从南共体区域风险知情城市发展倡议中吸取的经验教训。

IF 1.3 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies Pub Date : 2024-11-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4102/jamba.v16i2.1793
Ketlaodirelang E Letebele, Manuel A A L De Araujo, Johanes A Belle, Frederika A Shigwedha, Lucie N Bakajika, Geofrey Ochieng, Georg Johann, Tlou D Raphela, Jimmy P Yoedsel, Gorata Samuel, Karl H G Sada
{"title":"从南共体区域风险知情城市发展倡议中吸取的经验教训。","authors":"Ketlaodirelang E Letebele, Manuel A A L De Araujo, Johanes A Belle, Frederika A Shigwedha, Lucie N Bakajika, Geofrey Ochieng, Georg Johann, Tlou D Raphela, Jimmy P Yoedsel, Gorata Samuel, Karl H G Sada","doi":"10.4102/jamba.v16i2.1793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study presents the systemisation of lessons learned from the urban sector in which the measures based on the guiding principle of risk-informed development (RID) have been implemented in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) region at the national and/or sub-national levels. Despite notable risks in the region, these are not adequately considered in urban development planning and programming. Aiming at strengthening RID in the SADC region, the objectives of this peer-to-peer exchange were achieved through virtual workshops, roundtables and briefings on a cloud-based and open-source BigBlueButton Web conferencing system. Risk-based decision frameworks were used as footprints throughout the moderation phases. Peer-to-peer exchanges totalled 25 events and 80 registered individual members. About 14 SADC member states and 26 cities represented by city officials, local governments and academia participated in this process. Results along the risk-based decision frameworks lead to a clustering of recurring topics during the peer-to-peer exchange, which are presented along legal and organisational setups; budget and funding; risk assessment and mitigation options; and data and information flows considerations.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>Aligned with the 'Regional Assessment on Urban Vulnerability and Resilience in SADC Member States' by conclusions provide a series of recommendations for risk-informed urban development in the SADC region.</p>","PeriodicalId":51823,"journal":{"name":"Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies","volume":"16 2","pages":"1793"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11621914/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons learned from the risk-informed urban development initiative in the SADC region.\",\"authors\":\"Ketlaodirelang E Letebele, Manuel A A L De Araujo, Johanes A Belle, Frederika A Shigwedha, Lucie N Bakajika, Geofrey Ochieng, Georg Johann, Tlou D Raphela, Jimmy P Yoedsel, Gorata Samuel, Karl H G Sada\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/jamba.v16i2.1793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study presents the systemisation of lessons learned from the urban sector in which the measures based on the guiding principle of risk-informed development (RID) have been implemented in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) region at the national and/or sub-national levels. Despite notable risks in the region, these are not adequately considered in urban development planning and programming. Aiming at strengthening RID in the SADC region, the objectives of this peer-to-peer exchange were achieved through virtual workshops, roundtables and briefings on a cloud-based and open-source BigBlueButton Web conferencing system. Risk-based decision frameworks were used as footprints throughout the moderation phases. Peer-to-peer exchanges totalled 25 events and 80 registered individual members. About 14 SADC member states and 26 cities represented by city officials, local governments and academia participated in this process. Results along the risk-based decision frameworks lead to a clustering of recurring topics during the peer-to-peer exchange, which are presented along legal and organisational setups; budget and funding; risk assessment and mitigation options; and data and information flows considerations.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>Aligned with the 'Regional Assessment on Urban Vulnerability and Resilience in SADC Member States' by conclusions provide a series of recommendations for risk-informed urban development in the SADC region.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"1793\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11621914/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v16i2.1793\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v16i2.1793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究系统地介绍了从城市部门吸取的经验教训,在这些经验教训中,以风险为基础的发展指导原则(RID)为基础的措施已在南部非洲发展共同体(SADC)区域的国家和/或国家以下各级得到实施。尽管该地区存在显著的风险,但在城市发展规划和规划中没有充分考虑到这些风险。为了加强南部非洲发展共同体区域的RID,这一点对点交流的目标是通过基于云的开源BigBlueButton网络会议系统的虚拟讲习班、圆桌会议和简报会议实现的。基于风险的决策框架被用作整个调节阶段的足迹。点对点交流共有25个活动和80个注册个人会员。大约14个南共体成员国和26个城市的市政官员、地方政府和学术界代表参加了这一进程。基于风险的决策框架的结果导致点对点交换期间反复出现的主题聚类,这些主题是在法律和组织设置中呈现的;预算和资金;风险评估和缓解方案;以及数据和信息流的考虑。贡献:与“南部非洲发展共同体成员国城市脆弱性和复原力区域评估”结论一致,为南部非洲发展共同体区域的风险知情城市发展提供了一系列建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lessons learned from the risk-informed urban development initiative in the SADC region.

This study presents the systemisation of lessons learned from the urban sector in which the measures based on the guiding principle of risk-informed development (RID) have been implemented in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) region at the national and/or sub-national levels. Despite notable risks in the region, these are not adequately considered in urban development planning and programming. Aiming at strengthening RID in the SADC region, the objectives of this peer-to-peer exchange were achieved through virtual workshops, roundtables and briefings on a cloud-based and open-source BigBlueButton Web conferencing system. Risk-based decision frameworks were used as footprints throughout the moderation phases. Peer-to-peer exchanges totalled 25 events and 80 registered individual members. About 14 SADC member states and 26 cities represented by city officials, local governments and academia participated in this process. Results along the risk-based decision frameworks lead to a clustering of recurring topics during the peer-to-peer exchange, which are presented along legal and organisational setups; budget and funding; risk assessment and mitigation options; and data and information flows considerations.

Contribution: Aligned with the 'Regional Assessment on Urban Vulnerability and Resilience in SADC Member States' by conclusions provide a series of recommendations for risk-informed urban development in the SADC region.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies
Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信