巴基斯坦妇女赋权和目前避孕药具的使用:以性别和权力理论为依据。

IF 2.3 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Frontiers in global women's health Pub Date : 2024-11-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2024.1360052
Bhavita Kumari, Mai Do, Aubrey Spriggs Madkour, Janna Marie Wisniewski
{"title":"巴基斯坦妇女赋权和目前避孕药具的使用:以性别和权力理论为依据。","authors":"Bhavita Kumari, Mai Do, Aubrey Spriggs Madkour, Janna Marie Wisniewski","doi":"10.3389/fgwh.2024.1360052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>It is evident from the stagnant modern contraceptive rate and the growing population of Pakistan that the family planning (FP) programs in Pakistan have failed to deliver successfully. The study examines the association of domains of women's empowerment, following the Theory of Gender and Power, with the current use of contraceptive methods and how intimate partner violence (IPV) can moderate such associations in Pakistan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Married women of reproductive age from the Pakistan DHS (2017-18) were included in the analysis (<i>n</i> = 14,502). Key independent variables were identified using Connell's Theory of Gender and Power operationalized by Wingood and DiClemente, and constructs were created using principal component analysis. Multinomial logistic regressions were conducted to assess the relationships of the three empowerment divisions (i.e., sexual division of labor, sexual division of power, and cathexis), to the current use of contraceptives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When all empowerment domains were included in the model along with covariates, education (sexual division of labor), sex negotiations (sexual division of power), and husband's fertility intentions (cathexis) remained significant in their associations with modern contraceptive use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study in Pakistan to examine multi-faceted empowerment, applying Connell's theory of gender and power to identify key domains associated with contraceptive use. A multi-prong approach to FP programs that aims to improve specific domains of women's empowerment and to increase FP service use may be more likely to succeed than stand-alone programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":73087,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in global women's health","volume":"5 ","pages":"1360052"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11617574/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Women's empowerment and current contraceptive use in Pakistan: informed by theory of gender and power.\",\"authors\":\"Bhavita Kumari, Mai Do, Aubrey Spriggs Madkour, Janna Marie Wisniewski\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fgwh.2024.1360052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>It is evident from the stagnant modern contraceptive rate and the growing population of Pakistan that the family planning (FP) programs in Pakistan have failed to deliver successfully. The study examines the association of domains of women's empowerment, following the Theory of Gender and Power, with the current use of contraceptive methods and how intimate partner violence (IPV) can moderate such associations in Pakistan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Married women of reproductive age from the Pakistan DHS (2017-18) were included in the analysis (<i>n</i> = 14,502). Key independent variables were identified using Connell's Theory of Gender and Power operationalized by Wingood and DiClemente, and constructs were created using principal component analysis. Multinomial logistic regressions were conducted to assess the relationships of the three empowerment divisions (i.e., sexual division of labor, sexual division of power, and cathexis), to the current use of contraceptives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When all empowerment domains were included in the model along with covariates, education (sexual division of labor), sex negotiations (sexual division of power), and husband's fertility intentions (cathexis) remained significant in their associations with modern contraceptive use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study in Pakistan to examine multi-faceted empowerment, applying Connell's theory of gender and power to identify key domains associated with contraceptive use. A multi-prong approach to FP programs that aims to improve specific domains of women's empowerment and to increase FP service use may be more likely to succeed than stand-alone programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in global women's health\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"1360052\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11617574/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in global women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2024.1360052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in global women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2024.1360052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:从巴基斯坦停滞不前的现代避孕率和不断增长的人口可以明显看出,巴基斯坦的计划生育(FP)项目未能成功实施。根据性别与权力理论,该研究考察了妇女赋权领域与目前使用避孕方法的关系,以及亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)如何在巴基斯坦缓和这种关系。方法:将2017-18年巴基斯坦DHS已婚育龄妇女纳入分析(n = 14,502)。使用康奈尔的性别与权力理论(由Wingood和DiClemente操作)确定关键的自变量,并使用主成分分析创建结构。采用多项逻辑回归来评估三个授权部门(即性别分工、性别权力分工和导管)与当前避孕药具使用的关系。结果:当所有授权领域与协变量一起包括在模型中时,教育(性别分工),性谈判(性别权力分工)和丈夫的生育意图(导管)仍然与现代避孕药具的使用有显著的关联。结论:这是巴基斯坦第一个研究多方面赋权的研究,应用康奈尔的性别和权力理论来确定与避孕措施使用相关的关键领域。计划生育项目采取多管齐下的方法,旨在改善妇女赋权的特定领域,增加计划生育服务的使用,可能比单独的项目更有可能取得成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Women's empowerment and current contraceptive use in Pakistan: informed by theory of gender and power.

Introduction: It is evident from the stagnant modern contraceptive rate and the growing population of Pakistan that the family planning (FP) programs in Pakistan have failed to deliver successfully. The study examines the association of domains of women's empowerment, following the Theory of Gender and Power, with the current use of contraceptive methods and how intimate partner violence (IPV) can moderate such associations in Pakistan.

Methods: Married women of reproductive age from the Pakistan DHS (2017-18) were included in the analysis (n = 14,502). Key independent variables were identified using Connell's Theory of Gender and Power operationalized by Wingood and DiClemente, and constructs were created using principal component analysis. Multinomial logistic regressions were conducted to assess the relationships of the three empowerment divisions (i.e., sexual division of labor, sexual division of power, and cathexis), to the current use of contraceptives.

Results: When all empowerment domains were included in the model along with covariates, education (sexual division of labor), sex negotiations (sexual division of power), and husband's fertility intentions (cathexis) remained significant in their associations with modern contraceptive use.

Conclusion: This is the first study in Pakistan to examine multi-faceted empowerment, applying Connell's theory of gender and power to identify key domains associated with contraceptive use. A multi-prong approach to FP programs that aims to improve specific domains of women's empowerment and to increase FP service use may be more likely to succeed than stand-alone programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信