与 ANSI/HPS 标准 N13.56 有关的三项发展。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
William Evans
{"title":"与 ANSI/HPS 标准 N13.56 有关的三项发展。","authors":"William Evans","doi":"10.1097/HP.0000000000001921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Three topics related to ANSI/HPS Standard N13.56, Sampling and Monitoring Releases of Airborne Radioactivity in the Workplace, are discussed. First, due to the omission of consideration of the activity's half-life in the standard's continuous particulate air monitor (CPAM) quantitative method, it is possible for concentration estimates produced by that calculation to be underestimated. Second, the concentration estimate found in air grab sampling, as discussed in the standard, is not, as claimed, an average unless the activity is \"long-lived\" (negligible decay during sampling). It is nonetheless possible for this calculation to produce a concentration estimate that is not significantly different from the average, depending on both the half-life of the activity and the sampling time. Third, the issue of when to change the filter for the CPAM method is addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12976,"journal":{"name":"Health physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three Developments Related to ANSI/HPS Standard N13.56.\",\"authors\":\"William Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HP.0000000000001921\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Three topics related to ANSI/HPS Standard N13.56, Sampling and Monitoring Releases of Airborne Radioactivity in the Workplace, are discussed. First, due to the omission of consideration of the activity's half-life in the standard's continuous particulate air monitor (CPAM) quantitative method, it is possible for concentration estimates produced by that calculation to be underestimated. Second, the concentration estimate found in air grab sampling, as discussed in the standard, is not, as claimed, an average unless the activity is \\\"long-lived\\\" (negligible decay during sampling). It is nonetheless possible for this calculation to produce a concentration estimate that is not significantly different from the average, depending on both the half-life of the activity and the sampling time. Third, the issue of when to change the filter for the CPAM method is addressed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001921\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001921","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文讨论了与 ANSI/HPS 标准 N13.56(工作场所空气放射性释放的采样和监测)有关的三个主题。首先,由于该标准的连续微粒空气监测(CPAM)定量方法没有考虑放射性活度的半衰期,因此计算得出的浓度估计值有可能被低估。其次,正如标准中所讨论的那样,在空气抓取采样中发现的浓度估计值并不像所声称的那样是一个平均值,除非该活性物质是 "长寿命 "的(采样过程中的衰减可以忽略不计)。尽管如此,这种计算方法还是有可能得出与平均值相差不大的浓度估计值,这取决于活性物质的半衰期和采样时间。第三,解决了 CPAM 方法何时更换过滤器的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Three Developments Related to ANSI/HPS Standard N13.56.

Abstract: Three topics related to ANSI/HPS Standard N13.56, Sampling and Monitoring Releases of Airborne Radioactivity in the Workplace, are discussed. First, due to the omission of consideration of the activity's half-life in the standard's continuous particulate air monitor (CPAM) quantitative method, it is possible for concentration estimates produced by that calculation to be underestimated. Second, the concentration estimate found in air grab sampling, as discussed in the standard, is not, as claimed, an average unless the activity is "long-lived" (negligible decay during sampling). It is nonetheless possible for this calculation to produce a concentration estimate that is not significantly different from the average, depending on both the half-life of the activity and the sampling time. Third, the issue of when to change the filter for the CPAM method is addressed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health physics
Health physics 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
324
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Physics, first published in 1958, provides the latest research to a wide variety of radiation safety professionals including health physicists, nuclear chemists, medical physicists, and radiation safety officers with interests in nuclear and radiation science. The Journal allows professionals in these and other disciplines in science and engineering to stay on the cutting edge of scientific and technological advances in the field of radiation safety. The Journal publishes original papers, technical notes, articles on advances in practical applications, editorials, and correspondence. Journal articles report on the latest findings in theoretical, practical, and applied disciplines of epidemiology and radiation effects, radiation biology and radiation science, radiation ecology, and related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信