不会再被愚弄?工作“新”世界中新颖性的话语结构理论化

IF 2.7 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Jeremy Aroles, Aurélie Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, John Hassard, William M Foster, Edward Granter
{"title":"不会再被愚弄?工作“新”世界中新颖性的话语结构理论化","authors":"Jeremy Aroles, Aurélie Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, John Hassard, William M Foster, Edward Granter","doi":"10.1177/09500170241300948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article outlines how notions of novelty define today’s work practices and debates what the discursive construction of work as ‘new’ means. On the one hand, we highlight a misplaced emphasis on change and novelty that can lead to unnecessary dichotomization in the characterization and discursive construction of work practices and organizational phenomena. On the other, we specify substantive continuities in a range of strategic, organizational and employment arrangements. As such, we contend that a critical evaluation of key characteristics of contemporary work reveals that they are often not unique. Instead, these characteristics reflect the extending, rebranding or reshaping of measures and processes fashioned in earlier forms of value production. Ultimately, we theorize how the promotion of the ‘new’ world of work reflects structures and practices somehow altered in appearance, yet still analogous in substance, to those found in the traditional employment and production fabric of organizations.","PeriodicalId":48187,"journal":{"name":"Work Employment and Society","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Won’t Get Fooled Again? Theorizing Discursive Constructions of Novelty in the ‘New’ World of Work\",\"authors\":\"Jeremy Aroles, Aurélie Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, John Hassard, William M Foster, Edward Granter\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09500170241300948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article outlines how notions of novelty define today’s work practices and debates what the discursive construction of work as ‘new’ means. On the one hand, we highlight a misplaced emphasis on change and novelty that can lead to unnecessary dichotomization in the characterization and discursive construction of work practices and organizational phenomena. On the other, we specify substantive continuities in a range of strategic, organizational and employment arrangements. As such, we contend that a critical evaluation of key characteristics of contemporary work reveals that they are often not unique. Instead, these characteristics reflect the extending, rebranding or reshaping of measures and processes fashioned in earlier forms of value production. Ultimately, we theorize how the promotion of the ‘new’ world of work reflects structures and practices somehow altered in appearance, yet still analogous in substance, to those found in the traditional employment and production fabric of organizations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Work Employment and Society\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Work Employment and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170241300948\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work Employment and Society","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170241300948","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文概述了新颖性的概念如何定义当今的工作实践,并讨论了工作的话语构建作为“新”的含义。一方面,我们强调了对变化和新颖性的错位强调,这可能导致在工作实践和组织现象的表征和话语构建中不必要的二分法。另一方面,我们明确了一系列战略、组织和就业安排的实质性连续性。因此,我们认为,对当代作品关键特征的批判性评估表明,它们往往不是独一无二的。相反,这些特征反映了在早期价值生产形式中形成的措施和过程的扩展、重塑或重塑。最后,我们理论化了“新”工作世界的促进如何反映了结构和实践在某种程度上在外观上发生了变化,但在本质上仍然类似于那些在组织的传统就业和生产结构中发现的结构和实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Won’t Get Fooled Again? Theorizing Discursive Constructions of Novelty in the ‘New’ World of Work
This article outlines how notions of novelty define today’s work practices and debates what the discursive construction of work as ‘new’ means. On the one hand, we highlight a misplaced emphasis on change and novelty that can lead to unnecessary dichotomization in the characterization and discursive construction of work practices and organizational phenomena. On the other, we specify substantive continuities in a range of strategic, organizational and employment arrangements. As such, we contend that a critical evaluation of key characteristics of contemporary work reveals that they are often not unique. Instead, these characteristics reflect the extending, rebranding or reshaping of measures and processes fashioned in earlier forms of value production. Ultimately, we theorize how the promotion of the ‘new’ world of work reflects structures and practices somehow altered in appearance, yet still analogous in substance, to those found in the traditional employment and production fabric of organizations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
13.50%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Work, Employment and Society (WES) is a leading international peer reviewed journal of the British Sociological Association which publishes theoretically informed and original research on the sociology of work. Work, Employment and Society covers all aspects of work, employment and unemployment and their connections with wider social processes and social structures. The journal is sociologically orientated but welcomes contributions from other disciplines which addresses the issues in a way that informs less debated aspects of the journal"s remit, such as unpaid labour and the informal economy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信