圆锥角膜和健康眼单、双Scheimpflug相机两种眼生物计测量后角膜表面的可重复性和Zernike多项式。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Julian Bucur, Klemens Paul Kaiser, Marvin Lucas Biller, Thomas Kohnen, Christoph Martin Lwowski
{"title":"圆锥角膜和健康眼单、双Scheimpflug相机两种眼生物计测量后角膜表面的可重复性和Zernike多项式。","authors":"Julian Bucur, Klemens Paul Kaiser, Marvin Lucas Biller, Thomas Kohnen, Christoph Martin Lwowski","doi":"10.1097/ICO.0000000000003767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the repeatability of posterior corneal surface and Zernike polynomial measurements of 2 different ocular biometers and Scheimpflug devices in keratoconus (KC) and healthy eyes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective, comparative study performed at the Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Germany. Included were KC and healthy eyes. Two consecutive measurements of 1 eye per patient, taken with Galilei G6 (Ziemer, Switzerland) and Pentacam AXL (Oculus, Germany), were analyzed. Repeatability was evaluated for posterior keratometry (K1, K2 and Km), posterior astigmatism, and the following Zernike polynomials: Defocus, Astigmatism, Coma, Trefoil, Spherical Aberration, and root mean square (RMS) total.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both devices showed good repeatability for many of the analyzed parameters with several interclass correlation (ICC) values of 0.96 or above. Regarding the Zernike polynomials, ICC values and the narrowness of the 95% limits of agreement varied in between the devices for each polynomial. In addition, the agreement between both devices was reduced for the Zernike analysis. The only comparable polynomials were Spherical Aberration with a high interdevice ICC of 0.955 and RMS total with a lower ICC of 0.591 (both in the KC group).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regarding the posterior measurements, Pentacam AXL showed higher repeatability in healthy eyes and Galilei G6 in KC eyes. For both devices, the intradevice repeatability was high for most Zernike polynomials. However, the interdevice comparability for Zernike polynomials was reduced to Spherical Aberration and RMS total, with Spherical Aberration showing higher agreement in KC eyes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10710,"journal":{"name":"Cornea","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repeatability of Posterior Corneal Surface Measurements and Zernike Polynomials of Two Ocular Biometers With Single and Dual Scheimpflug Cameras in Keratoconus and Healthy Eyes.\",\"authors\":\"Julian Bucur, Klemens Paul Kaiser, Marvin Lucas Biller, Thomas Kohnen, Christoph Martin Lwowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ICO.0000000000003767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the repeatability of posterior corneal surface and Zernike polynomial measurements of 2 different ocular biometers and Scheimpflug devices in keratoconus (KC) and healthy eyes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective, comparative study performed at the Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Germany. Included were KC and healthy eyes. Two consecutive measurements of 1 eye per patient, taken with Galilei G6 (Ziemer, Switzerland) and Pentacam AXL (Oculus, Germany), were analyzed. Repeatability was evaluated for posterior keratometry (K1, K2 and Km), posterior astigmatism, and the following Zernike polynomials: Defocus, Astigmatism, Coma, Trefoil, Spherical Aberration, and root mean square (RMS) total.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both devices showed good repeatability for many of the analyzed parameters with several interclass correlation (ICC) values of 0.96 or above. Regarding the Zernike polynomials, ICC values and the narrowness of the 95% limits of agreement varied in between the devices for each polynomial. In addition, the agreement between both devices was reduced for the Zernike analysis. The only comparable polynomials were Spherical Aberration with a high interdevice ICC of 0.955 and RMS total with a lower ICC of 0.591 (both in the KC group).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regarding the posterior measurements, Pentacam AXL showed higher repeatability in healthy eyes and Galilei G6 in KC eyes. For both devices, the intradevice repeatability was high for most Zernike polynomials. However, the interdevice comparability for Zernike polynomials was reduced to Spherical Aberration and RMS total, with Spherical Aberration showing higher agreement in KC eyes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cornea\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cornea\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003767\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cornea","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003767","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价两种不同的眼生物计和Scheimpflug装置在圆锥角膜(KC)和健康眼中角膜后表面和Zernike多项式测量的可重复性。方法:这是一项在德国法兰克福歌德大学眼科进行的前瞻性比较研究。包括KC和健康的眼睛。用Galilei G6 (Ziemer,瑞士)和Pentacam AXL (Oculus,德国)连续两次测量每名患者1只眼睛。评估后角度数(K1、K2和Km)、后像散和以下泽尼克多项式的重复性:散焦、像散、彗差、三叶形、球差和均方根(RMS)总。结果:两种仪器对许多分析参数具有良好的重复性,多个类间相关系数(ICC)均在0.96以上。对于泽尼克多项式,ICC值和95%一致性限制的狭窄程度在每个多项式的设备之间有所不同。此外,两个设备之间的协议减少了Zernike分析。唯一可比较的多项式是球差,其器件间ICC高0.955,RMS总ICC低0.591(均在KC组)。结论:在后侧测量中,Pentacam AXL在健康眼具有较高的重复性,Galilei G6在KC眼具有较高的重复性。对于这两种设备,大多数泽尼克多项式的设备内重复性很高。然而,Zernike多项式的设备间可比性被简化为球差和RMS total,其中球差在KC眼睛中显示出更高的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Repeatability of Posterior Corneal Surface Measurements and Zernike Polynomials of Two Ocular Biometers With Single and Dual Scheimpflug Cameras in Keratoconus and Healthy Eyes.

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the repeatability of posterior corneal surface and Zernike polynomial measurements of 2 different ocular biometers and Scheimpflug devices in keratoconus (KC) and healthy eyes.

Methods: This is a prospective, comparative study performed at the Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Germany. Included were KC and healthy eyes. Two consecutive measurements of 1 eye per patient, taken with Galilei G6 (Ziemer, Switzerland) and Pentacam AXL (Oculus, Germany), were analyzed. Repeatability was evaluated for posterior keratometry (K1, K2 and Km), posterior astigmatism, and the following Zernike polynomials: Defocus, Astigmatism, Coma, Trefoil, Spherical Aberration, and root mean square (RMS) total.

Results: Both devices showed good repeatability for many of the analyzed parameters with several interclass correlation (ICC) values of 0.96 or above. Regarding the Zernike polynomials, ICC values and the narrowness of the 95% limits of agreement varied in between the devices for each polynomial. In addition, the agreement between both devices was reduced for the Zernike analysis. The only comparable polynomials were Spherical Aberration with a high interdevice ICC of 0.955 and RMS total with a lower ICC of 0.591 (both in the KC group).

Conclusions: Regarding the posterior measurements, Pentacam AXL showed higher repeatability in healthy eyes and Galilei G6 in KC eyes. For both devices, the intradevice repeatability was high for most Zernike polynomials. However, the interdevice comparability for Zernike polynomials was reduced to Spherical Aberration and RMS total, with Spherical Aberration showing higher agreement in KC eyes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cornea
Cornea 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
354
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: For corneal specialists and for all general ophthalmologists with an interest in this exciting subspecialty, Cornea brings together the latest clinical and basic research on the cornea and the anterior segment of the eye. Each volume is peer-reviewed by Cornea''s board of world-renowned experts and fully indexed in archival format. Your subscription brings you the latest developments in your field and a growing library of valuable professional references. Sponsored by The Cornea Society which was founded as the Castroviejo Cornea Society in 1975.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信