批判反种族主义话语分析应用于联邦合格医疗中心政策。

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jennifer Jabson Tree, Judson Laughter, Sandra Wairimu, Khadijah Melvin, Eboni Winford
{"title":"批判反种族主义话语分析应用于联邦合格医疗中心政策。","authors":"Jennifer Jabson Tree, Judson Laughter, Sandra Wairimu, Khadijah Melvin, Eboni Winford","doi":"10.1177/15248399241308196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) seek to improve health equity for marginalized and historically disenfranchised communities. However, FQHC policies are not necessarily designed to be explicitly anti-racist. This can result in institutional racism shaping and influencing policy. FQHCs motivated to engage racism-conscious policy need anti-racism policy analyses. We applied one such method to an FQHC's operations manual: Critical, Anti-Racist, and Discourse Analysis (CARDA). Using CARDA, three themes were identified, describing pathways along which institutional racism might be reified: (a) procedures for actions were specified but no specific position was listed as responsible, (b) policies written in passive voice, and (c) absence of explicit delineation of workflow responsibilities. Dismantling institutional racism requires analyzing policies that have potential for unintended effects. Cultivating clear policies and procedures for addressing harm and naming positions responsible for implementation of policy and procedure builds accountability, trust, and relationships between institutions and communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":47956,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Practice","volume":" ","pages":"15248399241308196"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical Anti-Racist Discourse Analysis Applied to Federally Qualified Health Center Policy.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Jabson Tree, Judson Laughter, Sandra Wairimu, Khadijah Melvin, Eboni Winford\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15248399241308196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) seek to improve health equity for marginalized and historically disenfranchised communities. However, FQHC policies are not necessarily designed to be explicitly anti-racist. This can result in institutional racism shaping and influencing policy. FQHCs motivated to engage racism-conscious policy need anti-racism policy analyses. We applied one such method to an FQHC's operations manual: Critical, Anti-Racist, and Discourse Analysis (CARDA). Using CARDA, three themes were identified, describing pathways along which institutional racism might be reified: (a) procedures for actions were specified but no specific position was listed as responsible, (b) policies written in passive voice, and (c) absence of explicit delineation of workflow responsibilities. Dismantling institutional racism requires analyzing policies that have potential for unintended effects. Cultivating clear policies and procedures for addressing harm and naming positions responsible for implementation of policy and procedure builds accountability, trust, and relationships between institutions and communities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15248399241308196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399241308196\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399241308196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

联邦合格医疗中心(FQHCs)致力于改善边缘化和历史上被剥夺权利的社区的医疗公平。然而,FQHC政策并不一定是明确反种族主义的。这可能导致制度性种族主义形成和影响政策。有动机采取种族主义意识政策的金融中心需要反种族主义政策分析。我们将其中一种方法应用于FQHC的操作手册:批判、反种族主义和话语分析(CARDA)。使用CARDA,确定了三个主题,描述了制度化种族主义可能具体化的途径:(a)规定了行动程序,但没有列出具体的责任职位,(b)以被动语态编写的政策,以及(c)缺乏对工作流程责任的明确描述。废除制度性种族主义需要分析可能产生意想不到影响的政策。制定明确的政策和程序来解决危害,并指定负责实施政策和程序的职位,建立机构和社区之间的问责制、信任和关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Critical Anti-Racist Discourse Analysis Applied to Federally Qualified Health Center Policy.

Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) seek to improve health equity for marginalized and historically disenfranchised communities. However, FQHC policies are not necessarily designed to be explicitly anti-racist. This can result in institutional racism shaping and influencing policy. FQHCs motivated to engage racism-conscious policy need anti-racism policy analyses. We applied one such method to an FQHC's operations manual: Critical, Anti-Racist, and Discourse Analysis (CARDA). Using CARDA, three themes were identified, describing pathways along which institutional racism might be reified: (a) procedures for actions were specified but no specific position was listed as responsible, (b) policies written in passive voice, and (c) absence of explicit delineation of workflow responsibilities. Dismantling institutional racism requires analyzing policies that have potential for unintended effects. Cultivating clear policies and procedures for addressing harm and naming positions responsible for implementation of policy and procedure builds accountability, trust, and relationships between institutions and communities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion Practice
Health Promotion Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: Health Promotion Practice (HPP) publishes authoritative articles devoted to the practical application of health promotion and education. It publishes information of strategic importance to a broad base of professionals engaged in the practice of developing, implementing, and evaluating health promotion and disease prevention programs. The journal"s editorial board is committed to focusing on the applications of health promotion and public health education interventions, programs and best practice strategies in various settings, including but not limited to, community, health care, worksite, educational, and international settings. Additionally, the journal focuses on the development and application of public policy conducive to the promotion of health and prevention of disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信