评估耳科手术后耳填塞的必要性:一项随机对照试验。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Otology & Neurotology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004399
Alper Tabaru, Zeliha Kapusuz Gencer, Sahin Ogreden, Salih Akyel, Iskender Bayram
{"title":"评估耳科手术后耳填塞的必要性:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Alper Tabaru, Zeliha Kapusuz Gencer, Sahin Ogreden, Salih Akyel, Iskender Bayram","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the necessity of ear packing in otological operations where the annulus fibrosus is not elevated, focusing on graft success rates and postoperative hearing outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled prospective clinical trial was conducted at a tertiary care hospital involving 200 patients aged 18 years and above undergoing myringoplasty for inactive chronic suppurative otitis media. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either ear packing with absorbable gelatin sponge (Gelfoam®) or no packing. The primary outcome is graft success assessed via microscopic examination at 3 and 6 months post-surgery. Secondary outcomes include hearing gains measured by pure-tone audiometry at 500-, 1000-, 2000-, and 4000-Hz frequencies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 3 months, the graft take rate was 92% in the ear packing group and 90% in the no packing group, with no statistically significant difference ( p = 0.63). At 6 months, the graft take rate was 90% in the packing group and 88% in the no packing group ( p = 0.67). Hearing improvements, as measured by air conduction thresholds, were also similar between the two groups ( p = 0.73).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that myringoplasty without ear packing yields comparable graft take rates and hearing improvements to traditional myringoplasty with ear packing. These findings suggest that omitting ear packing in appropriate cases may simplify the procedure without compromising patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":"156-160"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Necessity of Ear Packing After Otologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Alper Tabaru, Zeliha Kapusuz Gencer, Sahin Ogreden, Salih Akyel, Iskender Bayram\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the necessity of ear packing in otological operations where the annulus fibrosus is not elevated, focusing on graft success rates and postoperative hearing outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled prospective clinical trial was conducted at a tertiary care hospital involving 200 patients aged 18 years and above undergoing myringoplasty for inactive chronic suppurative otitis media. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either ear packing with absorbable gelatin sponge (Gelfoam®) or no packing. The primary outcome is graft success assessed via microscopic examination at 3 and 6 months post-surgery. Secondary outcomes include hearing gains measured by pure-tone audiometry at 500-, 1000-, 2000-, and 4000-Hz frequencies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 3 months, the graft take rate was 92% in the ear packing group and 90% in the no packing group, with no statistically significant difference ( p = 0.63). At 6 months, the graft take rate was 90% in the packing group and 88% in the no packing group ( p = 0.67). Hearing improvements, as measured by air conduction thresholds, were also similar between the two groups ( p = 0.73).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that myringoplasty without ear packing yields comparable graft take rates and hearing improvements to traditional myringoplasty with ear packing. These findings suggest that omitting ear packing in appropriate cases may simplify the procedure without compromising patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"156-160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004399\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004399","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估在纤维环未升高的耳科手术中耳填塞的必要性,重点关注移植物的成功率和术后听力结果。方法:在某三级医院进行随机对照前瞻性临床试验,纳入200例18岁及以上的非活动性慢性化脓性中耳炎患者行鼓膜成形术。患者被随机分配接受可吸收明胶海绵(Gelfoam®)耳填充物或不填充物。术后3个月和6个月通过显微镜检查评估移植物成功与否。次要结果包括在500、1000、2000和4000赫兹频率下纯音测听测量的听力增益。结果:3个月时,耳填塞组植皮率为92%,无填塞组为90%,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.63)。6个月时,填充物组接骨率为90%,未填充物组接骨率为88% (p = 0.67)。通过空气传导阈值测量的听力改善在两组之间也相似(p = 0.73)。结论:本研究表明,无耳填塞的鼓膜成形术与传统的有耳填塞的鼓膜成形术具有相当的移植率和听力改善。这些发现表明,在适当的情况下,省略耳垫可以简化手术过程,而不会影响患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Necessity of Ear Packing After Otologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the necessity of ear packing in otological operations where the annulus fibrosus is not elevated, focusing on graft success rates and postoperative hearing outcomes.

Methods: A randomized controlled prospective clinical trial was conducted at a tertiary care hospital involving 200 patients aged 18 years and above undergoing myringoplasty for inactive chronic suppurative otitis media. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either ear packing with absorbable gelatin sponge (Gelfoam®) or no packing. The primary outcome is graft success assessed via microscopic examination at 3 and 6 months post-surgery. Secondary outcomes include hearing gains measured by pure-tone audiometry at 500-, 1000-, 2000-, and 4000-Hz frequencies.

Results: At 3 months, the graft take rate was 92% in the ear packing group and 90% in the no packing group, with no statistically significant difference ( p = 0.63). At 6 months, the graft take rate was 90% in the packing group and 88% in the no packing group ( p = 0.67). Hearing improvements, as measured by air conduction thresholds, were also similar between the two groups ( p = 0.73).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that myringoplasty without ear packing yields comparable graft take rates and hearing improvements to traditional myringoplasty with ear packing. These findings suggest that omitting ear packing in appropriate cases may simplify the procedure without compromising patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信