{"title":"头孢地罗与四环素类似物联合对耐碳青霉烯鲍曼不动杆菌的活性研究。","authors":"Yuhan Yin, Na Xu, Xinjie Wang","doi":"10.1038/s41429-024-00801-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Therapeutic options for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CA-AB) are quite limited. Cefiderocol, a novel siderophore cephalosporin, has shown potent in vitro activity against CR-AB, and new tetracycline analogues such as eravacycline and omadacycline have been available in recent years. However, the synergism of cefiderocol with tetracycline analogues against CR-AB has not been well investigated. In this study, we evaluated the in vitro synergistic activity of cefiderocol in combination with tetracycline analogues (minocycline, tigecycline, eravacycline and omadacycline) against 48 clinical isolates of CR-AB by checkerboard methods and time-kill assays. Then we further verified the in vitro results with neutropenic murine thigh-infection models. Among 48 tested isolates tested with checkerboard methods, 35.4%, 33.3%, 50.0% and 37.5% showed synergistic interactions (FICI ≤ 0.5) in cefiderocol-minocycline combination, cefiderocol-tigecycline combination, cefiderocol-eravacycline combination and cefiderocol-omadacycline combination, respectively. None of the combinations exhibited any antagonistic interactions. In the time-kill assays, cefiderocol combined with tetracycline analogues showed synergistic effects in most isolates. Animal models found that combination therapy could reduce cell counts by nearly 2 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/thigh compared with the monotherapy in the AB-2 isolate who was susceptible to minocycline (MIC = 4 mg/l). But for the AB-26 who was resistant to minocycline, the decrease of bacterial cell counts was less than 1 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/thigh compared with cefiderocol monotherapy in the cefiderocol-minocycline, cefiderocol-tigecycline and cefiderocol-omadacycline therapies; while the cefiderocol-eravacycline combination could still reduce the bacterial cell counts nearly 2 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/thigh compared with the monotherapy. In summary, the cefiderocol-eravacycline combination seems to be a promising therapeutic strategy for treating CR-AB infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":54884,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antibiotics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Activity of cefiderocol in combination with tetracycline analogues against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.\",\"authors\":\"Yuhan Yin, Na Xu, Xinjie Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41429-024-00801-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Therapeutic options for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CA-AB) are quite limited. Cefiderocol, a novel siderophore cephalosporin, has shown potent in vitro activity against CR-AB, and new tetracycline analogues such as eravacycline and omadacycline have been available in recent years. However, the synergism of cefiderocol with tetracycline analogues against CR-AB has not been well investigated. In this study, we evaluated the in vitro synergistic activity of cefiderocol in combination with tetracycline analogues (minocycline, tigecycline, eravacycline and omadacycline) against 48 clinical isolates of CR-AB by checkerboard methods and time-kill assays. Then we further verified the in vitro results with neutropenic murine thigh-infection models. Among 48 tested isolates tested with checkerboard methods, 35.4%, 33.3%, 50.0% and 37.5% showed synergistic interactions (FICI ≤ 0.5) in cefiderocol-minocycline combination, cefiderocol-tigecycline combination, cefiderocol-eravacycline combination and cefiderocol-omadacycline combination, respectively. None of the combinations exhibited any antagonistic interactions. In the time-kill assays, cefiderocol combined with tetracycline analogues showed synergistic effects in most isolates. Animal models found that combination therapy could reduce cell counts by nearly 2 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/thigh compared with the monotherapy in the AB-2 isolate who was susceptible to minocycline (MIC = 4 mg/l). But for the AB-26 who was resistant to minocycline, the decrease of bacterial cell counts was less than 1 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/thigh compared with cefiderocol monotherapy in the cefiderocol-minocycline, cefiderocol-tigecycline and cefiderocol-omadacycline therapies; while the cefiderocol-eravacycline combination could still reduce the bacterial cell counts nearly 2 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/thigh compared with the monotherapy. In summary, the cefiderocol-eravacycline combination seems to be a promising therapeutic strategy for treating CR-AB infections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Antibiotics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Antibiotics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41429-024-00801-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antibiotics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41429-024-00801-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Activity of cefiderocol in combination with tetracycline analogues against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.
Therapeutic options for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CA-AB) are quite limited. Cefiderocol, a novel siderophore cephalosporin, has shown potent in vitro activity against CR-AB, and new tetracycline analogues such as eravacycline and omadacycline have been available in recent years. However, the synergism of cefiderocol with tetracycline analogues against CR-AB has not been well investigated. In this study, we evaluated the in vitro synergistic activity of cefiderocol in combination with tetracycline analogues (minocycline, tigecycline, eravacycline and omadacycline) against 48 clinical isolates of CR-AB by checkerboard methods and time-kill assays. Then we further verified the in vitro results with neutropenic murine thigh-infection models. Among 48 tested isolates tested with checkerboard methods, 35.4%, 33.3%, 50.0% and 37.5% showed synergistic interactions (FICI ≤ 0.5) in cefiderocol-minocycline combination, cefiderocol-tigecycline combination, cefiderocol-eravacycline combination and cefiderocol-omadacycline combination, respectively. None of the combinations exhibited any antagonistic interactions. In the time-kill assays, cefiderocol combined with tetracycline analogues showed synergistic effects in most isolates. Animal models found that combination therapy could reduce cell counts by nearly 2 log10 CFU/thigh compared with the monotherapy in the AB-2 isolate who was susceptible to minocycline (MIC = 4 mg/l). But for the AB-26 who was resistant to minocycline, the decrease of bacterial cell counts was less than 1 log10 CFU/thigh compared with cefiderocol monotherapy in the cefiderocol-minocycline, cefiderocol-tigecycline and cefiderocol-omadacycline therapies; while the cefiderocol-eravacycline combination could still reduce the bacterial cell counts nearly 2 log10 CFU/thigh compared with the monotherapy. In summary, the cefiderocol-eravacycline combination seems to be a promising therapeutic strategy for treating CR-AB infections.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Antibiotics seeks to promote research on antibiotics and related types of biologically active substances and publishes Articles, Review Articles, Brief Communication, Correspondence and other specially commissioned reports. The Journal of Antibiotics accepts papers on biochemical, chemical, microbiological and pharmacological studies. However, studies regarding human therapy do not fall under the journal’s scope. Contributions regarding recently discovered antibiotics and biologically active microbial products are particularly encouraged. Topics of particular interest within the journal''s scope include, but are not limited to, those listed below:
Discovery of new antibiotics and related types of biologically active substances
Production, isolation, characterization, structural elucidation, chemical synthesis and derivatization, biological activities, mechanisms of action, and structure-activity relationships of antibiotics and related types of biologically active substances
Biosynthesis, bioconversion, taxonomy and genetic studies on producing microorganisms, as well as improvement of production of antibiotics and related types of biologically active substances
Novel physical, chemical, biochemical, microbiological or pharmacological methods for detection, assay, determination, structural elucidation and evaluation of antibiotics and related types of biologically active substances
Newly found properties, mechanisms of action and resistance-development of antibiotics and related types of biologically active substances.