基于标记的RSA与CT-RSA在桡骨远端截骨术后微运动分析中的比较:24例患者1年回顾性研究。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Vasileios Angelomenos, Olof Sandberg, Bita Shareghi, Michael Ullman
{"title":"基于标记的RSA与CT-RSA在桡骨远端截骨术后微运动分析中的比较:24例患者1年回顾性研究。","authors":"Vasileios Angelomenos,&nbsp;Olof Sandberg,&nbsp;Bita Shareghi,&nbsp;Michael Ullman","doi":"10.1002/jor.26031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA) is the most accurate method for determining early micromotions of orthopedic implants. Computed Tomography Radiostereometric Analysis (CT-RSA) is a method that can be used to determine implant and bone micromovements using low-dose CT scans. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of the CT-RSA method in measuring the interfragmental mobility in patients who have undergone a correction osteotomy due to a malunited distal radius fracture. Twenty-four patients were included and operated with a radiolucent volar plate. Markers were embedded in the plate and bone. RSA and CT examinations were obtained postoperatively up to 1-year postoperative. Micromovements of the distal radius segment relative to the proximal were compared between the methods with paired analysis and Bland–Altman plots. The limits of clinical significance were: dorsal/volar tilt &lt; 10°, radial shortening &lt; 5 mm, radial inclination ≥ 15°, and radial shift &lt; 5 mm. For the dorsal/volar tilt, the paired analysis between the two methods, showed a mean difference (95% CI) of −0.06° (−0.67 to 0.55), for radial compression-0.04 mm (−0.09 to 0.01), for radial inclination 0.21° (−0.06 to 0.48), and for radial shift −0.07 mm (−0.21 to 0.07). The paired analysis for micromotions showed that the thresholds of clinical significance are excluded from the difference's 95% CI. The Bland–Altman plots showed comparable results up to 1 year, considering clinically relevant thresholds. In conclusion, the CT-RSA method is comparable to that of marker-based RSA in measuring micromotions after wrist osteotomy, as the differences between the methods are not clinically significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":16650,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","volume":"43 3","pages":"660-670"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jor.26031","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Marker-Based RSA and CT-RSA for Analyzing Micromotions After Distal Radius Osteotomy: A 1-Year Retrospective Study of 24 Patients\",\"authors\":\"Vasileios Angelomenos,&nbsp;Olof Sandberg,&nbsp;Bita Shareghi,&nbsp;Michael Ullman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jor.26031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA) is the most accurate method for determining early micromotions of orthopedic implants. Computed Tomography Radiostereometric Analysis (CT-RSA) is a method that can be used to determine implant and bone micromovements using low-dose CT scans. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of the CT-RSA method in measuring the interfragmental mobility in patients who have undergone a correction osteotomy due to a malunited distal radius fracture. Twenty-four patients were included and operated with a radiolucent volar plate. Markers were embedded in the plate and bone. RSA and CT examinations were obtained postoperatively up to 1-year postoperative. Micromovements of the distal radius segment relative to the proximal were compared between the methods with paired analysis and Bland–Altman plots. The limits of clinical significance were: dorsal/volar tilt &lt; 10°, radial shortening &lt; 5 mm, radial inclination ≥ 15°, and radial shift &lt; 5 mm. For the dorsal/volar tilt, the paired analysis between the two methods, showed a mean difference (95% CI) of −0.06° (−0.67 to 0.55), for radial compression-0.04 mm (−0.09 to 0.01), for radial inclination 0.21° (−0.06 to 0.48), and for radial shift −0.07 mm (−0.21 to 0.07). The paired analysis for micromotions showed that the thresholds of clinical significance are excluded from the difference's 95% CI. The Bland–Altman plots showed comparable results up to 1 year, considering clinically relevant thresholds. In conclusion, the CT-RSA method is comparable to that of marker-based RSA in measuring micromotions after wrist osteotomy, as the differences between the methods are not clinically significant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®\",\"volume\":\"43 3\",\"pages\":\"660-670\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jor.26031\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jor.26031\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jor.26031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

放射立体分析(RSA)是确定骨科植入物早期微运动最准确的方法。计算机断层扫描放射立体分析(CT- rsa)是一种使用低剂量CT扫描来确定植入物和骨微运动的方法。本研究旨在评估CT-RSA方法在测量因桡骨远端骨折不愈合而行矫正截骨术患者骨折块间活动度方面的可靠性。24例患者接受了放射光掌侧钢板手术。标记嵌入在板和骨头中。术后1年进行RSA和CT检查。用配对分析和Bland-Altman图比较桡骨远端相对于近端的微运动。临床意义的界限是:背侧/掌侧倾斜
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of Marker-Based RSA and CT-RSA for Analyzing Micromotions After Distal Radius Osteotomy: A 1-Year Retrospective Study of 24 Patients

Comparison of Marker-Based RSA and CT-RSA for Analyzing Micromotions After Distal Radius Osteotomy: A 1-Year Retrospective Study of 24 Patients

Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA) is the most accurate method for determining early micromotions of orthopedic implants. Computed Tomography Radiostereometric Analysis (CT-RSA) is a method that can be used to determine implant and bone micromovements using low-dose CT scans. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of the CT-RSA method in measuring the interfragmental mobility in patients who have undergone a correction osteotomy due to a malunited distal radius fracture. Twenty-four patients were included and operated with a radiolucent volar plate. Markers were embedded in the plate and bone. RSA and CT examinations were obtained postoperatively up to 1-year postoperative. Micromovements of the distal radius segment relative to the proximal were compared between the methods with paired analysis and Bland–Altman plots. The limits of clinical significance were: dorsal/volar tilt < 10°, radial shortening < 5 mm, radial inclination ≥ 15°, and radial shift < 5 mm. For the dorsal/volar tilt, the paired analysis between the two methods, showed a mean difference (95% CI) of −0.06° (−0.67 to 0.55), for radial compression-0.04 mm (−0.09 to 0.01), for radial inclination 0.21° (−0.06 to 0.48), and for radial shift −0.07 mm (−0.21 to 0.07). The paired analysis for micromotions showed that the thresholds of clinical significance are excluded from the difference's 95% CI. The Bland–Altman plots showed comparable results up to 1 year, considering clinically relevant thresholds. In conclusion, the CT-RSA method is comparable to that of marker-based RSA in measuring micromotions after wrist osteotomy, as the differences between the methods are not clinically significant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Journal of Orthopaedic Research® 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Research is the forum for the rapid publication of high quality reports of new information on the full spectrum of orthopaedic research, including life sciences, engineering, translational, and clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信