服务质量(QoS)与云服务信任机制的实证关系研究

IF 0.7 4区 计算机科学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Pooja Goyal;Sukhvinder Singh Deora
{"title":"服务质量(QoS)与云服务信任机制的实证关系研究","authors":"Pooja Goyal;Sukhvinder Singh Deora","doi":"10.13052/jwe1540-9589.2372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Service selection has emerged as a prominent challenge due to the flourishing demand for computing services and the dynamic nature of its resources. The increasing demand for cloud services makes it challenging to choose a provider offering equal services and facilities at costs that match those of competing providers. Apart from educating customers in the process of choosing cloud services, trust mechanisms include user reviews, reputation systems, and certifications assist to boost consumers' confidence in cloud services. The service measurement index (SMI) offers a disciplined framework combining both functional and non-functional quality of service indicators concurrently, therefore easing decision-making. The main emphasis of the research is on the fundamental elements influencing the choice of cloud services in the present environment, the identification of extra characteristics of cloud services transcending SMI, and the identification of the most suitable approach for some services. By means of the measurement of customer enjoyment and experience, QoS traits provide some insight on the impact of trust mechanisms on service acceptance. Comparisons of SMI and QoS measurements before and after trust mechanism deployment provide insightful analysis. Empirical research guides these comparisons. This study aims to clarify the interactions among QoS, trust mechanisms, and cloud service adoption as well as highlight the implications these elements have for customers and service providers. Furthermore, presented in this paper is an algorithm using a comprehensive method to trust estimation in order to ascertain the degree of confidence worthiness of certain people.","PeriodicalId":49952,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Web Engineering","volume":"23 7","pages":"913-971"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the Empirical Relationship Between Quality of Service (QoS) and Trust Mechanisms of Cloud Services\",\"authors\":\"Pooja Goyal;Sukhvinder Singh Deora\",\"doi\":\"10.13052/jwe1540-9589.2372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Service selection has emerged as a prominent challenge due to the flourishing demand for computing services and the dynamic nature of its resources. The increasing demand for cloud services makes it challenging to choose a provider offering equal services and facilities at costs that match those of competing providers. Apart from educating customers in the process of choosing cloud services, trust mechanisms include user reviews, reputation systems, and certifications assist to boost consumers' confidence in cloud services. The service measurement index (SMI) offers a disciplined framework combining both functional and non-functional quality of service indicators concurrently, therefore easing decision-making. The main emphasis of the research is on the fundamental elements influencing the choice of cloud services in the present environment, the identification of extra characteristics of cloud services transcending SMI, and the identification of the most suitable approach for some services. By means of the measurement of customer enjoyment and experience, QoS traits provide some insight on the impact of trust mechanisms on service acceptance. Comparisons of SMI and QoS measurements before and after trust mechanism deployment provide insightful analysis. Empirical research guides these comparisons. This study aims to clarify the interactions among QoS, trust mechanisms, and cloud service adoption as well as highlight the implications these elements have for customers and service providers. Furthermore, presented in this paper is an algorithm using a comprehensive method to trust estimation in order to ascertain the degree of confidence worthiness of certain people.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Web Engineering\",\"volume\":\"23 7\",\"pages\":\"913-971\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Web Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10815700/\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Web Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10815700/","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于对计算服务的旺盛需求及其资源的动态性,服务选择已成为一个突出的挑战。对云服务日益增长的需求使得选择一家以与竞争供应商相匹配的成本提供同等服务和设施的提供商具有挑战性。除了在客户选择云服务的过程中进行教育外,信任机制包括用户评论、声誉系统和认证,有助于提高消费者对云服务的信心。服务度量指数(SMI)提供了一个规范的框架,同时结合了功能和非功能服务质量指标,从而简化了决策。本研究的主要重点是在当前环境中影响云服务选择的基本因素,确定云服务超越SMI的额外特征,以及确定某些服务的最合适方法。通过对顾客享受和体验的测量,QoS特征提供了一些关于信任机制对服务接受的影响的见解。对信任机制部署前后的SMI和QoS度量进行比较,提供了深刻的分析。实证研究指导了这些比较。本研究旨在澄清QoS、信任机制和云服务采用之间的相互作用,并强调这些元素对客户和服务提供商的影响。在此基础上,本文提出了一种利用综合信任估计方法来确定某个人的信任值的算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining the Empirical Relationship Between Quality of Service (QoS) and Trust Mechanisms of Cloud Services
Service selection has emerged as a prominent challenge due to the flourishing demand for computing services and the dynamic nature of its resources. The increasing demand for cloud services makes it challenging to choose a provider offering equal services and facilities at costs that match those of competing providers. Apart from educating customers in the process of choosing cloud services, trust mechanisms include user reviews, reputation systems, and certifications assist to boost consumers' confidence in cloud services. The service measurement index (SMI) offers a disciplined framework combining both functional and non-functional quality of service indicators concurrently, therefore easing decision-making. The main emphasis of the research is on the fundamental elements influencing the choice of cloud services in the present environment, the identification of extra characteristics of cloud services transcending SMI, and the identification of the most suitable approach for some services. By means of the measurement of customer enjoyment and experience, QoS traits provide some insight on the impact of trust mechanisms on service acceptance. Comparisons of SMI and QoS measurements before and after trust mechanism deployment provide insightful analysis. Empirical research guides these comparisons. This study aims to clarify the interactions among QoS, trust mechanisms, and cloud service adoption as well as highlight the implications these elements have for customers and service providers. Furthermore, presented in this paper is an algorithm using a comprehensive method to trust estimation in order to ascertain the degree of confidence worthiness of certain people.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Web Engineering
Journal of Web Engineering 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
62
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The World Wide Web and its associated technologies have become a major implementation and delivery platform for a large variety of applications, ranging from simple institutional information Web sites to sophisticated supply-chain management systems, financial applications, e-government, distance learning, and entertainment, among others. Such applications, in addition to their intrinsic functionality, also exhibit the more complex behavior of distributed applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信