进行性圆锥角膜的定义:系统综述。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Maria A Henriquez, Carolina Larco, Luis Izquierdo
{"title":"进行性圆锥角膜的定义:系统综述。","authors":"Maria A Henriquez, Carolina Larco, Luis Izquierdo","doi":"10.1097/ICO.0000000000003777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify the definitions used for progressive keratoconus in the literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review aimed to identify the definitions used for \"progressive keratoconus\" in the published articles. A comprehensive search from January 2018 to May 2023 was conducted across Cochrane Library, PubMed, Taylor & Francis, Web of Science, and other bibliographic databases at Oftalmosalud, Lima, Peru. The inclusion criteria were articles including patients with keratoconus without any previous surgical procedure and containing the definition of \"progressive keratoconus\" or \"keratoconus progression\" and a sample size greater than 10 eyes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 221 articles were included for analysis. The 3 most frequent parameters to define progression included data from anterior curvature, pachymetry, and refraction used in 97.8% (216/221), 37.6% (83/221), and 32.1% (71/221) of the articles, respectively. Specifically, the most frequent criterion used was maximum keratometry (Kmax), used in 85.5% (189/221) of the articles. Progression was assessed between 6- and 12-month follow-up in 64.7% (143/221) of the articles. Data from posterior cornea were used in only 8.1% (18/221) of the studies. None of the studies included data from the corneal epithelium.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study demonstrates the lack of unified criteria to define progression of keratoconus and an underutilization of the technology described. It also shows that the single point Kmax measurement is the most commonly used criterion, followed by a change in refractive astigmatism and thinning at the thinnest pachymetric point.</p>","PeriodicalId":10710,"journal":{"name":"Cornea","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Definition of Progressive Keratoconus: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Maria A Henriquez, Carolina Larco, Luis Izquierdo\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ICO.0000000000003777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify the definitions used for progressive keratoconus in the literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review aimed to identify the definitions used for \\\"progressive keratoconus\\\" in the published articles. A comprehensive search from January 2018 to May 2023 was conducted across Cochrane Library, PubMed, Taylor & Francis, Web of Science, and other bibliographic databases at Oftalmosalud, Lima, Peru. The inclusion criteria were articles including patients with keratoconus without any previous surgical procedure and containing the definition of \\\"progressive keratoconus\\\" or \\\"keratoconus progression\\\" and a sample size greater than 10 eyes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 221 articles were included for analysis. The 3 most frequent parameters to define progression included data from anterior curvature, pachymetry, and refraction used in 97.8% (216/221), 37.6% (83/221), and 32.1% (71/221) of the articles, respectively. Specifically, the most frequent criterion used was maximum keratometry (Kmax), used in 85.5% (189/221) of the articles. Progression was assessed between 6- and 12-month follow-up in 64.7% (143/221) of the articles. Data from posterior cornea were used in only 8.1% (18/221) of the studies. None of the studies included data from the corneal epithelium.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study demonstrates the lack of unified criteria to define progression of keratoconus and an underutilization of the technology described. It also shows that the single point Kmax measurement is the most commonly used criterion, followed by a change in refractive astigmatism and thinning at the thinnest pachymetric point.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cornea\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cornea\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003777\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cornea","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003777","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定文献中对渐进性角膜病使用的定义:系统性文献综述旨在确定已发表文章中使用的 "渐进性角膜病 "定义。从 2018 年 1 月至 2023 年 5 月,在秘鲁利马 Oftalmosalud 的 Cochrane Library、PubMed、Taylor & Francis、Web of Science 和其他文献数据库中进行了全面检索。纳入标准为:纳入的文章包括既往未接受过任何手术治疗的角膜病患者,并包含 "进展性角膜病 "或 "角膜病进展 "的定义,且样本量大于10只眼睛:共纳入 221 篇文章进行分析。定义进展最常用的 3 个参数包括前曲率、角膜厚度和屈光度数据,分别在 97.8%(216/221)、37.6%(83/221)和 32.1%(71/221)的文章中使用。具体而言,最常用的标准是最大角膜度数(Kmax),有 85.5%(189/221)的文章使用了这一标准。64.7%的文章(143/221)在 6 个月和 12 个月的随访期间对病情进展进行了评估。只有 8.1%(18/221)的研究使用了后角膜的数据。没有一项研究包含角膜上皮的数据:本研究表明,目前还没有统一的标准来定义角膜病的进展,而且所述技术的利用率也不高。研究还表明,单点 Kmax 测量是最常用的标准,其次是屈光散光的变化和最薄测厚点的变薄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Definition of Progressive Keratoconus: A Systematic Review.

Purpose: To identify the definitions used for progressive keratoconus in the literature.

Methods: A systematic literature review aimed to identify the definitions used for "progressive keratoconus" in the published articles. A comprehensive search from January 2018 to May 2023 was conducted across Cochrane Library, PubMed, Taylor & Francis, Web of Science, and other bibliographic databases at Oftalmosalud, Lima, Peru. The inclusion criteria were articles including patients with keratoconus without any previous surgical procedure and containing the definition of "progressive keratoconus" or "keratoconus progression" and a sample size greater than 10 eyes.

Results: A total of 221 articles were included for analysis. The 3 most frequent parameters to define progression included data from anterior curvature, pachymetry, and refraction used in 97.8% (216/221), 37.6% (83/221), and 32.1% (71/221) of the articles, respectively. Specifically, the most frequent criterion used was maximum keratometry (Kmax), used in 85.5% (189/221) of the articles. Progression was assessed between 6- and 12-month follow-up in 64.7% (143/221) of the articles. Data from posterior cornea were used in only 8.1% (18/221) of the studies. None of the studies included data from the corneal epithelium.

Conclusions: The present study demonstrates the lack of unified criteria to define progression of keratoconus and an underutilization of the technology described. It also shows that the single point Kmax measurement is the most commonly used criterion, followed by a change in refractive astigmatism and thinning at the thinnest pachymetric point.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cornea
Cornea 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
354
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: For corneal specialists and for all general ophthalmologists with an interest in this exciting subspecialty, Cornea brings together the latest clinical and basic research on the cornea and the anterior segment of the eye. Each volume is peer-reviewed by Cornea''s board of world-renowned experts and fully indexed in archival format. Your subscription brings you the latest developments in your field and a growing library of valuable professional references. Sponsored by The Cornea Society which was founded as the Castroviejo Cornea Society in 1975.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信