虚拟植入设备评估两种人工晶体设计的能力。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Sebastian Marx, Oliver Kolbe, Mario Gerlach, Steve Schallhorn, Wolfgang Sickenberger
{"title":"虚拟植入设备评估两种人工晶体设计的能力。","authors":"Sebastian Marx, Oliver Kolbe, Mario Gerlach, Steve Schallhorn, Wolfgang Sickenberger","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20240923-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the ability of a novel device using virtual implantation to compare the visual performance of two different types of intraocular lenses (IOLs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, masked, and randomized clinical trial, the visual performance of monofocal and lowadd bifocal IOLs was compared using a device for virtual implantation called VirtIOL. Eighty patients (< 50 years old with healthy eyes and without cataract) were enrolled in this study. Defocus curve and contrast sensitivity were measured using the Freiburg Vision and Contrast Test (FrACT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Expected defocus curves for the monofocal IOL and the bifocal IOL confirm the utility of the method. The monofocal IOL provided a slightly higher mean visual acuity at 0.00 diopter (D) (mean ± standard deviation: -0.18 ± 0.07 D) compared to the bifocal IOL (-0.16 ± 0.08 D), but also a slightly lower visual acuity from -1.25 to -4.00 D. The mean contrast sensitivity was significantly higher for the monofocal IOL at 7, 11, and 15 cycles per degree. The investigators attest a high usability of the method due to simple communication with the test patient and quick and uncomplicated change of test objects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The visual performance of the monofocal and bifocal IOLs was as expected, with greater depth of focus but reduced contrast sensitivity for the bifocal IOL. The VirtIOL device represents a promising tool to predict the visual performance of IOLs before implantation in patients. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2024;40(12):e911-e915.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"40 12","pages":"e911-e915"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ability of a Virtual Implantation Device to Evaluate Two Intraocular Lens Designs.\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Marx, Oliver Kolbe, Mario Gerlach, Steve Schallhorn, Wolfgang Sickenberger\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/1081597X-20240923-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the ability of a novel device using virtual implantation to compare the visual performance of two different types of intraocular lenses (IOLs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, masked, and randomized clinical trial, the visual performance of monofocal and lowadd bifocal IOLs was compared using a device for virtual implantation called VirtIOL. Eighty patients (< 50 years old with healthy eyes and without cataract) were enrolled in this study. Defocus curve and contrast sensitivity were measured using the Freiburg Vision and Contrast Test (FrACT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Expected defocus curves for the monofocal IOL and the bifocal IOL confirm the utility of the method. The monofocal IOL provided a slightly higher mean visual acuity at 0.00 diopter (D) (mean ± standard deviation: -0.18 ± 0.07 D) compared to the bifocal IOL (-0.16 ± 0.08 D), but also a slightly lower visual acuity from -1.25 to -4.00 D. The mean contrast sensitivity was significantly higher for the monofocal IOL at 7, 11, and 15 cycles per degree. The investigators attest a high usability of the method due to simple communication with the test patient and quick and uncomplicated change of test objects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The visual performance of the monofocal and bifocal IOLs was as expected, with greater depth of focus but reduced contrast sensitivity for the bifocal IOL. The VirtIOL device represents a promising tool to predict the visual performance of IOLs before implantation in patients. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2024;40(12):e911-e915.]</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\"40 12\",\"pages\":\"e911-e915\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20240923-01\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20240923-01","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价一种新型虚拟植入术比较两种不同类型人工晶状体(iol)视觉性能的能力。方法:在这项前瞻性、蒙面和随机临床试验中,使用虚拟植入设备VirtIOL比较单焦点和低双焦点iol的视觉性能。80例患者(年龄< 50岁,眼睛健康,无白内障)入选本研究。散焦曲线和对比灵敏度采用弗莱堡视觉和对比度测试(FrACT)测量。结果:单焦点人工晶体和双焦点人工晶体的预期离焦曲线证实了该方法的实用性。与双焦点IOL(-0.16±0.08 D)相比,单焦点IOL在0.00屈光度(D)时的平均视力略高(平均±标准差:-0.18±0.07 D),但在-1.25至-4.00 D之间的平均视力也略低。单焦点IOL在7、11和15周期/度时的平均对比灵敏度显著高于双焦点IOL。研究人员证明,由于与测试患者的沟通简单,以及测试对象的快速和简单的更改,该方法具有很高的可用性。结论:单焦点和双焦点人工晶状体的视觉性能符合预期,双焦点人工晶状体的聚焦深度更大,但对比敏感度降低。VirtIOL装置是一种很有前途的工具,可以在患者植入人工晶体前预测其视力表现。[J].中华眼科杂志,2014;35(6):559 - 559。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Ability of a Virtual Implantation Device to Evaluate Two Intraocular Lens Designs.

Purpose: To evaluate the ability of a novel device using virtual implantation to compare the visual performance of two different types of intraocular lenses (IOLs).

Methods: In this prospective, masked, and randomized clinical trial, the visual performance of monofocal and lowadd bifocal IOLs was compared using a device for virtual implantation called VirtIOL. Eighty patients (< 50 years old with healthy eyes and without cataract) were enrolled in this study. Defocus curve and contrast sensitivity were measured using the Freiburg Vision and Contrast Test (FrACT).

Results: Expected defocus curves for the monofocal IOL and the bifocal IOL confirm the utility of the method. The monofocal IOL provided a slightly higher mean visual acuity at 0.00 diopter (D) (mean ± standard deviation: -0.18 ± 0.07 D) compared to the bifocal IOL (-0.16 ± 0.08 D), but also a slightly lower visual acuity from -1.25 to -4.00 D. The mean contrast sensitivity was significantly higher for the monofocal IOL at 7, 11, and 15 cycles per degree. The investigators attest a high usability of the method due to simple communication with the test patient and quick and uncomplicated change of test objects.

Conclusions: The visual performance of the monofocal and bifocal IOLs was as expected, with greater depth of focus but reduced contrast sensitivity for the bifocal IOL. The VirtIOL device represents a promising tool to predict the visual performance of IOLs before implantation in patients. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(12):e911-e915.].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信