通过估计葡萄糖处置率评估的胰岛素抵抗与无糖尿病成人全因死亡和心血管死亡风险之间关系的性别差异

IF 6.1 3区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Haixu Wang , Zeming Zhou , Xiaoxin Liu , Ying Chen
{"title":"通过估计葡萄糖处置率评估的胰岛素抵抗与无糖尿病成人全因死亡和心血管死亡风险之间关系的性别差异","authors":"Haixu Wang ,&nbsp;Zeming Zhou ,&nbsp;Xiaoxin Liu ,&nbsp;Ying Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>We intended to examine the relationship between estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) and risks of all-cause and cardiovascular deaths in non-diabetic adults.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>38,175 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999–2018) were included, and deaths were identified through the National Death Index.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>With a median follow-up of 9.8 years, we found that dose–response relationships between eGDR level and the risk of death differed between genders. In female participants, higher eGDR level was linearly correlated with lower risks of all-cause and cardiovascular deaths. In contrast, among male participants, there were L-shaped relationships between eGDR and risks of all-cause and cardiovascular deaths, with threshold points of 8.50 and 8.49 mg/kg/min, respectively. To the left of threshold points, eGDR was negatively linked with risks of all-cause (HR 0.91, 95 % CI 0.88–0.94, P &lt; 0.001) and cardiovascular deaths (HR 0.87, 95 % CI 0.82–0.93, P &lt; 0.001). After the inflection point, an increase in eGDR was not related to lower risks of all-cause and cardiovascular deaths (P &gt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Higher eGDR level was associated with lower risks of all-cause and cardiovascular deaths in a linear dose–response manner among non-diabetic females, while L-shaped relationships were observed among non-diabetic males.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11249,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 111966"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender differences in the association between insulin resistance assessed by estimated glucose disposal rate and the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular deaths in adults without diabetes\",\"authors\":\"Haixu Wang ,&nbsp;Zeming Zhou ,&nbsp;Xiaoxin Liu ,&nbsp;Ying Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>We intended to examine the relationship between estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) and risks of all-cause and cardiovascular deaths in non-diabetic adults.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>38,175 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999–2018) were included, and deaths were identified through the National Death Index.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>With a median follow-up of 9.8 years, we found that dose–response relationships between eGDR level and the risk of death differed between genders. In female participants, higher eGDR level was linearly correlated with lower risks of all-cause and cardiovascular deaths. In contrast, among male participants, there were L-shaped relationships between eGDR and risks of all-cause and cardiovascular deaths, with threshold points of 8.50 and 8.49 mg/kg/min, respectively. To the left of threshold points, eGDR was negatively linked with risks of all-cause (HR 0.91, 95 % CI 0.88–0.94, P &lt; 0.001) and cardiovascular deaths (HR 0.87, 95 % CI 0.82–0.93, P &lt; 0.001). After the inflection point, an increase in eGDR was not related to lower risks of all-cause and cardiovascular deaths (P &gt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Higher eGDR level was associated with lower risks of all-cause and cardiovascular deaths in a linear dose–response manner among non-diabetic females, while L-shaped relationships were observed among non-diabetic males.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes research and clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"219 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111966\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes research and clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168822724008763\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168822724008763","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们旨在研究非糖尿病成人中估计的葡萄糖处置率(eGDR)与全因和心血管死亡风险之间的关系。方法:纳入1999-2018年全国健康与营养调查(National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey)的38175名参与者,并通过国家死亡指数(National Death Index)确定死亡人数。结果:中位随访时间为9.8年,我们发现eGDR水平与死亡风险之间的剂量-反应关系在性别之间存在差异。在女性参与者中,较高的eGDR水平与较低的全因死亡和心血管死亡风险呈线性相关。相比之下,在男性参与者中,eGDR与全因死亡和心血管死亡风险之间呈l型关系,阈值分别为8.50和8.49 mg/kg/min。在阈值点左侧,eGDR与全因风险呈负相关(HR 0.91, 95 % CI 0.88-0.94, P  0.05)。结论:在非糖尿病女性中,较高的eGDR水平与较低的全因和心血管死亡风险呈线性剂量反应关系,而在非糖尿病男性中则呈l型关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gender differences in the association between insulin resistance assessed by estimated glucose disposal rate and the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular deaths in adults without diabetes

Aim

We intended to examine the relationship between estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) and risks of all-cause and cardiovascular deaths in non-diabetic adults.

Methods

38,175 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999–2018) were included, and deaths were identified through the National Death Index.

Results

With a median follow-up of 9.8 years, we found that dose–response relationships between eGDR level and the risk of death differed between genders. In female participants, higher eGDR level was linearly correlated with lower risks of all-cause and cardiovascular deaths. In contrast, among male participants, there were L-shaped relationships between eGDR and risks of all-cause and cardiovascular deaths, with threshold points of 8.50 and 8.49 mg/kg/min, respectively. To the left of threshold points, eGDR was negatively linked with risks of all-cause (HR 0.91, 95 % CI 0.88–0.94, P < 0.001) and cardiovascular deaths (HR 0.87, 95 % CI 0.82–0.93, P < 0.001). After the inflection point, an increase in eGDR was not related to lower risks of all-cause and cardiovascular deaths (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Higher eGDR level was associated with lower risks of all-cause and cardiovascular deaths in a linear dose–response manner among non-diabetic females, while L-shaped relationships were observed among non-diabetic males.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes research and clinical practice
Diabetes research and clinical practice 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
862
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice is an international journal for health-care providers and clinically oriented researchers that publishes high-quality original research articles and expert reviews in diabetes and related areas. The role of the journal is to provide a venue for dissemination of knowledge and discussion of topics related to diabetes clinical research and patient care. Topics of focus include translational science, genetics, immunology, nutrition, psychosocial research, epidemiology, prevention, socio-economic research, complications, new treatments, technologies and therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信