手持式超声波与推车式超声波在评估和诊断腕管综合征方面的比较。

IF 0.3 Q4 SURGERY
Journal of Hand and Microsurgery Pub Date : 2024-09-16 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jham.2024.100159
Shiva D Yagobian, Sean R Wallace, John R Fowler
{"title":"手持式超声波与推车式超声波在评估和诊断腕管综合征方面的比较。","authors":"Shiva D Yagobian, Sean R Wallace, John R Fowler","doi":"10.1016/j.jham.2024.100159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is responsible for over 90 % of median nerve neuropathies. Though a clinical diagnosis, evaluation of nerve conduction via electrodiagnostic studies (EDX) and median nerve cross sectional area (CSA) through sonographic imaging provides supporting evidence and insight into disease severity. The advent of handheld ultrasound devices offers a portable, cost-effective and non-invasive method for median nerve assessment, yet its accuracy compared to traditional cart-based ultrasound has not been assessed in this setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>43 consecutive patients who presented to an outpatient orthopedic clinic within a large academic institution for symptoms consistent with CTS between August 2023 and April 2024 were included. Handheld sonography was performed with the Clarius Convex L20 HD3 8-20 MHz transducer. The GE Venue Go with a 4-20 MHz linear transducer was used for conventional cart-based ultrasound evaluation. A paired <i>t</i>-test was performed to compare the mean cross-sectional area (CSA) measured with the GE machine to the mean CSA measured with the Clarius transducer (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average CSA measurement obtained with the GE was 14.21 ± 4.89 mm<sup>2</sup>. The average CSA measurement obtained with the Clarius handheld transducer was 13.54 ± 4.50 mm<sup>2</sup>. The mean difference between the GE and Clarius groups was 0.62 mm<sup>2</sup> (95 % CI = -1.47 to 2.71), p = 0.55.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CSA measurements of the median nerve obtained by a handheld ultrasound transducer are comparable to those measured by a traditional cart-based ultrasound machine for carpal tunnel diagnosis. The adoption of handheld ultrasounds in clinical settings holds the potential for quicker, more precise diagnoses and broader access to imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":45368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery","volume":"16 5","pages":"100159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632744/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of handheld versus cart-based ultrasound in the evaluation and diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Shiva D Yagobian, Sean R Wallace, John R Fowler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jham.2024.100159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is responsible for over 90 % of median nerve neuropathies. Though a clinical diagnosis, evaluation of nerve conduction via electrodiagnostic studies (EDX) and median nerve cross sectional area (CSA) through sonographic imaging provides supporting evidence and insight into disease severity. The advent of handheld ultrasound devices offers a portable, cost-effective and non-invasive method for median nerve assessment, yet its accuracy compared to traditional cart-based ultrasound has not been assessed in this setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>43 consecutive patients who presented to an outpatient orthopedic clinic within a large academic institution for symptoms consistent with CTS between August 2023 and April 2024 were included. Handheld sonography was performed with the Clarius Convex L20 HD3 8-20 MHz transducer. The GE Venue Go with a 4-20 MHz linear transducer was used for conventional cart-based ultrasound evaluation. A paired <i>t</i>-test was performed to compare the mean cross-sectional area (CSA) measured with the GE machine to the mean CSA measured with the Clarius transducer (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average CSA measurement obtained with the GE was 14.21 ± 4.89 mm<sup>2</sup>. The average CSA measurement obtained with the Clarius handheld transducer was 13.54 ± 4.50 mm<sup>2</sup>. The mean difference between the GE and Clarius groups was 0.62 mm<sup>2</sup> (95 % CI = -1.47 to 2.71), p = 0.55.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CSA measurements of the median nerve obtained by a handheld ultrasound transducer are comparable to those measured by a traditional cart-based ultrasound machine for carpal tunnel diagnosis. The adoption of handheld ultrasounds in clinical settings holds the potential for quicker, more precise diagnoses and broader access to imaging.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery\",\"volume\":\"16 5\",\"pages\":\"100159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632744/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jham.2024.100159\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jham.2024.100159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of handheld versus cart-based ultrasound in the evaluation and diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is responsible for over 90 % of median nerve neuropathies. Though a clinical diagnosis, evaluation of nerve conduction via electrodiagnostic studies (EDX) and median nerve cross sectional area (CSA) through sonographic imaging provides supporting evidence and insight into disease severity. The advent of handheld ultrasound devices offers a portable, cost-effective and non-invasive method for median nerve assessment, yet its accuracy compared to traditional cart-based ultrasound has not been assessed in this setting.

Methods: 43 consecutive patients who presented to an outpatient orthopedic clinic within a large academic institution for symptoms consistent with CTS between August 2023 and April 2024 were included. Handheld sonography was performed with the Clarius Convex L20 HD3 8-20 MHz transducer. The GE Venue Go with a 4-20 MHz linear transducer was used for conventional cart-based ultrasound evaluation. A paired t-test was performed to compare the mean cross-sectional area (CSA) measured with the GE machine to the mean CSA measured with the Clarius transducer (p < 0.05).

Results: The average CSA measurement obtained with the GE was 14.21 ± 4.89 mm2. The average CSA measurement obtained with the Clarius handheld transducer was 13.54 ± 4.50 mm2. The mean difference between the GE and Clarius groups was 0.62 mm2 (95 % CI = -1.47 to 2.71), p = 0.55.

Conclusion: CSA measurements of the median nerve obtained by a handheld ultrasound transducer are comparable to those measured by a traditional cart-based ultrasound machine for carpal tunnel diagnosis. The adoption of handheld ultrasounds in clinical settings holds the potential for quicker, more precise diagnoses and broader access to imaging.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信