IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Journal of thoracic disease Pub Date : 2024-11-30 Epub Date: 2024-11-29 DOI:10.21037/jtd-24-933
Tsutomu Koyama, Kimihiro Shimizu, Shuji Mishima, Shunichiro Matsuoka, Tetsu Takeda, Kentaro Miura, Hiroyuki Agatsuma, Takashi Eguchi, Kazutoshi Hamanaka, Kazuo Yoshida
{"title":"Investigation of pure lung microbiota in patients with lung cancer after eliminating upper airway contamination: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Tsutomu Koyama, Kimihiro Shimizu, Shuji Mishima, Shunichiro Matsuoka, Tetsu Takeda, Kentaro Miura, Hiroyuki Agatsuma, Takashi Eguchi, Kazutoshi Hamanaka, Kazuo Yoshida","doi":"10.21037/jtd-24-933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While the relationship between gut microbiota and gastrointestinal cancer has been elucidated, the relationship between lung microbiota and lung cancer remains unclear. Previous study findings are inconclusive due to the possibility of contamination by upper airway microbiota in samples obtained from the oropharynx, such as saliva and sputum, and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) collected during bronchoscopy. Therefore, this study aimed to detect pure lung microbiota in patients with lung cancer using BALF samples from resected lung specimens. Additionally, we aimed to evaluate the lung microbiota to clarify their relationship with lung cancer and aid in postoperative pneumonia (POP) prevention and treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study enrolled patients with clinically suspected lung cancer who underwent surgical resection at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Suwa Hospital, between April 2020 and March 2022. BALF from resected lung specimens collected under sterile conditions were used for high-throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS) and bacterial culture analyses. Pure lung microbiota were identified, and their abundance ratio was analyzed. Additionally, we performed α-diversity analysis and explored the relationship between microbiota and POP by comparing our findings with previous literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among samples collected from 54 included cases, bacteria were detected in 13 samples (24.1%) via bacterial culture and in all samples via NGS. Candidate Phylum OD1 bacteria (OD1) was present in a large proportion of samples (phylum level). The major bacteria genera, with a relative abundance ratio (each bacterial read amount/total bacterial read amount) >1% in at least one sample, included <i>Aquabacterium, Acinetobacter</i>, and <i>Ralstonia</i>. Additionally, bacteria widely recognized as pathogens of POP were detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our lung microbiota sampling method eliminated contamination from upper airway microbiota, allowing detection of pure lung microbiota. This study provides baseline data on pure lung microbiota and highlights the need for further research to explore the role of OD1 in lung cancer, which was previously unreported in lung microbiota. Although the pathogens of POP can be aspirated post-hospitalization, they could already exist as lung microbiota pre-hospitalization. Further investigation is needed to substantiate our results and hypothesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":17542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of thoracic disease","volume":"16 11","pages":"7329-7341"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11635203/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of thoracic disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-24-933","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然肠道微生物群与胃肠道癌症之间的关系已被阐明,但肺部微生物群与肺癌之间的关系仍不清楚。由于从口咽部采集的样本(如唾液和痰液)以及支气管镜检查时采集的支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)可能受到上呼吸道微生物群的污染,因此以往的研究结果并不确定。因此,本研究旨在利用切除肺部标本的 BALF 样品检测肺癌患者的纯肺微生物群。此外,我们还旨在评估肺部微生物群,以明确它们与肺癌的关系,并帮助术后肺炎(POP)的预防和治疗:这项前瞻性队列研究招募了 2020 年 4 月至 2022 年 3 月期间在日本红十字诹访医院胸外科接受手术切除的临床疑似肺癌患者。在无菌条件下从切除的肺部标本中收集的 BALF 被用于高通量新一代测序(NGS)和细菌培养分析。我们鉴定了纯肺微生物群,并分析了它们的丰度比。此外,我们还进行了α-多样性分析,并通过将我们的研究结果与以往文献进行比较,探讨了微生物群与持久性有机污染物之间的关系:结果:在 54 个纳入病例的样本中,有 13 个样本(24.1%)通过细菌培养检测到细菌,所有样本均通过 NGS 检测到细菌。候选菌门 OD1 细菌(OD1)在大部分样本中都存在(门级)。在至少一个样本中,相对丰度比(每个细菌读数量/细菌总读数量)>1% 的主要细菌属包括水杆菌属、醋杆菌属和拉氏菌属。此外,还检测到了被广泛认为是持久性有机污染物病原体的细菌:结论:我们的肺微生物群采样方法消除了上呼吸道微生物群的污染,可检测纯肺微生物群。这项研究提供了纯肺微生物群的基线数据,并强调了进一步研究探索 OD1 在肺癌中的作用的必要性,而此前肺微生物群中从未报道过 OD1 的作用。虽然持久性有机污染物的病原体可在入院后被吸出,但它们可能在入院前就已作为肺部微生物群存在。要证实我们的结果和假设,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation of pure lung microbiota in patients with lung cancer after eliminating upper airway contamination: a prospective cohort study.

Background: While the relationship between gut microbiota and gastrointestinal cancer has been elucidated, the relationship between lung microbiota and lung cancer remains unclear. Previous study findings are inconclusive due to the possibility of contamination by upper airway microbiota in samples obtained from the oropharynx, such as saliva and sputum, and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) collected during bronchoscopy. Therefore, this study aimed to detect pure lung microbiota in patients with lung cancer using BALF samples from resected lung specimens. Additionally, we aimed to evaluate the lung microbiota to clarify their relationship with lung cancer and aid in postoperative pneumonia (POP) prevention and treatment.

Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled patients with clinically suspected lung cancer who underwent surgical resection at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Suwa Hospital, between April 2020 and March 2022. BALF from resected lung specimens collected under sterile conditions were used for high-throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS) and bacterial culture analyses. Pure lung microbiota were identified, and their abundance ratio was analyzed. Additionally, we performed α-diversity analysis and explored the relationship between microbiota and POP by comparing our findings with previous literature.

Results: Among samples collected from 54 included cases, bacteria were detected in 13 samples (24.1%) via bacterial culture and in all samples via NGS. Candidate Phylum OD1 bacteria (OD1) was present in a large proportion of samples (phylum level). The major bacteria genera, with a relative abundance ratio (each bacterial read amount/total bacterial read amount) >1% in at least one sample, included Aquabacterium, Acinetobacter, and Ralstonia. Additionally, bacteria widely recognized as pathogens of POP were detected.

Conclusions: Our lung microbiota sampling method eliminated contamination from upper airway microbiota, allowing detection of pure lung microbiota. This study provides baseline data on pure lung microbiota and highlights the need for further research to explore the role of OD1 in lung cancer, which was previously unreported in lung microbiota. Although the pathogens of POP can be aspirated post-hospitalization, they could already exist as lung microbiota pre-hospitalization. Further investigation is needed to substantiate our results and hypothesis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of thoracic disease
Journal of thoracic disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
254
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thoracic Disease (JTD, J Thorac Dis, pISSN: 2072-1439; eISSN: 2077-6624) was founded in Dec 2009, and indexed in PubMed in Dec 2011 and Science Citation Index SCI in Feb 2013. It is published quarterly (Dec 2009- Dec 2011), bimonthly (Jan 2012 - Dec 2013), monthly (Jan. 2014-) and openly distributed worldwide. JTD received its impact factor of 2.365 for the year 2016. JTD publishes manuscripts that describe new findings and provide current, practical information on the diagnosis and treatment of conditions related to thoracic disease. All the submission and reviewing are conducted electronically so that rapid review is assured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信