孟加拉国脊髓损伤患者功能独立与社区融合的关系

IF 1.3 Q3 REHABILITATION
Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-11 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fresc.2024.1435656
Shazal Kumar Das, Md Bakhtiar, Saiba Muhammad Sabrin, Michael Curtin, Ehsanur Rahman, Zahid Bin Sultan Nahid, Zakia Rahman, Md Furatul Haque, Md Fazlul Karim Patwary, Md Jahangir Alam, Md Emran Hossain, Md Atiar Rahman, Shafiqul Islam, Md Ashfaquzzaman, Md Anowar Khasru Parvez
{"title":"孟加拉国脊髓损伤患者功能独立与社区融合的关系","authors":"Shazal Kumar Das, Md Bakhtiar, Saiba Muhammad Sabrin, Michael Curtin, Ehsanur Rahman, Zahid Bin Sultan Nahid, Zakia Rahman, Md Furatul Haque, Md Fazlul Karim Patwary, Md Jahangir Alam, Md Emran Hossain, Md Atiar Rahman, Shafiqul Islam, Md Ashfaquzzaman, Md Anowar Khasru Parvez","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2024.1435656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the functional outcome and home and social integration of people who had spinal cord injury and completed their inpatient rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Centre for the Rehabilitation of the Paralysed (CRP), Bangladesh.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) and Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) were used to analyse the relationship between the functional outcome and home and social integration at the end of rehabilitation. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of two hundred participants (181 men and 19 women) were recruited for the study. Among the participants, 92.5% of them reported a history of trauma or accident, including road traffic accidents, falls and other injuries. Approximately 60% of participants presented with paraplegia and 62.5% of participants were categorized on the ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) as Grade A, complete spinal cord injury. Participants with paraplegia and participants with a Grade B, incomplete injury, on the AIS were functionally more independent (<i>p</i> = 0.011)) compared with participants with tetraplegia and other AIS grades. Participants with paraplegia reported having a more active lifestyle (<i>p</i> = 0.040) in their home and social activities compared to those with tetraplegia. There was no significant association found between functional independence at pre-discharged and community integration one-month post-discharge of the people with SCI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A month after discharge, there is no statistically significant relationship between community reintegration and functional independence. A measure of functional independence may not be a suitable indicator of community integration. It is proposed that to monitor a person's community integration the CIQ could be used with a measure of quality of life as this would indicate a person's contentment with their level of community integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":73102,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","volume":"5 ","pages":"1435656"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11668740/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between functional independence and community integration of people with spinal cord injury in Bangladesh.\",\"authors\":\"Shazal Kumar Das, Md Bakhtiar, Saiba Muhammad Sabrin, Michael Curtin, Ehsanur Rahman, Zahid Bin Sultan Nahid, Zakia Rahman, Md Furatul Haque, Md Fazlul Karim Patwary, Md Jahangir Alam, Md Emran Hossain, Md Atiar Rahman, Shafiqul Islam, Md Ashfaquzzaman, Md Anowar Khasru Parvez\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fresc.2024.1435656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the functional outcome and home and social integration of people who had spinal cord injury and completed their inpatient rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Centre for the Rehabilitation of the Paralysed (CRP), Bangladesh.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) and Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) were used to analyse the relationship between the functional outcome and home and social integration at the end of rehabilitation. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of two hundred participants (181 men and 19 women) were recruited for the study. Among the participants, 92.5% of them reported a history of trauma or accident, including road traffic accidents, falls and other injuries. Approximately 60% of participants presented with paraplegia and 62.5% of participants were categorized on the ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) as Grade A, complete spinal cord injury. Participants with paraplegia and participants with a Grade B, incomplete injury, on the AIS were functionally more independent (<i>p</i> = 0.011)) compared with participants with tetraplegia and other AIS grades. Participants with paraplegia reported having a more active lifestyle (<i>p</i> = 0.040) in their home and social activities compared to those with tetraplegia. There was no significant association found between functional independence at pre-discharged and community integration one-month post-discharge of the people with SCI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A month after discharge, there is no statistically significant relationship between community reintegration and functional independence. A measure of functional independence may not be a suitable indicator of community integration. It is proposed that to monitor a person's community integration the CIQ could be used with a measure of quality of life as this would indicate a person's contentment with their level of community integration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"1435656\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11668740/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2024.1435656\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2024.1435656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

设计:前瞻性横断面研究。目的:了解脊髓损伤患者完成住院康复后的功能结局和家庭与社会融合情况。地点:孟加拉国瘫痪者康复中心。方法:采用脊髓独立性量表(SCIM)和社区融入问卷(CIQ)分析康复末期功能结局与家庭和社会融入的关系。采用描述性统计和推断性统计对数据进行分析。结果:共有200名参与者(181名男性和19名女性)被招募参加这项研究。在参与者中,92.5%的人报告有创伤或事故史,包括道路交通事故、跌倒和其他伤害。大约60%的参与者表现为截瘫,62.5%的参与者在亚洲损伤量表(AIS)中被归类为A级,完全性脊髓损伤。与四肢瘫痪和其他AIS等级的参与者相比,截瘫和B级不完全性损伤的参与者在AIS上的功能独立性更高(p = 0.011)。截瘫患者报告说,与四肢瘫痪患者相比,截瘫患者在家庭和社交活动中有更积极的生活方式(p = 0.040)。脊髓损伤患者出院前的功能独立性与出院后1个月的社区整合之间无显著相关性。结论:出院后1个月,社区重返与功能独立无统计学意义。衡量功能独立性可能不是衡量社区一体化的合适指标。有人建议,为了监测一个人的社区融入,CIQ可以与生活质量的衡量一起使用,因为这将表明一个人对他们的社区融入水平的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relationship between functional independence and community integration of people with spinal cord injury in Bangladesh.

Design: Prospective, cross-sectional study.

Objectives: To determine the functional outcome and home and social integration of people who had spinal cord injury and completed their inpatient rehabilitation.

Setting: Centre for the Rehabilitation of the Paralysed (CRP), Bangladesh.

Methods: Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) and Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) were used to analyse the relationship between the functional outcome and home and social integration at the end of rehabilitation. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed to analyse the data.

Results: A total of two hundred participants (181 men and 19 women) were recruited for the study. Among the participants, 92.5% of them reported a history of trauma or accident, including road traffic accidents, falls and other injuries. Approximately 60% of participants presented with paraplegia and 62.5% of participants were categorized on the ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) as Grade A, complete spinal cord injury. Participants with paraplegia and participants with a Grade B, incomplete injury, on the AIS were functionally more independent (p = 0.011)) compared with participants with tetraplegia and other AIS grades. Participants with paraplegia reported having a more active lifestyle (p = 0.040) in their home and social activities compared to those with tetraplegia. There was no significant association found between functional independence at pre-discharged and community integration one-month post-discharge of the people with SCI.

Conclusion: A month after discharge, there is no statistically significant relationship between community reintegration and functional independence. A measure of functional independence may not be a suitable indicator of community integration. It is proposed that to monitor a person's community integration the CIQ could be used with a measure of quality of life as this would indicate a person's contentment with their level of community integration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信