根管器械回收的预测因素:碎片长度与位置的关系。

Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics Pub Date : 2024-09-09 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.5395/rde.2024.49.e35
Ricardo Portigliatti, Eugenia Pilar Consoli Lizzi, Pablo Alejandro Rodríguez
{"title":"根管器械回收的预测因素:碎片长度与位置的关系。","authors":"Ricardo Portigliatti, Eugenia Pilar Consoli Lizzi, Pablo Alejandro Rodríguez","doi":"10.5395/rde.2024.49.e35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to relate the file fragment length and location in the root canal to the retrieval chances, the clinical time required and the occurrence of secondary fractures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty clinical cases of fractured instruments were included in this study. They were classified according to the instrument length and the location of the root canal. In each group, the success rate in the instrument retrieval, the clinical time required and the occurrence of secondary fractures were evaluated. The collected data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test on the basis of a 0.05 significance level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The fragment length showed no significant influence on the assessed variables (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The root third where the instrument was located resulted in an increased clinical time, with statistically significant differences (<i>p</i> < 0.05). However, the procedure success rate and the occurrence of secondary fractures showed no association with these variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In accordance with the findings of this study, the fractured fragment length did not influence any of the variables assessed, but it is suggested to focus on the fragment location inside the root canal to decide the retrieval of a fractured instrument.</p>","PeriodicalId":21102,"journal":{"name":"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics","volume":"49 4","pages":"e35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11621310/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive factors in the retrieval of endodontic instruments: the relationship between the fragment length and location.\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo Portigliatti, Eugenia Pilar Consoli Lizzi, Pablo Alejandro Rodríguez\",\"doi\":\"10.5395/rde.2024.49.e35\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to relate the file fragment length and location in the root canal to the retrieval chances, the clinical time required and the occurrence of secondary fractures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty clinical cases of fractured instruments were included in this study. They were classified according to the instrument length and the location of the root canal. In each group, the success rate in the instrument retrieval, the clinical time required and the occurrence of secondary fractures were evaluated. The collected data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test on the basis of a 0.05 significance level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The fragment length showed no significant influence on the assessed variables (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The root third where the instrument was located resulted in an increased clinical time, with statistically significant differences (<i>p</i> < 0.05). However, the procedure success rate and the occurrence of secondary fractures showed no association with these variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In accordance with the findings of this study, the fractured fragment length did not influence any of the variables assessed, but it is suggested to focus on the fragment location inside the root canal to decide the retrieval of a fractured instrument.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics\",\"volume\":\"49 4\",\"pages\":\"e35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11621310/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2024.49.e35\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2024.49.e35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨根管中锉片的长度和位置与根管取根机会、临床所需时间和继发骨折的发生之间的关系。材料与方法:选取60例器械骨折的临床病例。根据器械的长度和根管的位置进行分类。评估各组器械取出成功率、所需临床时间及继发性骨折发生情况。收集的数据采用Kruskal-Wallis检验,显著性水平为0.05。结果:片段长度对评估变量无显著影响(p < 0.05)。放置器械的根三分之一导致临床时间增加,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。然而,手术成功率和继发性骨折的发生与这些变量无关。结论:根据本研究的发现,骨折碎片长度对评估的任何变量都没有影响,但建议关注碎片在根管内的位置来决定骨折器械的取出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictive factors in the retrieval of endodontic instruments: the relationship between the fragment length and location.

Objectives: This study aimed to relate the file fragment length and location in the root canal to the retrieval chances, the clinical time required and the occurrence of secondary fractures.

Materials and methods: Sixty clinical cases of fractured instruments were included in this study. They were classified according to the instrument length and the location of the root canal. In each group, the success rate in the instrument retrieval, the clinical time required and the occurrence of secondary fractures were evaluated. The collected data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test on the basis of a 0.05 significance level.

Results: The fragment length showed no significant influence on the assessed variables (p > 0.05). The root third where the instrument was located resulted in an increased clinical time, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). However, the procedure success rate and the occurrence of secondary fractures showed no association with these variables.

Conclusions: In accordance with the findings of this study, the fractured fragment length did not influence any of the variables assessed, but it is suggested to focus on the fragment location inside the root canal to decide the retrieval of a fractured instrument.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信