群体反应限制分析中运动员练习偏好的检验

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Julie C. Crochet, Kwadwo O. Britwum, Griffin W. Rooker, Elizabeth T. Parthum
{"title":"群体反应限制分析中运动员练习偏好的检验","authors":"Julie C. Crochet,&nbsp;Kwadwo O. Britwum,&nbsp;Griffin W. Rooker,&nbsp;Elizabeth T. Parthum","doi":"10.1002/bin.2073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Two assessments derived from the applied behavior analysis (ABA) literature were conducted to understand rugby players' preferences for drills and the context in which their engagement was inconsistent. First, 32 female varsity rugby players aged 18 to 25 participated in a survey-based preference assessment. Next, 20 of the same players participated in an on-field response restriction (RR) preference assessment. Results from the survey-based preference assessment and the on-field response restriction preference assessment were consistent. Specifically, offensive and no-to-light contact drills were preferred over defensive and heavy contact drills. Implications of these findings are discussed in the context of group-based preference assessments and how using ABA procedures may benefit varsity sports coaching to improve athlete performance.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47138,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Interventions","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examination of Athletes' Preferences for Practice Drills in a Group Response Restriction Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Julie C. Crochet,&nbsp;Kwadwo O. Britwum,&nbsp;Griffin W. Rooker,&nbsp;Elizabeth T. Parthum\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bin.2073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Two assessments derived from the applied behavior analysis (ABA) literature were conducted to understand rugby players' preferences for drills and the context in which their engagement was inconsistent. First, 32 female varsity rugby players aged 18 to 25 participated in a survey-based preference assessment. Next, 20 of the same players participated in an on-field response restriction (RR) preference assessment. Results from the survey-based preference assessment and the on-field response restriction preference assessment were consistent. Specifically, offensive and no-to-light contact drills were preferred over defensive and heavy contact drills. Implications of these findings are discussed in the context of group-based preference assessments and how using ABA procedures may benefit varsity sports coaching to improve athlete performance.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Interventions\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bin.2073\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bin.2073","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从应用行为分析(ABA)文献中得出了两项评估,以了解橄榄球运动员对训练的偏好以及他们参与不一致的背景。首先,32名年龄在18至25岁之间的橄榄球校队女运动员参加了一项基于调查的偏好评估。接下来,20名相同的球员参加了现场反应限制(RR)偏好评估。基于调查的偏好评估结果与现场反应限制偏好评估结果一致。具体来说,进攻和非轻接触训练比防守和重接触训练更受欢迎。这些发现的含义在基于群体的偏好评估的背景下进行了讨论,以及如何使用ABA程序可能有利于大学体育教练提高运动员的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examination of Athletes' Preferences for Practice Drills in a Group Response Restriction Analysis

Two assessments derived from the applied behavior analysis (ABA) literature were conducted to understand rugby players' preferences for drills and the context in which their engagement was inconsistent. First, 32 female varsity rugby players aged 18 to 25 participated in a survey-based preference assessment. Next, 20 of the same players participated in an on-field response restriction (RR) preference assessment. Results from the survey-based preference assessment and the on-field response restriction preference assessment were consistent. Specifically, offensive and no-to-light contact drills were preferred over defensive and heavy contact drills. Implications of these findings are discussed in the context of group-based preference assessments and how using ABA procedures may benefit varsity sports coaching to improve athlete performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral Interventions
Behavioral Interventions PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Behavioral Interventions aims to report research and practice involving the utilization of behavioral techniques in the treatment, education, assessment and training of students, clients or patients, as well as training techniques used with staff. Behavioral Interventions publishes: (1) research articles, (2) brief reports (a short report of an innovative technique or intervention that may be less rigorous than a research report), (3) topical literature reviews and discussion articles, (4) book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信