验证经济实惠的便携式国际视觉系统(Visionkeys)的视力和立体感。

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2024-12-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S494457
Lily A Karlberg, Taylor R Sweeney, Robert W Arnold
{"title":"验证经济实惠的便携式国际视觉系统(Visionkeys)的视力和立体感。","authors":"Lily A Karlberg, Taylor R Sweeney, Robert W Arnold","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S494457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A new, portable computerized distance vision testing (screen plus remote) system called VisionKeys has been developed by the missions equipment developer EyeMobil so we validated it compared to conventional research testing devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a standardized protocol of surround HOTV optotype presentation, the VisionKeys was compared to M&S for patched monocular distance visual acuity. A different VisionKeys function with anaglyph spectacle distance stereopsis was compared to near stereo on Titmus circles with Polaroid goggles and PDI Check on an autostereoscopic screen. Raw scores were converted to logarithm and compared with non-parametric and Bland Altman tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 145 ethnically diverse patients with range of acuity -0.4 to 2.6 (NLP) logMAR from a pediatric eye and adult strabismus practice showing median logMAR acuity of 0.0 with VisionKeys significantly finer resolution than 0.1 for M&S (Mann-Whitney z=2.6, p=0.01, n=290). VisionKeys acuity correlated very well with M&S and children under age 7 scored coarser than teens and young adults. Median distance log arc seconds stereo on VisionKeys (2.00) differed from near Titmus circles (1.78) and PDI Check (1.89, Kruskal-Wallis X2(2)=9.8, p=0.007) however they all correlated well by Bland Altman.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new, portable VisionKeys system gives valid distance visual acuity with slightly finer estimate compared to M&S and the distance stereo compared well with near Titmus and PDI Check. As such, it should be valuable for testing children and adults in remote locations.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"18 ","pages":"3667-3677"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11645953/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Affordable, Portable International Visionkeys System for Visual Acuity and Stereopsis.\",\"authors\":\"Lily A Karlberg, Taylor R Sweeney, Robert W Arnold\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OPTH.S494457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A new, portable computerized distance vision testing (screen plus remote) system called VisionKeys has been developed by the missions equipment developer EyeMobil so we validated it compared to conventional research testing devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a standardized protocol of surround HOTV optotype presentation, the VisionKeys was compared to M&S for patched monocular distance visual acuity. A different VisionKeys function with anaglyph spectacle distance stereopsis was compared to near stereo on Titmus circles with Polaroid goggles and PDI Check on an autostereoscopic screen. Raw scores were converted to logarithm and compared with non-parametric and Bland Altman tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 145 ethnically diverse patients with range of acuity -0.4 to 2.6 (NLP) logMAR from a pediatric eye and adult strabismus practice showing median logMAR acuity of 0.0 with VisionKeys significantly finer resolution than 0.1 for M&S (Mann-Whitney z=2.6, p=0.01, n=290). VisionKeys acuity correlated very well with M&S and children under age 7 scored coarser than teens and young adults. Median distance log arc seconds stereo on VisionKeys (2.00) differed from near Titmus circles (1.78) and PDI Check (1.89, Kruskal-Wallis X2(2)=9.8, p=0.007) however they all correlated well by Bland Altman.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new, portable VisionKeys system gives valid distance visual acuity with slightly finer estimate compared to M&S and the distance stereo compared well with near Titmus and PDI Check. As such, it should be valuable for testing children and adults in remote locations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"3667-3677\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11645953/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S494457\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S494457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:任务设备开发商 EyeMobil 开发了一种名为 VisionKeys 的新型便携式计算机化远距离视力测试(屏幕加遥控器)系统,因此我们将其与传统的研究测试设备进行了比较验证:方法: 使用环绕 HOTV 光型演示的标准化协议,将 VisionKeys 与 M&S 的单眼距离视敏度进行比较。将 VisionKeys 的不同功能与戴着宝丽来护目镜的 Titmus 圆圈上的近立体和自动立体屏幕上的 PDI 检查进行了比较。原始分数被转换成对数,并通过非参数检验和布兰德-阿尔特曼检验进行比较:我们招募了145名来自不同种族的患者,他们的视力范围为-0.4至2.6(NLP)logMAR,来自一家小儿眼科和成人斜视诊所,显示中位logMAR视力为0.0,VisionKeys的分辨率明显比M&S的0.1更精细(Mann-Whitney z=2.6,p=0.01,n=290)。VisionKeys 的敏锐度与 M&S 的敏锐度有很好的相关性,7 岁以下儿童的评分比青少年和年轻成人要粗。VisionKeys 的中位距离对数弧秒立体视(2.00)与近距离 Titmus 圆(1.78)和 PDI 检查(1.89,Kruskal-Wallis X2(2)=9.8,p=0.007)不同,但它们在 Bland Altman 中的相关性都很好:结论:新的便携式 VisionKeys 系统能提供有效的远距离视力,与 M&S 系统相比,其估计值略微精细,而且远距离立体视力与近距离 Titmus 和 PDI 检查相比也很好。因此,该系统对偏远地区的儿童和成人测试很有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of the Affordable, Portable International Visionkeys System for Visual Acuity and Stereopsis.

Background: A new, portable computerized distance vision testing (screen plus remote) system called VisionKeys has been developed by the missions equipment developer EyeMobil so we validated it compared to conventional research testing devices.

Methods: Using a standardized protocol of surround HOTV optotype presentation, the VisionKeys was compared to M&S for patched monocular distance visual acuity. A different VisionKeys function with anaglyph spectacle distance stereopsis was compared to near stereo on Titmus circles with Polaroid goggles and PDI Check on an autostereoscopic screen. Raw scores were converted to logarithm and compared with non-parametric and Bland Altman tests.

Results: We recruited 145 ethnically diverse patients with range of acuity -0.4 to 2.6 (NLP) logMAR from a pediatric eye and adult strabismus practice showing median logMAR acuity of 0.0 with VisionKeys significantly finer resolution than 0.1 for M&S (Mann-Whitney z=2.6, p=0.01, n=290). VisionKeys acuity correlated very well with M&S and children under age 7 scored coarser than teens and young adults. Median distance log arc seconds stereo on VisionKeys (2.00) differed from near Titmus circles (1.78) and PDI Check (1.89, Kruskal-Wallis X2(2)=9.8, p=0.007) however they all correlated well by Bland Altman.

Conclusion: The new, portable VisionKeys system gives valid distance visual acuity with slightly finer estimate compared to M&S and the distance stereo compared well with near Titmus and PDI Check. As such, it should be valuable for testing children and adults in remote locations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信