两种内联光化学系统的比较:一项配对交叉试验。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Transfusion Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-08 DOI:10.1111/trf.18090
Nicola Piccirillo, Rossana Putzulu, Federica Fatone, Giuseppina Massini, Sabrina Giammarco, Elisabetta Metafuni, Maria Assunta Limongiello, Patrizia Chiusolo, Simona Sica, Luciana Teofili
{"title":"两种内联光化学系统的比较:一项配对交叉试验。","authors":"Nicola Piccirillo, Rossana Putzulu, Federica Fatone, Giuseppina Massini, Sabrina Giammarco, Elisabetta Metafuni, Maria Assunta Limongiello, Patrizia Chiusolo, Simona Sica, Luciana Teofili","doi":"10.1111/trf.18090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been demonstrated as an effective treatment for graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). The inline system was developed by Therakos in 1987. Recently, Fresenius Kabi implemented an integration of cell separator Amicus and a UVA photoactivation device (Phelix), realizing an inline photopheresis system.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>In 2022 we designed a prospective paired crossover trial (NCT05718674) comparing two integrated ECP protocols: Therakos CELLEX and Amicus ECP system. Twenty patients affected by corticosteroid resistant GvHD were submitted to 80 ECP, 40 paired procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All procedures were well tolerated, with no significant differences in procedure duration. CELLEX cell product showed higher granulocytes and platelet content, while Amicus cell product exhibited higher enrichment of lymphocytes, resulting in significantly higher MNC purity (92.9% vs. 84%). A significantly higher granulocytes and platelets absolute content was observed in CELLEX cell products, while Amicus cell products showed a significantly higher number of TNCs and MNCs. Differences in granulocyte and platelet content remained significant even after normalization of the data according to blood volume processed. These findings are confirmed by a statistically significant higher CE2% for CELLEX for granulocytes and platelets along with the lack of significant difference observed for TNCs and MNCs.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our analysis shows differences in the characteristics of the procedure and the cell product. Anyway, both devices are effective for performing ECP procedure, as they collect a cell product suitable for photopheresis. At present, our results represent the first data set comparing two available inline ECP devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":"159-169"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of two inline photopheresis systems: A paired crossover trial.\",\"authors\":\"Nicola Piccirillo, Rossana Putzulu, Federica Fatone, Giuseppina Massini, Sabrina Giammarco, Elisabetta Metafuni, Maria Assunta Limongiello, Patrizia Chiusolo, Simona Sica, Luciana Teofili\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/trf.18090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been demonstrated as an effective treatment for graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). The inline system was developed by Therakos in 1987. Recently, Fresenius Kabi implemented an integration of cell separator Amicus and a UVA photoactivation device (Phelix), realizing an inline photopheresis system.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>In 2022 we designed a prospective paired crossover trial (NCT05718674) comparing two integrated ECP protocols: Therakos CELLEX and Amicus ECP system. Twenty patients affected by corticosteroid resistant GvHD were submitted to 80 ECP, 40 paired procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All procedures were well tolerated, with no significant differences in procedure duration. CELLEX cell product showed higher granulocytes and platelet content, while Amicus cell product exhibited higher enrichment of lymphocytes, resulting in significantly higher MNC purity (92.9% vs. 84%). A significantly higher granulocytes and platelets absolute content was observed in CELLEX cell products, while Amicus cell products showed a significantly higher number of TNCs and MNCs. Differences in granulocyte and platelet content remained significant even after normalization of the data according to blood volume processed. These findings are confirmed by a statistically significant higher CE2% for CELLEX for granulocytes and platelets along with the lack of significant difference observed for TNCs and MNCs.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our analysis shows differences in the characteristics of the procedure and the cell product. Anyway, both devices are effective for performing ECP procedure, as they collect a cell product suitable for photopheresis. At present, our results represent the first data set comparing two available inline ECP devices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"159-169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18090\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18090","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:体外光合作用(ECP)已被证明是治疗移植物抗宿主病(GvHD)的有效方法。内联系统是由Therakos在1987年开发的。最近,费森尤斯·卡比公司将细胞分离器Amicus与UVA光活化装置philix集成在一起,实现了内联光活化系统。研究设计和方法:2022年,我们设计了一项前瞻性配对交叉试验(NCT05718674),比较两种综合ECP方案:Therakos CELLEX和Amicus ECP系统。20例皮质类固醇抵抗性GvHD患者接受80例ECP, 40例配对手术。结果:所有手术均耐受良好,手术时间无显著差异。CELLEX细胞产品具有较高的粒细胞和血小板含量,而Amicus细胞产品具有较高的淋巴细胞富集,从而显著提高MNC纯度(92.9% vs. 84%)。CELLEX细胞产品的粒细胞和血小板绝对含量明显较高,而Amicus细胞产品的TNCs和MNCs数量明显较高。即使根据处理过的血容量对数据进行归一化处理后,粒细胞和血小板含量的差异仍然显著。这些发现被CELLEX的粒细胞和血小板CE2%的统计学显著提高所证实,同时在跨国公司和跨国公司中没有观察到显著差异。讨论:我们的分析显示了程序和细胞产物特性的差异。无论如何,这两种设备都是有效的执行ECP程序,因为它们收集适合光化学的细胞产物。目前,我们的结果代表了比较两种可用的内联ECP设备的第一个数据集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of two inline photopheresis systems: A paired crossover trial.

Background: Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been demonstrated as an effective treatment for graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). The inline system was developed by Therakos in 1987. Recently, Fresenius Kabi implemented an integration of cell separator Amicus and a UVA photoactivation device (Phelix), realizing an inline photopheresis system.

Study design and methods: In 2022 we designed a prospective paired crossover trial (NCT05718674) comparing two integrated ECP protocols: Therakos CELLEX and Amicus ECP system. Twenty patients affected by corticosteroid resistant GvHD were submitted to 80 ECP, 40 paired procedures.

Results: All procedures were well tolerated, with no significant differences in procedure duration. CELLEX cell product showed higher granulocytes and platelet content, while Amicus cell product exhibited higher enrichment of lymphocytes, resulting in significantly higher MNC purity (92.9% vs. 84%). A significantly higher granulocytes and platelets absolute content was observed in CELLEX cell products, while Amicus cell products showed a significantly higher number of TNCs and MNCs. Differences in granulocyte and platelet content remained significant even after normalization of the data according to blood volume processed. These findings are confirmed by a statistically significant higher CE2% for CELLEX for granulocytes and platelets along with the lack of significant difference observed for TNCs and MNCs.

Discussion: Our analysis shows differences in the characteristics of the procedure and the cell product. Anyway, both devices are effective for performing ECP procedure, as they collect a cell product suitable for photopheresis. At present, our results represent the first data set comparing two available inline ECP devices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信