs exhibited both significant SNPxSNP interaction effects and significant CompG effects. The vast majority of nonadditive effects were captured through the CompG analysis. These results expand the current understanding of the contributions of the <i>BIN1</i> and <i>MS4A6A</i> loci to AD susceptibility. The identified nonadditive effects suggest a significant genetic modulation mechanism underlying the genetic heterogeneity of AD in these loci. Our findings highlight the importance of considering nonadditive genetic impacts on AD risk beyond the traditional SNPxSNP approximation, as they may uncover critical mechanisms not apparent when examining SNPs individually.</p>","PeriodicalId":12730,"journal":{"name":"GeroScience","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complex genetic interactions affect susceptibility to Alzheimer's disease risk in the BIN1 and MS4A6A loci\",\"authors\":\"Alireza Nazarian, Marissa Morado, Alexander M. Kulminski\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11357-024-01477-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Genetics is the second strongest risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) after age. More than 70 loci have been implicated in AD susceptibility so far, and the genetic architecture of AD entails both additive and nonadditive contributions from these loci. To better understand nonadditive impact of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on AD risk, we examined individual, joint, and interacting (SNPxSNP) effects of 139 and 66 SNPs mapped to the <i>BIN1</i> and <i>MS4A6A</i> AD-associated loci, respectively. The analyses were conducted by fitting three respective dominant allelic-effect models using data from four independent studies. Joint effects were analyzed by considering pairwise combinations of genotypes of the selected SNPs, i.e., compound genotypes (CompG). The individual SNP analyses showed associations of 18 <i>BIN1</i> SNPs and 4 <i>MS4A6A</i> SNPs with AD. We identified 589 <i>BIN1</i> and 217 <i>MS4A6A</i> SNP pairs associated with AD in the CompG analysis, although their individual SNPs were not linked to AD independently. Notably, 34 <i>BIN1</i> and 10 <i>MS4A6A</i> SNP pairs exhibited both significant SNPxSNP interaction effects and significant CompG effects. The vast majority of nonadditive effects were captured through the CompG analysis. These results expand the current understanding of the contributions of the <i>BIN1</i> and <i>MS4A6A</i> loci to AD susceptibility. The identified nonadditive effects suggest a significant genetic modulation mechanism underlying the genetic heterogeneity of AD in these loci. Our findings highlight the importance of considering nonadditive genetic impacts on AD risk beyond the traditional SNPxSNP approximation, as they may uncover critical mechanisms not apparent when examining SNPs individually.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GeroScience\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GeroScience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-024-01477-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GeroScience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-024-01477-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

遗传是阿尔茨海默病(AD)的第二大风险因素,仅次于年龄。到目前为止,已有超过70个基因座与阿尔茨海默病的易感性有关,阿尔茨海默病的遗传结构需要这些基因座的加性和非加性贡献。为了更好地了解单核苷酸多态性(snp)对AD风险的非加性影响,我们分别检测了139个和66个与BIN1和MS4A6A AD相关位点相关的snp的个体、联合和相互作用(SNPxSNP)效应。分析是通过拟合三个各自的显性等位基因效应模型来进行的,这些模型使用了来自四个独立研究的数据。通过考虑所选snp基因型的两两组合,即复合基因型(CompG)来分析联合效应。个体SNP分析显示18个BIN1 SNP和4个MS4A6A SNP与AD相关。我们在CompG分析中发现了与AD相关的589对BIN1和217对MS4A6A SNP对,尽管它们的单个SNP并不独立与AD相关。值得注意的是,34对BIN1和10对MS4A6A SNP对均表现出显著的SNP - xsnp互作效应和显著的CompG效应。通过CompG分析捕获了绝大多数非加性效应。这些结果扩展了目前对BIN1和MS4A6A基因座对AD易感性的贡献的理解。发现的非加性效应表明,在这些基因座中,AD的遗传异质性存在显著的遗传调节机制。我们的研究结果强调了考虑非加性遗传影响对AD风险的重要性,而不是传统的SNPxSNP近似,因为它们可能揭示在单独检查SNPs时不明显的关键机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Complex genetic interactions affect susceptibility to Alzheimer's disease risk in the BIN1 and MS4A6A loci

Genetics is the second strongest risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) after age. More than 70 loci have been implicated in AD susceptibility so far, and the genetic architecture of AD entails both additive and nonadditive contributions from these loci. To better understand nonadditive impact of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on AD risk, we examined individual, joint, and interacting (SNPxSNP) effects of 139 and 66 SNPs mapped to the BIN1 and MS4A6A AD-associated loci, respectively. The analyses were conducted by fitting three respective dominant allelic-effect models using data from four independent studies. Joint effects were analyzed by considering pairwise combinations of genotypes of the selected SNPs, i.e., compound genotypes (CompG). The individual SNP analyses showed associations of 18 BIN1 SNPs and 4 MS4A6A SNPs with AD. We identified 589 BIN1 and 217 MS4A6A SNP pairs associated with AD in the CompG analysis, although their individual SNPs were not linked to AD independently. Notably, 34 BIN1 and 10 MS4A6A SNP pairs exhibited both significant SNPxSNP interaction effects and significant CompG effects. The vast majority of nonadditive effects were captured through the CompG analysis. These results expand the current understanding of the contributions of the BIN1 and MS4A6A loci to AD susceptibility. The identified nonadditive effects suggest a significant genetic modulation mechanism underlying the genetic heterogeneity of AD in these loci. Our findings highlight the importance of considering nonadditive genetic impacts on AD risk beyond the traditional SNPxSNP approximation, as they may uncover critical mechanisms not apparent when examining SNPs individually.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
GeroScience
GeroScience Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.40%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: GeroScience is a bi-monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes articles related to research in the biology of aging and research on biomedical applications that impact aging. The scope of articles to be considered include evolutionary biology, biophysics, genetics, genomics, proteomics, molecular biology, cell biology, biochemistry, endocrinology, immunology, physiology, pharmacology, neuroscience, and psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信