首次使用NPseal®:一种用于结直肠手术伤口的新型机械负压敷料。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Johnny Wang, Brian Williams, Jordan R Wlodarczyk, Abhinav Gupta, Debora Kim, Kyle G Cologne, Sarah E Koller, Christine Hsieh, Marjun P Duldulao, Joongho Shin
{"title":"首次使用NPseal®:一种用于结直肠手术伤口的新型机械负压敷料。","authors":"Johnny Wang, Brian Williams, Jordan R Wlodarczyk, Abhinav Gupta, Debora Kim, Kyle G Cologne, Sarah E Koller, Christine Hsieh, Marjun P Duldulao, Joongho Shin","doi":"10.1177/15533506241307729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of prophylactic closed-incisional negative pressure wound therapy after colorectal procedures has been shown to reduce postoperative wound complications and surgical site infection. We present our experience with a novel, closed-incision, mechanically powered negative pressure (MP-NPD) dressing after colorectal procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, single-center, single-arm observational study assessing patient reported and wound healing outcomes of colorectal surgical incisions dressed with a MP-NPD. Consecutive patients, 18 years and older, that met inclusion criteria were enrolled between May 2021 and December 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients were included (13 male/17 female) with a mean age of 62.7 ± 11.8 years and mean body mass index of 25.5 ± 4.4 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. The mean incision length covered was 3.0 ± 1.8 cm. The median number of manual pinches required to initially activate the dressing with negative pressure within -75 to -125 mmHg was 12 (range 7-20). Four dressings were changed (13.3%) after drainage was noted inside the pump; not including these, 88.5% (23/26) of dressings held pressure consistently without any re-pinching during the 72-h period since they were first applied in the operating room. 75.9% of patients reported the dressing was \"very comfortable\" and none reported the dressing restricted mobility. 79.3% of patients reported the dressing was \"very easy\" to use. There were no cases of major wound complication or surgical site infection within 30 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of MP-NPD appears to be feasible on primarily-closed colorectal incisions. Further randomized controlled study is warranted to ascertain its clinical efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"15533506241307729"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First Experience with the NPseal®: A Novel Mechanically Powered Negative Pressure Dressing Applied to Colorectal Surgery Wounds.\",\"authors\":\"Johnny Wang, Brian Williams, Jordan R Wlodarczyk, Abhinav Gupta, Debora Kim, Kyle G Cologne, Sarah E Koller, Christine Hsieh, Marjun P Duldulao, Joongho Shin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15533506241307729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of prophylactic closed-incisional negative pressure wound therapy after colorectal procedures has been shown to reduce postoperative wound complications and surgical site infection. We present our experience with a novel, closed-incision, mechanically powered negative pressure (MP-NPD) dressing after colorectal procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, single-center, single-arm observational study assessing patient reported and wound healing outcomes of colorectal surgical incisions dressed with a MP-NPD. Consecutive patients, 18 years and older, that met inclusion criteria were enrolled between May 2021 and December 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients were included (13 male/17 female) with a mean age of 62.7 ± 11.8 years and mean body mass index of 25.5 ± 4.4 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. The mean incision length covered was 3.0 ± 1.8 cm. The median number of manual pinches required to initially activate the dressing with negative pressure within -75 to -125 mmHg was 12 (range 7-20). Four dressings were changed (13.3%) after drainage was noted inside the pump; not including these, 88.5% (23/26) of dressings held pressure consistently without any re-pinching during the 72-h period since they were first applied in the operating room. 75.9% of patients reported the dressing was \\\"very comfortable\\\" and none reported the dressing restricted mobility. 79.3% of patients reported the dressing was \\\"very easy\\\" to use. There were no cases of major wound complication or surgical site infection within 30 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of MP-NPD appears to be feasible on primarily-closed colorectal incisions. Further randomized controlled study is warranted to ascertain its clinical efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Innovation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15533506241307729\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506241307729\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506241307729","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:结肠直肠手术后预防性封闭负压伤口治疗已被证明可以减少术后伤口并发症和手术部位感染。我们介绍了一种新型的、闭合切口、机械负压(MP-NPD)敷料在结直肠手术后的应用经验。方法:这是一项前瞻性、单中心、单臂观察性研究,评估患者报告的结直肠手术切口使用MP-NPD的伤口愈合结果。在2021年5月至2021年12月期间,连续入组符合纳入标准的18岁及以上患者。结果:纳入患者30例(男13例,女17例),平均年龄62.7±11.8岁,平均体重指数25.5±4.4 kg/m2。平均覆盖切口长度为3.0±1.8 cm。在-75至-125 mmHg的负压下,初始激活敷料所需的手动按压次数中位数为12次(范围7-20次)。注意泵内引流后更换敷料4例(13.3%);不包括这些,88.5%(23/26)的敷料在第一次在手术室使用后的72小时内一直保持压力,没有再次夹紧。75.9%的患者报告敷料“非常舒适”,没有人报告敷料限制活动。79.3%的患者表示敷料“非常容易”使用。30天内无重大创面并发症及手术部位感染。结论:MP-NPD在原发性结直肠闭合切口的应用是可行的。临床疗效有待进一步的随机对照研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
First Experience with the NPseal®: A Novel Mechanically Powered Negative Pressure Dressing Applied to Colorectal Surgery Wounds.

Background: The use of prophylactic closed-incisional negative pressure wound therapy after colorectal procedures has been shown to reduce postoperative wound complications and surgical site infection. We present our experience with a novel, closed-incision, mechanically powered negative pressure (MP-NPD) dressing after colorectal procedures.

Methods: This was a prospective, single-center, single-arm observational study assessing patient reported and wound healing outcomes of colorectal surgical incisions dressed with a MP-NPD. Consecutive patients, 18 years and older, that met inclusion criteria were enrolled between May 2021 and December 2021.

Results: Thirty patients were included (13 male/17 female) with a mean age of 62.7 ± 11.8 years and mean body mass index of 25.5 ± 4.4 kg/m2. The mean incision length covered was 3.0 ± 1.8 cm. The median number of manual pinches required to initially activate the dressing with negative pressure within -75 to -125 mmHg was 12 (range 7-20). Four dressings were changed (13.3%) after drainage was noted inside the pump; not including these, 88.5% (23/26) of dressings held pressure consistently without any re-pinching during the 72-h period since they were first applied in the operating room. 75.9% of patients reported the dressing was "very comfortable" and none reported the dressing restricted mobility. 79.3% of patients reported the dressing was "very easy" to use. There were no cases of major wound complication or surgical site infection within 30 days.

Conclusion: The use of MP-NPD appears to be feasible on primarily-closed colorectal incisions. Further randomized controlled study is warranted to ascertain its clinical efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical Innovation
Surgical Innovation 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信