视觉-数字子宫内膜异位症评分系统(VNESS)用于绘制手术结果:一项验证研究。

IF 1.7 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
S Khazali, B Mondelli, K Fleischer, A Bachi, M Adamczyk, N Lemos, H Krentel, A Vashisht, A Abdalla, A Mohazzab, G Delanerolle, M Possover, R Padmehr, K Shadjoo, G Moawad, T Lee, E Saridogan
{"title":"视觉-数字子宫内膜异位症评分系统(VNESS)用于绘制手术结果:一项验证研究。","authors":"S Khazali, B Mondelli, K Fleischer, A Bachi, M Adamczyk, N Lemos, H Krentel, A Vashisht, A Abdalla, A Mohazzab, G Delanerolle, M Possover, R Padmehr, K Shadjoo, G Moawad, T Lee, E Saridogan","doi":"10.52054/FVVO.16.4.051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several endometriosis classification systems have been proposed and published but the search for a universal language that communicates the complexity, laterality and severity of this disease continues. The authors introduce the Visual-Numeric Endometriosis Scoring System. VNESS is a novel system for describing surgical findings in each compartment of the pelvis in a way that is simple to use, visually intuitive and mirrors a laparoscopic image of the pelvis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess inter-rater reliability for components of VNESS.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The project took the format of a validation study using short surgical laparoscopic video clips. Anonymised video clips of endometriosis procedures were scored by 50 Gynaecologists of varying levels of experience from 12 different countries. The clips were collated from a series of procedures performed between 2012 and 2022. Each participant scored 93 short surgical clips using VNESS. 4650 scores were compared against a reference score and analysis was performed to assess inter-rater reliability.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The outcome measures were percentage agreement between given and reference scores, as well as intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), Cohen Kappa and Quadratic Weighted Kappa Coefficients calculated to evaluate inter-rater reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest and lowest percentage agreement with the reference score was seen in VNESS 4 (full thickness disease, 97% perfect agreement) and VNESS 1 (superficial disease, 53% perfect agreement) respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient showed strong inter-rater reliability for all VNESS compartments except the vagina.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that VNESS has excellent reliability between observers. Correlation is stronger with more severe disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":46400,"journal":{"name":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","volume":"16 4","pages":"429-439"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visual-Numeric Endometriosis Scoring System (VNESS) for mapping surgical findings: A validation study.\",\"authors\":\"S Khazali, B Mondelli, K Fleischer, A Bachi, M Adamczyk, N Lemos, H Krentel, A Vashisht, A Abdalla, A Mohazzab, G Delanerolle, M Possover, R Padmehr, K Shadjoo, G Moawad, T Lee, E Saridogan\",\"doi\":\"10.52054/FVVO.16.4.051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several endometriosis classification systems have been proposed and published but the search for a universal language that communicates the complexity, laterality and severity of this disease continues. The authors introduce the Visual-Numeric Endometriosis Scoring System. VNESS is a novel system for describing surgical findings in each compartment of the pelvis in a way that is simple to use, visually intuitive and mirrors a laparoscopic image of the pelvis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess inter-rater reliability for components of VNESS.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The project took the format of a validation study using short surgical laparoscopic video clips. Anonymised video clips of endometriosis procedures were scored by 50 Gynaecologists of varying levels of experience from 12 different countries. The clips were collated from a series of procedures performed between 2012 and 2022. Each participant scored 93 short surgical clips using VNESS. 4650 scores were compared against a reference score and analysis was performed to assess inter-rater reliability.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The outcome measures were percentage agreement between given and reference scores, as well as intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), Cohen Kappa and Quadratic Weighted Kappa Coefficients calculated to evaluate inter-rater reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest and lowest percentage agreement with the reference score was seen in VNESS 4 (full thickness disease, 97% perfect agreement) and VNESS 1 (superficial disease, 53% perfect agreement) respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient showed strong inter-rater reliability for all VNESS compartments except the vagina.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that VNESS has excellent reliability between observers. Correlation is stronger with more severe disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"429-439\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.16.4.051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.16.4.051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:一些子宫内膜异位症的分类系统已经被提出并发表,但寻找一种通用的语言来传达这种疾病的复杂性、侧侧性和严重性仍在继续。作者介绍了视觉-数字子宫内膜异位症评分系统。VNESS是一种新颖的系统,用于描述骨盆每个隔室的手术结果,使用简单,视觉直观,并反映骨盆的腹腔镜图像。目的:本研究的目的是评估VNESS成分的评分者间信度。材料和方法:本项目采用验证研究的形式,使用外科腹腔镜短视频剪辑。来自12个不同国家的50名不同经验水平的妇科医生对子宫内膜异位症手术的匿名视频片段进行评分。这些片段是从2012年至2022年间进行的一系列手术中整理出来的。每位参与者使用VNESS评分93个短手术夹。将4650分与参考分进行比较,并进行分析以评估评分者之间的信度。主要结果测量指标:结果测量指标是给定分数和参考分数之间的百分比一致性,以及计算用于评估评分者间信度的类内相关系数(ICC)、Cohen Kappa和二次加权Kappa系数。结果:VNESS 4(全厚度疾病,97%完全吻合)和VNESS 1(浅表疾病,53%完全吻合)分别与参考评分吻合的百分比最高和最低。类内相关系数显示,除阴道外,所有VNESS隔室均具有较强的组间信度。结论:本研究提示VNESS在观察者之间具有良好的信度。疾病越严重,相关性越强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Visual-Numeric Endometriosis Scoring System (VNESS) for mapping surgical findings: A validation study.

Background: Several endometriosis classification systems have been proposed and published but the search for a universal language that communicates the complexity, laterality and severity of this disease continues. The authors introduce the Visual-Numeric Endometriosis Scoring System. VNESS is a novel system for describing surgical findings in each compartment of the pelvis in a way that is simple to use, visually intuitive and mirrors a laparoscopic image of the pelvis.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess inter-rater reliability for components of VNESS.

Materials and methods: The project took the format of a validation study using short surgical laparoscopic video clips. Anonymised video clips of endometriosis procedures were scored by 50 Gynaecologists of varying levels of experience from 12 different countries. The clips were collated from a series of procedures performed between 2012 and 2022. Each participant scored 93 short surgical clips using VNESS. 4650 scores were compared against a reference score and analysis was performed to assess inter-rater reliability.

Main outcome measures: The outcome measures were percentage agreement between given and reference scores, as well as intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), Cohen Kappa and Quadratic Weighted Kappa Coefficients calculated to evaluate inter-rater reliability.

Results: The highest and lowest percentage agreement with the reference score was seen in VNESS 4 (full thickness disease, 97% perfect agreement) and VNESS 1 (superficial disease, 53% perfect agreement) respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient showed strong inter-rater reliability for all VNESS compartments except the vagina.

Conclusions: This study suggests that VNESS has excellent reliability between observers. Correlation is stronger with more severe disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn
Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
自引率
15.00%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信