以教育为基础的干预调查社区验光师评估角膜缘前房深度的准确性。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Eye Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1038/s41433-024-03492-5
Anish Jindal, Tess Agnew, Dilani Siriwardena, Eleni Nikita, Winifred Nolan
{"title":"以教育为基础的干预调查社区验光师评估角膜缘前房深度的准确性。","authors":"Anish Jindal, Tess Agnew, Dilani Siriwardena, Eleni Nikita, Winifred Nolan","doi":"10.1038/s41433-024-03492-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the UK, referrals for suspected primary angle closure (PAC) by community-based optometrists (CBO) to the hospital eye service show moderate accuracy. This study aimed to assess the interobserver agreement of limbal anterior chamber depth (LACD) between CBOs and ophthalmologists and evaluate the impact of an education intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a 7-point LACD grading scale, consultant ophthalmologists graded an LACD image dataset developed from 100 patients attending Moorfields Eye Hospital. Two sets of 84 images were utilised for two LACD online assessments. CBO were recruited and undertook assessments before and after a PAC education package (EP) between August 2023 and January 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two optometrists completed the initial LACD assessment with a median of 19.0 (IQR 9.3-24.8) years post-registration experience. Using the 7-point LACD grading scale, mean weighted kappa (Kw) for pre-EP was moderate, 0.42 (95% CI, 0.36-0.48), increasing to 0.47 (0.42-0.53) post-EP. Conversion to the 4-point grading scale, Kw was substantial, pre-EP 0.61, (0.56-0.66) and post-EP Kw 0.64 (0.58-0.69). An LACD threshold (<25%) sensitivity and specificity pre-EP was 86.0% (79.9-91.3%) and 84.6 (82.3-86.9), respectively. Post-EP sensitivity decreased to 78.2% (74.1-85.1%) (p = 0.049) but specificity increased to 90.4 (88.1-92.8) (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 4-point LACD grading scale would be more applicable for a case-finding setting. An accessible EP improved agreement and specificity using the joint Royal College of Ophthalmologists/College of Optometrists PAC referral threshold. This EP may reduce false positive PAC referrals and could be rapidly disseminated to CBO. Further research is needed to assess real-world PAC referrals after an education intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":12125,"journal":{"name":"Eye","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An education-based intervention investigating the accuracy of community-based optometrists evaluating limbal anterior chamber depth.\",\"authors\":\"Anish Jindal, Tess Agnew, Dilani Siriwardena, Eleni Nikita, Winifred Nolan\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41433-024-03492-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the UK, referrals for suspected primary angle closure (PAC) by community-based optometrists (CBO) to the hospital eye service show moderate accuracy. This study aimed to assess the interobserver agreement of limbal anterior chamber depth (LACD) between CBOs and ophthalmologists and evaluate the impact of an education intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a 7-point LACD grading scale, consultant ophthalmologists graded an LACD image dataset developed from 100 patients attending Moorfields Eye Hospital. Two sets of 84 images were utilised for two LACD online assessments. CBO were recruited and undertook assessments before and after a PAC education package (EP) between August 2023 and January 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two optometrists completed the initial LACD assessment with a median of 19.0 (IQR 9.3-24.8) years post-registration experience. Using the 7-point LACD grading scale, mean weighted kappa (Kw) for pre-EP was moderate, 0.42 (95% CI, 0.36-0.48), increasing to 0.47 (0.42-0.53) post-EP. Conversion to the 4-point grading scale, Kw was substantial, pre-EP 0.61, (0.56-0.66) and post-EP Kw 0.64 (0.58-0.69). An LACD threshold (<25%) sensitivity and specificity pre-EP was 86.0% (79.9-91.3%) and 84.6 (82.3-86.9), respectively. Post-EP sensitivity decreased to 78.2% (74.1-85.1%) (p = 0.049) but specificity increased to 90.4 (88.1-92.8) (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 4-point LACD grading scale would be more applicable for a case-finding setting. An accessible EP improved agreement and specificity using the joint Royal College of Ophthalmologists/College of Optometrists PAC referral threshold. This EP may reduce false positive PAC referrals and could be rapidly disseminated to CBO. Further research is needed to assess real-world PAC referrals after an education intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eye\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eye\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-03492-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-03492-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:在英国,社区验光师(CBO)向医院眼科服务转诊的疑似初级闭角(PAC)显示出中等的准确性。本研究旨在评估cbo和眼科医生对角膜缘前房深度(LACD)的观察者之间的一致性,并评估教育干预的影响。方法:使用7分制的LACD分级量表,眼科顾问医师对来自Moorfields眼科医院的100名患者的LACD图像数据集进行评分。两组共84张图像用于两次LACD在线评估。在2023年8月至2024年1月期间,CBO被招募并在PAC教育一揽子计划(EP)前后进行评估。结果:52名验光师完成了初始LACD评估,注册后经验中位数为19.0 (IQR 9.3-24.8)年。使用7点LACD分级量表,ep前的平均加权kappa (Kw)为中等,为0.42 (95% CI, 0.36-0.48), ep后增加到0.47(0.42-0.53)。转换为4点分级量表,Kw相当可观,ep前为0.61,(0.56-0.66),ep后为0.64(0.58-0.69)。结论:4点LACD分级量表将更适用于病例发现设置。使用皇家眼科学院/验光学院PAC转诊阈值,可获得的EP提高了一致性和特异性。该EP可减少假阳性PAC转诊,并可迅速传播给CBO。需要进一步的研究来评估现实世界的PAC转诊后的教育干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An education-based intervention investigating the accuracy of community-based optometrists evaluating limbal anterior chamber depth.

Introduction: In the UK, referrals for suspected primary angle closure (PAC) by community-based optometrists (CBO) to the hospital eye service show moderate accuracy. This study aimed to assess the interobserver agreement of limbal anterior chamber depth (LACD) between CBOs and ophthalmologists and evaluate the impact of an education intervention.

Methods: Using a 7-point LACD grading scale, consultant ophthalmologists graded an LACD image dataset developed from 100 patients attending Moorfields Eye Hospital. Two sets of 84 images were utilised for two LACD online assessments. CBO were recruited and undertook assessments before and after a PAC education package (EP) between August 2023 and January 2024.

Results: Fifty-two optometrists completed the initial LACD assessment with a median of 19.0 (IQR 9.3-24.8) years post-registration experience. Using the 7-point LACD grading scale, mean weighted kappa (Kw) for pre-EP was moderate, 0.42 (95% CI, 0.36-0.48), increasing to 0.47 (0.42-0.53) post-EP. Conversion to the 4-point grading scale, Kw was substantial, pre-EP 0.61, (0.56-0.66) and post-EP Kw 0.64 (0.58-0.69). An LACD threshold (<25%) sensitivity and specificity pre-EP was 86.0% (79.9-91.3%) and 84.6 (82.3-86.9), respectively. Post-EP sensitivity decreased to 78.2% (74.1-85.1%) (p = 0.049) but specificity increased to 90.4 (88.1-92.8) (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The 4-point LACD grading scale would be more applicable for a case-finding setting. An accessible EP improved agreement and specificity using the joint Royal College of Ophthalmologists/College of Optometrists PAC referral threshold. This EP may reduce false positive PAC referrals and could be rapidly disseminated to CBO. Further research is needed to assess real-world PAC referrals after an education intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Eye
Eye 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
481
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Eye seeks to provide the international practising ophthalmologist with high quality articles, of academic rigour, on the latest global clinical and laboratory based research. Its core aim is to advance the science and practice of ophthalmology with the latest clinical- and scientific-based research. Whilst principally aimed at the practising clinician, the journal contains material of interest to a wider readership including optometrists, orthoptists, other health care professionals and research workers in all aspects of the field of visual science worldwide. Eye is the official journal of The Royal College of Ophthalmologists. Eye encourages the submission of original articles covering all aspects of ophthalmology including: external eye disease; oculo-plastic surgery; orbital and lacrimal disease; ocular surface and corneal disorders; paediatric ophthalmology and strabismus; glaucoma; medical and surgical retina; neuro-ophthalmology; cataract and refractive surgery; ocular oncology; ophthalmic pathology; ophthalmic genetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信