Julian Bucur, Klemens Paul Kaiser, Marvin Lucas Biller, Thomas Kohnen, Christoph Martin Lwowski
{"title":"圆锥角膜和健康眼单、双Scheimpflug相机两种眼生物计测量后角膜表面的可重复性和Zernike多项式。","authors":"Julian Bucur, Klemens Paul Kaiser, Marvin Lucas Biller, Thomas Kohnen, Christoph Martin Lwowski","doi":"10.1097/ICO.0000000000003767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the repeatability of posterior corneal surface and Zernike polynomial measurements of 2 different ocular biometers and Scheimpflug devices in keratoconus (KC) and healthy eyes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective, comparative study performed at the Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Germany. Included were KC and healthy eyes. Two consecutive measurements of 1 eye per patient, taken with Galilei G6 (Ziemer, Switzerland) and Pentacam AXL (Oculus, Germany), were analyzed. Repeatability was evaluated for posterior keratometry (K1, K2 and Km), posterior astigmatism, and the following Zernike polynomials: Defocus, Astigmatism, Coma, Trefoil, Spherical Aberration, and root mean square (RMS) total.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both devices showed good repeatability for many of the analyzed parameters with several interclass correlation (ICC) values of 0.96 or above. Regarding the Zernike polynomials, ICC values and the narrowness of the 95% limits of agreement varied in between the devices for each polynomial. In addition, the agreement between both devices was reduced for the Zernike analysis. The only comparable polynomials were Spherical Aberration with a high interdevice ICC of 0.955 and RMS total with a lower ICC of 0.591 (both in the KC group).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regarding the posterior measurements, Pentacam AXL showed higher repeatability in healthy eyes and Galilei G6 in KC eyes. For both devices, the intradevice repeatability was high for most Zernike polynomials. However, the interdevice comparability for Zernike polynomials was reduced to Spherical Aberration and RMS total, with Spherical Aberration showing higher agreement in KC eyes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10710,"journal":{"name":"Cornea","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repeatability of Posterior Corneal Surface Measurements and Zernike Polynomials of Two Ocular Biometers With Single and Dual Scheimpflug Cameras in Keratoconus and Healthy Eyes.\",\"authors\":\"Julian Bucur, Klemens Paul Kaiser, Marvin Lucas Biller, Thomas Kohnen, Christoph Martin Lwowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ICO.0000000000003767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the repeatability of posterior corneal surface and Zernike polynomial measurements of 2 different ocular biometers and Scheimpflug devices in keratoconus (KC) and healthy eyes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective, comparative study performed at the Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Germany. Included were KC and healthy eyes. Two consecutive measurements of 1 eye per patient, taken with Galilei G6 (Ziemer, Switzerland) and Pentacam AXL (Oculus, Germany), were analyzed. Repeatability was evaluated for posterior keratometry (K1, K2 and Km), posterior astigmatism, and the following Zernike polynomials: Defocus, Astigmatism, Coma, Trefoil, Spherical Aberration, and root mean square (RMS) total.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both devices showed good repeatability for many of the analyzed parameters with several interclass correlation (ICC) values of 0.96 or above. Regarding the Zernike polynomials, ICC values and the narrowness of the 95% limits of agreement varied in between the devices for each polynomial. In addition, the agreement between both devices was reduced for the Zernike analysis. The only comparable polynomials were Spherical Aberration with a high interdevice ICC of 0.955 and RMS total with a lower ICC of 0.591 (both in the KC group).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regarding the posterior measurements, Pentacam AXL showed higher repeatability in healthy eyes and Galilei G6 in KC eyes. For both devices, the intradevice repeatability was high for most Zernike polynomials. However, the interdevice comparability for Zernike polynomials was reduced to Spherical Aberration and RMS total, with Spherical Aberration showing higher agreement in KC eyes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cornea\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cornea\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003767\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cornea","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003767","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评价两种不同的眼生物计和Scheimpflug装置在圆锥角膜(KC)和健康眼中角膜后表面和Zernike多项式测量的可重复性。方法:这是一项在德国法兰克福歌德大学眼科进行的前瞻性比较研究。包括KC和健康的眼睛。用Galilei G6 (Ziemer,瑞士)和Pentacam AXL (Oculus,德国)连续两次测量每名患者1只眼睛。评估后角度数(K1、K2和Km)、后像散和以下泽尼克多项式的重复性:散焦、像散、彗差、三叶形、球差和均方根(RMS)总。结果:两种仪器对许多分析参数具有良好的重复性,多个类间相关系数(ICC)均在0.96以上。对于泽尼克多项式,ICC值和95%一致性限制的狭窄程度在每个多项式的设备之间有所不同。此外,两个设备之间的协议减少了Zernike分析。唯一可比较的多项式是球差,其器件间ICC高0.955,RMS总ICC低0.591(均在KC组)。结论:在后侧测量中,Pentacam AXL在健康眼具有较高的重复性,Galilei G6在KC眼具有较高的重复性。对于这两种设备,大多数泽尼克多项式的设备内重复性很高。然而,Zernike多项式的设备间可比性被简化为球差和RMS total,其中球差在KC眼睛中显示出更高的一致性。
Repeatability of Posterior Corneal Surface Measurements and Zernike Polynomials of Two Ocular Biometers With Single and Dual Scheimpflug Cameras in Keratoconus and Healthy Eyes.
Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the repeatability of posterior corneal surface and Zernike polynomial measurements of 2 different ocular biometers and Scheimpflug devices in keratoconus (KC) and healthy eyes.
Methods: This is a prospective, comparative study performed at the Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Germany. Included were KC and healthy eyes. Two consecutive measurements of 1 eye per patient, taken with Galilei G6 (Ziemer, Switzerland) and Pentacam AXL (Oculus, Germany), were analyzed. Repeatability was evaluated for posterior keratometry (K1, K2 and Km), posterior astigmatism, and the following Zernike polynomials: Defocus, Astigmatism, Coma, Trefoil, Spherical Aberration, and root mean square (RMS) total.
Results: Both devices showed good repeatability for many of the analyzed parameters with several interclass correlation (ICC) values of 0.96 or above. Regarding the Zernike polynomials, ICC values and the narrowness of the 95% limits of agreement varied in between the devices for each polynomial. In addition, the agreement between both devices was reduced for the Zernike analysis. The only comparable polynomials were Spherical Aberration with a high interdevice ICC of 0.955 and RMS total with a lower ICC of 0.591 (both in the KC group).
Conclusions: Regarding the posterior measurements, Pentacam AXL showed higher repeatability in healthy eyes and Galilei G6 in KC eyes. For both devices, the intradevice repeatability was high for most Zernike polynomials. However, the interdevice comparability for Zernike polynomials was reduced to Spherical Aberration and RMS total, with Spherical Aberration showing higher agreement in KC eyes.
期刊介绍:
For corneal specialists and for all general ophthalmologists with an interest in this exciting subspecialty, Cornea brings together the latest clinical and basic research on the cornea and the anterior segment of the eye. Each volume is peer-reviewed by Cornea''s board of world-renowned experts and fully indexed in archival format. Your subscription brings you the latest developments in your field and a growing library of valuable professional references.
Sponsored by The Cornea Society which was founded as the Castroviejo Cornea Society in 1975.