严峻环境下的气道管理:插管并不总是最好的选择。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Nicholas E Weinberg, Nicholas J Daniel, Stephanie A Lareau, James H Elder, Ken Zafren
{"title":"严峻环境下的气道管理:插管并不总是最好的选择。","authors":"Nicholas E Weinberg, Nicholas J Daniel, Stephanie A Lareau, James H Elder, Ken Zafren","doi":"10.1177/10806032241301047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Management of the airway in austere environments can differ substantially from standard in-hospital airway management. Devices such as nasopharyngeal airways, oropharyngeal airways, endotracheal tubes, extraglottic airways, ventilators, and sedative and paralytic medications may not be available. Weather, scene hazards, difficulties of extrication, transport times, skill sets of rescuers, and availability of advanced equipment are highly variable. Standard decision-making processes and guidelines, such as intubation for Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤ 8, are not always optimal in austere settings. Airway management in austere settings involves many variables leading to complex decision-making. We present 2 cases in which airway management likely would have been similar in hospital settings but differed in austere environments based on the available resources. We discuss current concepts and methods for airway management in austere environments with a review of the pertinent literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":49360,"journal":{"name":"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"10806032241301047"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Airway Management in Austere Settings: Intubation Is Not Always the Best Option.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas E Weinberg, Nicholas J Daniel, Stephanie A Lareau, James H Elder, Ken Zafren\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10806032241301047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Management of the airway in austere environments can differ substantially from standard in-hospital airway management. Devices such as nasopharyngeal airways, oropharyngeal airways, endotracheal tubes, extraglottic airways, ventilators, and sedative and paralytic medications may not be available. Weather, scene hazards, difficulties of extrication, transport times, skill sets of rescuers, and availability of advanced equipment are highly variable. Standard decision-making processes and guidelines, such as intubation for Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤ 8, are not always optimal in austere settings. Airway management in austere settings involves many variables leading to complex decision-making. We present 2 cases in which airway management likely would have been similar in hospital settings but differed in austere environments based on the available resources. We discuss current concepts and methods for airway management in austere environments with a review of the pertinent literature.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10806032241301047\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10806032241301047\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10806032241301047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

恶劣环境下的气道管理可能与标准的院内气道管理有很大不同。鼻咽气道、口咽气道、气管内管、声门外气道、呼吸机、镇静和麻痹药物等设备可能不可用。天气、现场危险、救援困难、运输时间、救援人员的技能和先进设备的可用性都是高度可变的。标准的决策过程和指南,如格拉斯哥昏迷评分≤8分的插管,在严峻的环境中并不总是最佳的。在严峻环境下的气道管理涉及许多导致复杂决策的变量。我们提出了2例病例,其中气道管理可能在医院环境中相似,但在基于可用资源的严峻环境中有所不同。我们讨论当前的概念和方法气道管理在严峻的环境与相关文献的回顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Airway Management in Austere Settings: Intubation Is Not Always the Best Option.

Management of the airway in austere environments can differ substantially from standard in-hospital airway management. Devices such as nasopharyngeal airways, oropharyngeal airways, endotracheal tubes, extraglottic airways, ventilators, and sedative and paralytic medications may not be available. Weather, scene hazards, difficulties of extrication, transport times, skill sets of rescuers, and availability of advanced equipment are highly variable. Standard decision-making processes and guidelines, such as intubation for Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤ 8, are not always optimal in austere settings. Airway management in austere settings involves many variables leading to complex decision-making. We present 2 cases in which airway management likely would have been similar in hospital settings but differed in austere environments based on the available resources. We discuss current concepts and methods for airway management in austere environments with a review of the pertinent literature.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wilderness & Environmental Medicine, the official journal of the Wilderness Medical Society, is the leading journal for physicians practicing medicine in austere environments. This quarterly journal features articles on all aspects of wilderness medicine, including high altitude and climbing, cold- and heat-related phenomena, natural environmental disasters, immersion and near-drowning, diving, and barotrauma, hazardous plants/animals/insects/marine animals, animal attacks, search and rescue, ethical and legal issues, aeromedial transport, survival physiology, medicine in remote environments, travel medicine, operational medicine, and wilderness trauma management. It presents original research and clinical reports from scientists and practitioners around the globe. WEM invites submissions from authors who want to take advantage of our established publication''s unique scope, wide readership, and international recognition in the field of wilderness medicine. Its readership is a diverse group of medical and outdoor professionals who choose WEM as their primary wilderness medical resource.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信