胸腔镜手术后不同阻滞镇痛的利弊。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Current Opinion in Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1097/ACO.0000000000001451
M Ahmet Karakaya, Davud Yapici, Emre Sertac Bingül, Özlem Turhan, Mert Şentürk
{"title":"胸腔镜手术后不同阻滞镇痛的利弊。","authors":"M Ahmet Karakaya, Davud Yapici, Emre Sertac Bingül, Özlem Turhan, Mert Şentürk","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Although there are a lot of studies examining the effects of different blocks for postoperative analgesia after video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), the results are controversial.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Paravertebral block, serratus anterior plane block and erector spinae plane block appear to be effective and beneficial for post-VATS analgesia, but probably in different manners.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>All three blocks can be suggested for daily practice, the choice should be based on personal experience and preference of the anesthetist. Better studies are required for objective decision.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"65-70"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pro's and con's of different blocks for postoperative analgesia after video-assisted thoracic surgery.\",\"authors\":\"M Ahmet Karakaya, Davud Yapici, Emre Sertac Bingül, Özlem Turhan, Mert Şentürk\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001451\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Although there are a lot of studies examining the effects of different blocks for postoperative analgesia after video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), the results are controversial.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Paravertebral block, serratus anterior plane block and erector spinae plane block appear to be effective and beneficial for post-VATS analgesia, but probably in different manners.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>All three blocks can be suggested for daily practice, the choice should be based on personal experience and preference of the anesthetist. Better studies are required for objective decision.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"65-70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001451\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001451","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:虽然有很多研究探讨了不同阻滞对胸外科手术(VATS)术后镇痛的影响,但结果存在争议。最近的研究发现:椎旁阻滞、前锯肌阻滞和竖脊肌阻滞似乎对vats后镇痛是有效和有益的,但可能方式不同。总结:在日常练习中,这三个块都可以推荐使用,选择应根据麻醉医师的个人经验和喜好。客观决策需要更好的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pro's and con's of different blocks for postoperative analgesia after video-assisted thoracic surgery.

Purpose of review: Although there are a lot of studies examining the effects of different blocks for postoperative analgesia after video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), the results are controversial.

Recent findings: Paravertebral block, serratus anterior plane block and erector spinae plane block appear to be effective and beneficial for post-VATS analgesia, but probably in different manners.

Summary: All three blocks can be suggested for daily practice, the choice should be based on personal experience and preference of the anesthetist. Better studies are required for objective decision.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
207
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Published bimonthly and offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field, each issue of Current Opinion in Anesthesiology features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With fifteen disciplines published across the year – including cardiovascular anesthesiology, neuroanesthesia and pain medicine – every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信