下颌骨放射性坏死腔隙的分形分析与评价:与对照组的横断面研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Brazilian oral research Pub Date : 2024-12-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0114
Natália Santos Barcelos, Cláudia Borges Brasileiro, Lucas Guimarães Abreu, Elismauro Francisco Mendonça, Sebastião Silvério Sousa-Neto, Sílvia Ferreira de Sousa, Ricardo Alves Mesquita, Patrícia Carlos Caldeira
{"title":"下颌骨放射性坏死腔隙的分形分析与评价:与对照组的横断面研究。","authors":"Natália Santos Barcelos, Cláudia Borges Brasileiro, Lucas Guimarães Abreu, Elismauro Francisco Mendonça, Sebastião Silvério Sousa-Neto, Sílvia Ferreira de Sousa, Ricardo Alves Mesquita, Patrícia Carlos Caldeira","doi":"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to evaluate the fractal dimension (FD) and lacunarity of the mandibular bone, comparing patients with and without osteoradionecrosis (ORN). In a cross-sectional study with a control group, 25 patients were included and divided into a case group (with ORN, n = 14) and a control group (without ORN, n = 11). A digital panoramic radiograph taken after the end of radiotherapy (RT) was evaluated for each patient. FD and lacunarity of the mandibular bone were determined using ImageJ software. Descriptive, bivariate, and ROC curve analyses were performed. Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated. Significance was established at p < 0.05. The mean FD and lacunarity values were not significantly different between the groups. The area under the curve for FD and lacunarity were 0.579 and 0.661, respectively. The cut-off point for FD was ≤1.1714 and for lacunarity, > 0.3821, correctly classifying the majority of cases and controls. Most participants in the case group (63.6%) had a FD ≤ 1.1714 and the majority of participants in the control group (63.6%) had a FD >1.1714 (p = 0.395). For lacunarity, most individuals in the case group (72.7%) had a value > 0.3821 and most participants in the control group (63.6%) had a value ≤ 0.3821 (p = 0.198). In conclusion, the FD and lacunarity values did not show statistically significant differences between patients with and without ORN. However, the moderate and large magnitude of the effects seem to indicate that the results may be clinically relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":9240,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian oral research","volume":"38 ","pages":"e114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11654878/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fractal analysis and assessment of lacunarity in mandibular osteoradionecrosis: a cross-sectional study with control group.\",\"authors\":\"Natália Santos Barcelos, Cláudia Borges Brasileiro, Lucas Guimarães Abreu, Elismauro Francisco Mendonça, Sebastião Silvério Sousa-Neto, Sílvia Ferreira de Sousa, Ricardo Alves Mesquita, Patrícia Carlos Caldeira\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective of this study was to evaluate the fractal dimension (FD) and lacunarity of the mandibular bone, comparing patients with and without osteoradionecrosis (ORN). In a cross-sectional study with a control group, 25 patients were included and divided into a case group (with ORN, n = 14) and a control group (without ORN, n = 11). A digital panoramic radiograph taken after the end of radiotherapy (RT) was evaluated for each patient. FD and lacunarity of the mandibular bone were determined using ImageJ software. Descriptive, bivariate, and ROC curve analyses were performed. Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated. Significance was established at p < 0.05. The mean FD and lacunarity values were not significantly different between the groups. The area under the curve for FD and lacunarity were 0.579 and 0.661, respectively. The cut-off point for FD was ≤1.1714 and for lacunarity, > 0.3821, correctly classifying the majority of cases and controls. Most participants in the case group (63.6%) had a FD ≤ 1.1714 and the majority of participants in the control group (63.6%) had a FD >1.1714 (p = 0.395). For lacunarity, most individuals in the case group (72.7%) had a value > 0.3821 and most participants in the control group (63.6%) had a value ≤ 0.3821 (p = 0.198). In conclusion, the FD and lacunarity values did not show statistically significant differences between patients with and without ORN. However, the moderate and large magnitude of the effects seem to indicate that the results may be clinically relevant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian oral research\",\"volume\":\"38 \",\"pages\":\"e114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11654878/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian oral research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0114\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian oral research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0114","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估分形维数(FD)和下颌骨腔隙,比较有和没有骨放射性坏死(ORN)的患者。在与对照组的横断面研究中,纳入25例患者,分为病例组(有ORN, n = 14)和对照组(无ORN, n = 11)。放疗结束后对每位患者的数字全景x线片进行评估。采用ImageJ软件测定下颌骨FD和间隙。进行描述性、双变量和ROC曲线分析。计算了科恩效应量。p < 0.05具有显著性。平均FD值和间隙值组间差异无统计学意义。FD和空隙度曲线下面积分别为0.579和0.661。FD的截断点为≤1.1714,间隙的截断点为> 0.3821,对大多数病例和对照进行了正确的分类。病例组中大多数参与者(63.6%)的FD≤1.1714,对照组中大多数参与者(63.6%)的FD≤1.1714 (p = 0.395)。对于间隙性,病例组中大多数个体(72.7%)的值为> 0.3821,对照组中大多数参与者(63.6%)的值≤0.3821 (p = 0.198)。综上所述,有无ORN患者的FD和腔隙值无统计学差异。然而,中等和较大的影响似乎表明结果可能与临床相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fractal analysis and assessment of lacunarity in mandibular osteoradionecrosis: a cross-sectional study with control group.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the fractal dimension (FD) and lacunarity of the mandibular bone, comparing patients with and without osteoradionecrosis (ORN). In a cross-sectional study with a control group, 25 patients were included and divided into a case group (with ORN, n = 14) and a control group (without ORN, n = 11). A digital panoramic radiograph taken after the end of radiotherapy (RT) was evaluated for each patient. FD and lacunarity of the mandibular bone were determined using ImageJ software. Descriptive, bivariate, and ROC curve analyses were performed. Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated. Significance was established at p < 0.05. The mean FD and lacunarity values were not significantly different between the groups. The area under the curve for FD and lacunarity were 0.579 and 0.661, respectively. The cut-off point for FD was ≤1.1714 and for lacunarity, > 0.3821, correctly classifying the majority of cases and controls. Most participants in the case group (63.6%) had a FD ≤ 1.1714 and the majority of participants in the control group (63.6%) had a FD >1.1714 (p = 0.395). For lacunarity, most individuals in the case group (72.7%) had a value > 0.3821 and most participants in the control group (63.6%) had a value ≤ 0.3821 (p = 0.198). In conclusion, the FD and lacunarity values did not show statistically significant differences between patients with and without ORN. However, the moderate and large magnitude of the effects seem to indicate that the results may be clinically relevant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信