CleftTok: TikTok上的裂隙相关内容分析。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Ethan Richlak, Avery Pope, Mariana Arroyo, Hailey Umbaugh, Canice E Crerand
{"title":"CleftTok: TikTok上的裂隙相关内容分析。","authors":"Ethan Richlak, Avery Pope, Mariana Arroyo, Hailey Umbaugh, Canice E Crerand","doi":"10.1177/10556656241297557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To analyze the content and sources of TikTok posts regarding cleft conditions; to examine the quality and reliability of educational content related to cleft conditions.</p><p><p>Cross-sectional, observational study of cleft-related TikTok content.</p><p><p>N/A.</p><p><p>N/A.</p><p><p>N/A .</p><p><p>Frequencies of TikTok post likes, views, comments, shares, and saves; engagement rate; post themes; and post educational content accuracy, quality, and reliability (assessed with the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool and modified DISCERN [mDISCERN] rating scales).</p><p><p>A total of 252 cleft-related TikTok posts were reviewed. Most posts were created by family members of patients (n = 193, 76.59%), while posts from plastic surgeons were underrepresented (n = 11, 4.37%). Positive Messages were the most common video theme (n = 80; 31.75%), and 24 (9.52%) of the TikTok posts were classified as providing educational content. Plastic surgeons had the highest mDISCERN score (2.75) among all content creator categories, indicating more accurate and reliable educational content. When content creator categories were stratified by physician versus nonphysician creators, physician posts had significantly higher mDISCERN scores (<i>P</i> = .001). Despite objectively better educational content, plastic surgeons had the lowest engagement rate (1.82%), while family members had the highest engagement rate (7.04%).</p><p><p>Cleft teams should anticipate that patients and their caregivers will most likely access social media to learn more about cleft conditions and seek support. Patients and caregivers should be urged to stay cautious of the information they find online and ideally be offered reputable sources of information and support.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":" ","pages":"10556656241297557"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CleftTok: An Analysis of Cleft-Related Content on TikTok.\",\"authors\":\"Ethan Richlak, Avery Pope, Mariana Arroyo, Hailey Umbaugh, Canice E Crerand\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10556656241297557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To analyze the content and sources of TikTok posts regarding cleft conditions; to examine the quality and reliability of educational content related to cleft conditions.</p><p><p>Cross-sectional, observational study of cleft-related TikTok content.</p><p><p>N/A.</p><p><p>N/A.</p><p><p>N/A .</p><p><p>Frequencies of TikTok post likes, views, comments, shares, and saves; engagement rate; post themes; and post educational content accuracy, quality, and reliability (assessed with the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool and modified DISCERN [mDISCERN] rating scales).</p><p><p>A total of 252 cleft-related TikTok posts were reviewed. Most posts were created by family members of patients (n = 193, 76.59%), while posts from plastic surgeons were underrepresented (n = 11, 4.37%). Positive Messages were the most common video theme (n = 80; 31.75%), and 24 (9.52%) of the TikTok posts were classified as providing educational content. Plastic surgeons had the highest mDISCERN score (2.75) among all content creator categories, indicating more accurate and reliable educational content. When content creator categories were stratified by physician versus nonphysician creators, physician posts had significantly higher mDISCERN scores (<i>P</i> = .001). Despite objectively better educational content, plastic surgeons had the lowest engagement rate (1.82%), while family members had the highest engagement rate (7.04%).</p><p><p>Cleft teams should anticipate that patients and their caregivers will most likely access social media to learn more about cleft conditions and seek support. Patients and caregivers should be urged to stay cautious of the information they find online and ideally be offered reputable sources of information and support.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10556656241297557\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241297557\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241297557","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分析抖音中有关“唇腭裂”的内容和来源;目的:探讨腭裂相关教育内容的质量和可靠性。与唇裂相关的TikTok内容的横断面观察研究。n /A.N/A.N/A 。抖音帖子点赞、观看、评论、分享和保存的频率;接触率;文章的主题;以及教育后内容的准确性、质量和可靠性(使用患者教育材料评估工具和修改的DISCERN [mDISCERN]评分量表进行评估)。总共审查了252个与唇腭裂有关的TikTok帖子。 患者家属发帖最多(n = 193, 76.59%),整形外科医生发帖较少(n = 11, 4.37%)。积极信息是最常见的视频主题(n = 80;31.75%), 24条(9.52%)被分类为提供教育内容。在所有内容创造者类别中,整形外科医生的mDISCERN得分最高(2.75分),表明教育内容更加准确可靠。当内容创建者类别按医生和非医生创建者分层时,医生帖子的mDISCERN得分显著较高(P = .001)。虽然客观上教育内容更好,但整形外科医生的参与度最低(1.82%),而家庭成员的参与度最高(7.04%)。唇裂团队应该预料到,患者和他们的护理人员很可能会访问社交媒体,了解更多关于唇裂的情况,并寻求支持。应该敦促患者和护理人员对他们在网上找到的信息保持谨慎,最好是提供有信誉的信息和支持来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CleftTok: An Analysis of Cleft-Related Content on TikTok.

To analyze the content and sources of TikTok posts regarding cleft conditions; to examine the quality and reliability of educational content related to cleft conditions.

Cross-sectional, observational study of cleft-related TikTok content.

N/A.

N/A.

N/A .

Frequencies of TikTok post likes, views, comments, shares, and saves; engagement rate; post themes; and post educational content accuracy, quality, and reliability (assessed with the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool and modified DISCERN [mDISCERN] rating scales).

A total of 252 cleft-related TikTok posts were reviewed. Most posts were created by family members of patients (n = 193, 76.59%), while posts from plastic surgeons were underrepresented (n = 11, 4.37%). Positive Messages were the most common video theme (n = 80; 31.75%), and 24 (9.52%) of the TikTok posts were classified as providing educational content. Plastic surgeons had the highest mDISCERN score (2.75) among all content creator categories, indicating more accurate and reliable educational content. When content creator categories were stratified by physician versus nonphysician creators, physician posts had significantly higher mDISCERN scores (P = .001). Despite objectively better educational content, plastic surgeons had the lowest engagement rate (1.82%), while family members had the highest engagement rate (7.04%).

Cleft teams should anticipate that patients and their caregivers will most likely access social media to learn more about cleft conditions and seek support. Patients and caregivers should be urged to stay cautious of the information they find online and ideally be offered reputable sources of information and support.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信