多项选择题中自动干扰因素的产生:系统的文献综述。

IF 3.5 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
PeerJ Computer Science Pub Date : 2024-11-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.7717/peerj-cs.2441
Halim Wildan Awalurahman, Indra Budi
{"title":"多项选择题中自动干扰因素的产生:系统的文献综述。","authors":"Halim Wildan Awalurahman, Indra Budi","doi":"10.7717/peerj-cs.2441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are one of the most used assessment formats. However, creating MCQs is a challenging task, particularly when formulating the distractor. Numerous studies have proposed automatic distractor generation. However, there has been no literature review to summarize and present the current state of research in this field. This study aims to perform a systematic literature review to identify trends and the state of the art of automatic distractor generation studies.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We conducted a systematic literature following the Kitchenham framework. The relevant literature was retrieved from the ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, Science Direct, and Scopus databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 60 relevant studies from 2009 to 2024 were identified and extracted to answer three research questions regarding the data sources, methods, types of questions, evaluation, languages, and domains used in the automatic distractor generation research. The results of the study indicated that automatic distractor generation has been growing with improvement and expansion in many aspects. Furthermore, trends and the state of the art in this topic were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nevertheless, we identified potential research gaps, including the need to explore further data sources, methods, languages, and domains. This study can serve as a reference for future studies proposing research within the field of automatic distractor generation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54224,"journal":{"name":"PeerJ Computer Science","volume":"10 ","pages":"e2441"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11623049/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automatic distractor generation in multiple-choice questions: a systematic literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Halim Wildan Awalurahman, Indra Budi\",\"doi\":\"10.7717/peerj-cs.2441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are one of the most used assessment formats. However, creating MCQs is a challenging task, particularly when formulating the distractor. Numerous studies have proposed automatic distractor generation. However, there has been no literature review to summarize and present the current state of research in this field. This study aims to perform a systematic literature review to identify trends and the state of the art of automatic distractor generation studies.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We conducted a systematic literature following the Kitchenham framework. The relevant literature was retrieved from the ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, Science Direct, and Scopus databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 60 relevant studies from 2009 to 2024 were identified and extracted to answer three research questions regarding the data sources, methods, types of questions, evaluation, languages, and domains used in the automatic distractor generation research. The results of the study indicated that automatic distractor generation has been growing with improvement and expansion in many aspects. Furthermore, trends and the state of the art in this topic were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nevertheless, we identified potential research gaps, including the need to explore further data sources, methods, languages, and domains. This study can serve as a reference for future studies proposing research within the field of automatic distractor generation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PeerJ Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"e2441\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11623049/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PeerJ Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.2441\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PeerJ Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.2441","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:选择题(mcq)是最常用的评估形式之一。然而,创建mcq是一项具有挑战性的任务,特别是在制定分心物时。许多研究都提出了自动干扰物的产生。然而,目前还没有文献综述来总结和介绍这一领域的研究现状。本研究旨在进行系统的文献综述,以确定自动分心物产生研究的趋势和现状。方法:我们按照Kitchenham框架进行了系统的文献研究。相关文献检索自ACM数字图书馆、IEEE explore、Science Direct和Scopus数据库。结果:选取了2009 - 2024年的60篇相关研究,从数据来源、方法、问题类型、评价、语言和领域三个方面回答了自动分心物生成研究的三个研究问题。研究结果表明,自动干扰物的产生在许多方面都在不断改进和扩展。此外,还观察了这一专题的趋势和最新状况。结论:尽管如此,我们发现了潜在的研究差距,包括需要进一步探索数据来源、方法、语言和领域。本研究可为今后在自动干扰物产生领域的研究提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Automatic distractor generation in multiple-choice questions: a systematic literature review.

Background: Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are one of the most used assessment formats. However, creating MCQs is a challenging task, particularly when formulating the distractor. Numerous studies have proposed automatic distractor generation. However, there has been no literature review to summarize and present the current state of research in this field. This study aims to perform a systematic literature review to identify trends and the state of the art of automatic distractor generation studies.

Methodology: We conducted a systematic literature following the Kitchenham framework. The relevant literature was retrieved from the ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, Science Direct, and Scopus databases.

Results: A total of 60 relevant studies from 2009 to 2024 were identified and extracted to answer three research questions regarding the data sources, methods, types of questions, evaluation, languages, and domains used in the automatic distractor generation research. The results of the study indicated that automatic distractor generation has been growing with improvement and expansion in many aspects. Furthermore, trends and the state of the art in this topic were observed.

Conclusions: Nevertheless, we identified potential research gaps, including the need to explore further data sources, methods, languages, and domains. This study can serve as a reference for future studies proposing research within the field of automatic distractor generation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PeerJ Computer Science
PeerJ Computer Science Computer Science-General Computer Science
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: PeerJ Computer Science is the new open access journal covering all subject areas in computer science, with the backing of a prestigious advisory board and more than 300 academic editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信