菲律宾裔美国人社区参与预防研究的方法:范围审查

IF 5.4 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Jon Torres, Emiko Tajima
{"title":"菲律宾裔美国人社区参与预防研究的方法:范围审查","authors":"Jon Torres, Emiko Tajima","doi":"10.1177/15248380241299435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The topic of this scoping review is the use of targeted engagement methods to engage Filipino Americans (FAs) in prevention research studies. FAs are the third largest Asian subgroup in the United States. Given the historical relationship between the Philippines and United States, FAs are often under-represented in research and are hard to reach due to factors such as cultural mistrust, linguistic mismatch, and unfamiliarity with research. This scoping review synthesized findings across 11 studies which met the criteria for inclusion. Studies were included if they demonstrated engagement methods with FA communities, applied participatory action research methods, cultural adaptations, and/or stakeholder consultation. Studies were excluded if engagement was not identified as a focus, did not involve stakeholders in recruitment, were simply published as extensions of earlier studies, conducted outside of the United States, or not in English. Studies reviewed represent a range of research designs, including randomized controlled trials, intervention adapted research, needs assessments, semi-structured interviews, qualitative studies, program evaluation research, and community-based participatory research. Findings identified a range of methods and strategies for engaging FA in research. Integration of cultural values, recruiting from cultural sites and use of bilingual staff and moderators were most often utilized. In addition, this review highlighted barriers to engagement and strategies to address them. Using culturally congruent engagement strategies will aid researchers in building trust and encourage participation.","PeriodicalId":54211,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Approaches to Filipino American Community Engagement in Prevention Research: A Scoping Review\",\"authors\":\"Jon Torres, Emiko Tajima\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15248380241299435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The topic of this scoping review is the use of targeted engagement methods to engage Filipino Americans (FAs) in prevention research studies. FAs are the third largest Asian subgroup in the United States. Given the historical relationship between the Philippines and United States, FAs are often under-represented in research and are hard to reach due to factors such as cultural mistrust, linguistic mismatch, and unfamiliarity with research. This scoping review synthesized findings across 11 studies which met the criteria for inclusion. Studies were included if they demonstrated engagement methods with FA communities, applied participatory action research methods, cultural adaptations, and/or stakeholder consultation. Studies were excluded if engagement was not identified as a focus, did not involve stakeholders in recruitment, were simply published as extensions of earlier studies, conducted outside of the United States, or not in English. Studies reviewed represent a range of research designs, including randomized controlled trials, intervention adapted research, needs assessments, semi-structured interviews, qualitative studies, program evaluation research, and community-based participatory research. Findings identified a range of methods and strategies for engaging FA in research. Integration of cultural values, recruiting from cultural sites and use of bilingual staff and moderators were most often utilized. In addition, this review highlighted barriers to engagement and strategies to address them. Using culturally congruent engagement strategies will aid researchers in building trust and encourage participation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trauma Violence & Abuse\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trauma Violence & Abuse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241299435\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241299435","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本综述的主题是使用有针对性的参与方法来吸引菲律宾裔美国人(FAs)参与预防研究。FAs是美国第三大亚裔群体。鉴于菲律宾和美国之间的历史关系,由于文化不信任、语言不匹配和对研究不熟悉等因素,FAs在研究中的代表性往往不足,而且很难达到。本综述综合了符合纳入标准的11项研究的结果。如果研究展示了与FA社区的参与方法,应用参与性行动研究方法,文化适应和/或利益相关者咨询,则纳入研究。如果研究没有将参与确定为重点,没有涉及招聘的利益相关者,只是作为早期研究的延伸发表,在美国以外进行,或者不是用英语进行,则排除研究。所回顾的研究代表了一系列的研究设计,包括随机对照试验、干预适应性研究、需求评估、半结构化访谈、定性研究、项目评估研究和基于社区的参与性研究。研究结果确定了一系列让FA参与研究的方法和策略。最常用的办法是整合文化价值、从文化场所征聘人员和使用双语工作人员和主持人。此外,该审查还强调了参与的障碍和解决这些障碍的战略。使用文化一致的参与策略将有助于研究人员建立信任并鼓励参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Approaches to Filipino American Community Engagement in Prevention Research: A Scoping Review
The topic of this scoping review is the use of targeted engagement methods to engage Filipino Americans (FAs) in prevention research studies. FAs are the third largest Asian subgroup in the United States. Given the historical relationship between the Philippines and United States, FAs are often under-represented in research and are hard to reach due to factors such as cultural mistrust, linguistic mismatch, and unfamiliarity with research. This scoping review synthesized findings across 11 studies which met the criteria for inclusion. Studies were included if they demonstrated engagement methods with FA communities, applied participatory action research methods, cultural adaptations, and/or stakeholder consultation. Studies were excluded if engagement was not identified as a focus, did not involve stakeholders in recruitment, were simply published as extensions of earlier studies, conducted outside of the United States, or not in English. Studies reviewed represent a range of research designs, including randomized controlled trials, intervention adapted research, needs assessments, semi-structured interviews, qualitative studies, program evaluation research, and community-based participatory research. Findings identified a range of methods and strategies for engaging FA in research. Integration of cultural values, recruiting from cultural sites and use of bilingual staff and moderators were most often utilized. In addition, this review highlighted barriers to engagement and strategies to address them. Using culturally congruent engagement strategies will aid researchers in building trust and encourage participation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
7.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is devoted to organizing, synthesizing, and expanding knowledge on all force of trauma, abuse, and violence. This peer-reviewed journal is practitioner oriented and will publish only reviews of research, conceptual or theoretical articles, and law review articles. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is dedicated to professionals and advanced students in clinical training who work with any form of trauma, abuse, and violence. It is intended to compile knowledge that clearly affects practice, policy, and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信