皮肤准备对手术部位感染及手术贴布升降的影响。

IF 1.3 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
James W Gant, Josh E Collins, Zachary A Miller, Richard L Einsporn
{"title":"皮肤准备对手术部位感染及手术贴布升降的影响。","authors":"James W Gant, Josh E Collins, Zachary A Miller, Richard L Einsporn","doi":"10.1111/vsu.14198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the influence on surgical site infection (SSI) rates when using 0.7% iodophor and 74% isopropyl alcohol versus 2% chlorhexidine and 70% isopropyl alcohol. To evaluate the adherence of an iodophor-impregnated surgical incise drape when used in conjunction with 0.7% iodophor and 74% isopropyl alcohol.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Combines retrospective control and prospective data.</p><p><strong>Sample population: </strong>This study included dogs and cats, 653 retrospective cases and 435 prospective cases, with 447 incisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The SSI rate of a 2% chlorhexidine and 70% isopropyl alcohol preparation was retrospectively reviewed. The prospective population received 0.7% iodophor and 74% isopropyl alcohol; risk factors for SSI were evaluated and incise drape lift was documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 1.8% difference in SSI between the chlorhexidine group and 0.7% iodophor and 74% isopropyl alcohol group was found (p = .25). The drape lift was 13.2%. Drape lift (p = .026), increased body weight (p = .008), and the use of glutaraldehyde for instrument sterilization (p = .055) were associated with an increased risk of SSI development.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 0.7% iodophor and 74% isopropyl alcohol treatments demonstrated similar effectiveness to 2% chlorhexidine and 70% isopropyl alcohol in skin preparation. Using an iodophor-impregnated drape with 0.7% iodophor and 74% isopropyl alcohol reduced both drape lift and the risk of SSI.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>These findings support the combined use of an incise drape with 0.7% iodophor and 74% isopropyl alcohol preparation, provide evidence against the use of glutaraldehyde, and indicate that heavier patients have an increased risk of SSI.</p>","PeriodicalId":23667,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of skin preparation on surgical site infection and lift of adhesive surgical drapes.\",\"authors\":\"James W Gant, Josh E Collins, Zachary A Miller, Richard L Einsporn\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vsu.14198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the influence on surgical site infection (SSI) rates when using 0.7% iodophor and 74% isopropyl alcohol versus 2% chlorhexidine and 70% isopropyl alcohol. To evaluate the adherence of an iodophor-impregnated surgical incise drape when used in conjunction with 0.7% iodophor and 74% isopropyl alcohol.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Combines retrospective control and prospective data.</p><p><strong>Sample population: </strong>This study included dogs and cats, 653 retrospective cases and 435 prospective cases, with 447 incisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The SSI rate of a 2% chlorhexidine and 70% isopropyl alcohol preparation was retrospectively reviewed. The prospective population received 0.7% iodophor and 74% isopropyl alcohol; risk factors for SSI were evaluated and incise drape lift was documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 1.8% difference in SSI between the chlorhexidine group and 0.7% iodophor and 74% isopropyl alcohol group was found (p = .25). The drape lift was 13.2%. Drape lift (p = .026), increased body weight (p = .008), and the use of glutaraldehyde for instrument sterilization (p = .055) were associated with an increased risk of SSI development.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 0.7% iodophor and 74% isopropyl alcohol treatments demonstrated similar effectiveness to 2% chlorhexidine and 70% isopropyl alcohol in skin preparation. Using an iodophor-impregnated drape with 0.7% iodophor and 74% isopropyl alcohol reduced both drape lift and the risk of SSI.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>These findings support the combined use of an incise drape with 0.7% iodophor and 74% isopropyl alcohol preparation, provide evidence against the use of glutaraldehyde, and indicate that heavier patients have an increased risk of SSI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14198\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14198","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较0.7%碘伏加74%异丙醇与2%氯己定加70%异丙醇对手术部位感染(SSI)发生率的影响。评价碘伏浸渍手术切口布与0.7%碘伏和74%异丙醇联合使用时的依从性。研究设计:结合回顾性对照和前瞻性数据。样本人群:本研究包括狗和猫,653例回顾性病例和435例前瞻性病例,447个切口。方法:对2%氯己定70%异丙醇制剂的SSI率进行回顾性分析。前瞻性人群接受0.7%碘伏和74%异丙醇;评估SSI的危险因素并记录切口悬垂。结果:氯己定组与0.7%碘伏和74%异丙醇组的SSI差异为1.8% (p = 0.25)。悬垂度为13.2%。悬吊(p = 0.026)、体重增加(p = 0.008)和使用戊二醛进行器械消毒(p = 0.055)与SSI发生风险增加相关。结论:0.7%碘伏加74%异丙醇与2%氯己定加70%异丙醇在皮肤制剂中的效果相似。使用含有0.7%碘伏和74%异丙醇的碘伏浸渍布,可降低布吊和SSI的风险。临床意义:这些发现支持0.7%碘伏和74%异丙醇制剂联合使用切口纱布,提供了反对使用戊二醛的证据,并表明体重较重的患者发生SSI的风险增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of skin preparation on surgical site infection and lift of adhesive surgical drapes.

Objective: To determine the influence on surgical site infection (SSI) rates when using 0.7% iodophor and 74% isopropyl alcohol versus 2% chlorhexidine and 70% isopropyl alcohol. To evaluate the adherence of an iodophor-impregnated surgical incise drape when used in conjunction with 0.7% iodophor and 74% isopropyl alcohol.

Study design: Combines retrospective control and prospective data.

Sample population: This study included dogs and cats, 653 retrospective cases and 435 prospective cases, with 447 incisions.

Methods: The SSI rate of a 2% chlorhexidine and 70% isopropyl alcohol preparation was retrospectively reviewed. The prospective population received 0.7% iodophor and 74% isopropyl alcohol; risk factors for SSI were evaluated and incise drape lift was documented.

Results: A 1.8% difference in SSI between the chlorhexidine group and 0.7% iodophor and 74% isopropyl alcohol group was found (p = .25). The drape lift was 13.2%. Drape lift (p = .026), increased body weight (p = .008), and the use of glutaraldehyde for instrument sterilization (p = .055) were associated with an increased risk of SSI development.

Conclusion: The 0.7% iodophor and 74% isopropyl alcohol treatments demonstrated similar effectiveness to 2% chlorhexidine and 70% isopropyl alcohol in skin preparation. Using an iodophor-impregnated drape with 0.7% iodophor and 74% isopropyl alcohol reduced both drape lift and the risk of SSI.

Clinical significance: These findings support the combined use of an incise drape with 0.7% iodophor and 74% isopropyl alcohol preparation, provide evidence against the use of glutaraldehyde, and indicate that heavier patients have an increased risk of SSI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary Surgery
Veterinary Surgery 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
22.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Surgery, the official publication of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons and European College of Veterinary Surgeons, is a source of up-to-date coverage of surgical and anesthetic management of animals, addressing significant problems in veterinary surgery with relevant case histories and observations. It contains original, peer-reviewed articles that cover developments in veterinary surgery, and presents the most current review of the field, with timely articles on surgical techniques, diagnostic aims, care of infections, and advances in knowledge of metabolism as it affects the surgical patient. The journal places new developments in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary to help better understand and evaluate the surgical patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信