一枚硬币的两面:F…

IF 3.6 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
L D’Onofrio, P Astone, S Dal Pra, S D’Antonio, M Di Giovanni, R De Rosa, P Leaci, S Mastrogiovanni, L Mirasola, F Muciaccia, C Palomba and L Pierini
{"title":"一枚硬币的两面:F…","authors":"L D’Onofrio, P Astone, S Dal Pra, S D’Antonio, M Di Giovanni, R De Rosa, P Leaci, S Mastrogiovanni, L Mirasola, F Muciaccia, C Palomba and L Pierini","doi":"10.1088/1361-6382/ad94c5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work explores the relation between two data-analysis methods used in the search for continuous gravitational waves in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA data: the -statistic and the 5-vector method. We show that the 5-vector method can be derived from a maximum likelihood framework similar to the -statistic. Our analysis demonstrates that the two methods are statistically equivalent, providing the same detection probability for a given false alarm rate. We extend this comparison to multiple detectors, highlighting differences from the standard approach that simply combines 5-vectors from each detector. In our maximum likelihood approach, each 5-vector is weighted by the observation time and sensitivity of its respective detector, resulting in efficient estimators and analytical distributions for the detection statistic. Additionally, we present the analytical computation of sensitivity for different searches, expressed in terms of the minimum detectable amplitude.","PeriodicalId":10282,"journal":{"name":"Classical and Quantum Gravity","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two sides of the same coin: the F ...\",\"authors\":\"L D’Onofrio, P Astone, S Dal Pra, S D’Antonio, M Di Giovanni, R De Rosa, P Leaci, S Mastrogiovanni, L Mirasola, F Muciaccia, C Palomba and L Pierini\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6382/ad94c5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This work explores the relation between two data-analysis methods used in the search for continuous gravitational waves in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA data: the -statistic and the 5-vector method. We show that the 5-vector method can be derived from a maximum likelihood framework similar to the -statistic. Our analysis demonstrates that the two methods are statistically equivalent, providing the same detection probability for a given false alarm rate. We extend this comparison to multiple detectors, highlighting differences from the standard approach that simply combines 5-vectors from each detector. In our maximum likelihood approach, each 5-vector is weighted by the observation time and sensitivity of its respective detector, resulting in efficient estimators and analytical distributions for the detection statistic. Additionally, we present the analytical computation of sensitivity for different searches, expressed in terms of the minimum detectable amplitude.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Classical and Quantum Gravity\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Classical and Quantum Gravity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ad94c5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Classical and Quantum Gravity","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ad94c5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项工作探讨了在LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA数据中寻找连续引力波时使用的两种数据分析方法之间的关系:-统计和5向量方法。我们表明,5向量方法可以从类似于-统计量的最大似然框架中导出。我们的分析表明,这两种方法在统计上是等效的,对于给定的虚警率提供相同的检测概率。我们将这种比较扩展到多个检测器,突出了与标准方法的区别,该方法简单地结合了来自每个检测器的5个向量。在我们的最大似然方法中,每个5向量由其各自检测器的观测时间和灵敏度加权,从而得到检测统计量的有效估计和分析分布。此外,我们提出了不同搜索灵敏度的解析计算,用最小可探测振幅表示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Two sides of the same coin: the F ...
This work explores the relation between two data-analysis methods used in the search for continuous gravitational waves in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA data: the -statistic and the 5-vector method. We show that the 5-vector method can be derived from a maximum likelihood framework similar to the -statistic. Our analysis demonstrates that the two methods are statistically equivalent, providing the same detection probability for a given false alarm rate. We extend this comparison to multiple detectors, highlighting differences from the standard approach that simply combines 5-vectors from each detector. In our maximum likelihood approach, each 5-vector is weighted by the observation time and sensitivity of its respective detector, resulting in efficient estimators and analytical distributions for the detection statistic. Additionally, we present the analytical computation of sensitivity for different searches, expressed in terms of the minimum detectable amplitude.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Classical and Quantum Gravity 物理-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.60%
发文量
301
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Classical and Quantum Gravity is an established journal for physicists, mathematicians and cosmologists in the fields of gravitation and the theory of spacetime. The journal is now the acknowledged world leader in classical relativity and all areas of quantum gravity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信