临床标准与定量聚合酶链反应诊断奥克兰儿童疥疮的一致性。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Tarun Nambiar, Sanskruti Zaveri, Simon Thornley, Vanessa Selak, Gerhard Sundborn, Cielo Pasay, Arthur J Morris
{"title":"临床标准与定量聚合酶链反应诊断奥克兰儿童疥疮的一致性。","authors":"Tarun Nambiar,&nbsp;Sanskruti Zaveri,&nbsp;Simon Thornley,&nbsp;Vanessa Selak,&nbsp;Gerhard Sundborn,&nbsp;Cielo Pasay,&nbsp;Arthur J Morris","doi":"10.1111/jpc.16738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>We sought to determine the degree of agreement between clinical and laboratory methods for diagnosing scabies in school-aged children.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Clinical information and samples were collected from children aged 7 months to 14 years attending educational institutions in Auckland, New Zealand. Two methods determined scabies status: the International Alliance for the Control of Scabies clinical criteria (IACS) and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Sensitivity and specificity of each method, as the reference or index standard, were estimated and agreement was determined using Cohen's kappa statistic.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Sixteen of 145 children were positive based on IACS criteria and 15 of 64 with a suspicious skin lesion returned a positive qPCR test. IACS sensitivity and specificity were 66.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 39.9–93.3) and 94% (95% CI: 89.9–98.0), respectively (with qPCR as the reference). For qPCR, sensitivity and specificity were 50% (95% CI: 25.5–74.5) and 96.9% (95% CI: 94.0–100.0), respectively (with IACS as the reference). The kappa value was 0.53.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Agreement between clinical and laboratory methods in the identification of scabies diagnosis was moderate. Both methods had low sensitivity but high specificity. Scabies diagnosis might be improved, thereby enhancing control measures, by relaxing the IACS criteria (as some IACS-negative participants returned positive qPCR tests, indicating mite DNA was present) and conversely supplementing clinical assessment with qPCR testing.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16648,"journal":{"name":"Journal of paediatrics and child health","volume":"61 2","pages":"216-222"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agreement between clinical criteria and quantitative polymerase chain reaction for diagnosing scabies in Auckland children\",\"authors\":\"Tarun Nambiar,&nbsp;Sanskruti Zaveri,&nbsp;Simon Thornley,&nbsp;Vanessa Selak,&nbsp;Gerhard Sundborn,&nbsp;Cielo Pasay,&nbsp;Arthur J Morris\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jpc.16738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>We sought to determine the degree of agreement between clinical and laboratory methods for diagnosing scabies in school-aged children.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Clinical information and samples were collected from children aged 7 months to 14 years attending educational institutions in Auckland, New Zealand. Two methods determined scabies status: the International Alliance for the Control of Scabies clinical criteria (IACS) and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Sensitivity and specificity of each method, as the reference or index standard, were estimated and agreement was determined using Cohen's kappa statistic.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Sixteen of 145 children were positive based on IACS criteria and 15 of 64 with a suspicious skin lesion returned a positive qPCR test. IACS sensitivity and specificity were 66.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 39.9–93.3) and 94% (95% CI: 89.9–98.0), respectively (with qPCR as the reference). For qPCR, sensitivity and specificity were 50% (95% CI: 25.5–74.5) and 96.9% (95% CI: 94.0–100.0), respectively (with IACS as the reference). The kappa value was 0.53.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Agreement between clinical and laboratory methods in the identification of scabies diagnosis was moderate. Both methods had low sensitivity but high specificity. Scabies diagnosis might be improved, thereby enhancing control measures, by relaxing the IACS criteria (as some IACS-negative participants returned positive qPCR tests, indicating mite DNA was present) and conversely supplementing clinical assessment with qPCR testing.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of paediatrics and child health\",\"volume\":\"61 2\",\"pages\":\"216-222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of paediatrics and child health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpc.16738\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of paediatrics and child health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpc.16738","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们试图确定诊断学龄儿童疥疮的临床和实验室方法之间的一致性程度。方法:收集新西兰奥克兰市教育机构7个月~ 14岁儿童的临床资料和样本。确定疥疮状态的方法有两种:国际控制疥疮联盟临床标准(IACS)和定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)。以Cohen’s kappa统计量估计各方法作为参考或指标标准的敏感性和特异性,并确定一致性。结果:145名儿童中有16名根据IACS标准呈阳性,64名可疑皮肤病变中有15名qPCR检测呈阳性。IACS的敏感性和特异性分别为66.7%(95%可信区间(CI): 39.9 ~ 93.3)和94% (95% CI: 89.9 ~ 98.0)(以qPCR为参照)。qPCR的灵敏度和特异性分别为50% (95% CI: 25.5-74.5)和96.9% (95% CI: 94.0-100.0)(以IACS为参考)。kappa值为0.53。结论:临床方法与实验室方法在疥疮诊断鉴定中的一致性较好。两种方法灵敏度低,特异度高。通过放宽IACS标准(因为一些IACS阴性的参与者qPCR检测呈阳性,表明存在螨虫DNA),以及反过来用qPCR检测补充临床评估,可能会改善疥疮的诊断,从而加强控制措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Agreement between clinical criteria and quantitative polymerase chain reaction for diagnosing scabies in Auckland children

Aim

We sought to determine the degree of agreement between clinical and laboratory methods for diagnosing scabies in school-aged children.

Methods

Clinical information and samples were collected from children aged 7 months to 14 years attending educational institutions in Auckland, New Zealand. Two methods determined scabies status: the International Alliance for the Control of Scabies clinical criteria (IACS) and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Sensitivity and specificity of each method, as the reference or index standard, were estimated and agreement was determined using Cohen's kappa statistic.

Results

Sixteen of 145 children were positive based on IACS criteria and 15 of 64 with a suspicious skin lesion returned a positive qPCR test. IACS sensitivity and specificity were 66.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 39.9–93.3) and 94% (95% CI: 89.9–98.0), respectively (with qPCR as the reference). For qPCR, sensitivity and specificity were 50% (95% CI: 25.5–74.5) and 96.9% (95% CI: 94.0–100.0), respectively (with IACS as the reference). The kappa value was 0.53.

Conclusion

Agreement between clinical and laboratory methods in the identification of scabies diagnosis was moderate. Both methods had low sensitivity but high specificity. Scabies diagnosis might be improved, thereby enhancing control measures, by relaxing the IACS criteria (as some IACS-negative participants returned positive qPCR tests, indicating mite DNA was present) and conversely supplementing clinical assessment with qPCR testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
487
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health publishes original research articles of scientific excellence in paediatrics and child health. Research Articles, Case Reports and Letters to the Editor are published, together with invited Reviews, Annotations, Editorial Comments and manuscripts of educational interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信