保留胃十二指肠动脉的两种不同类型动脉胆道吻合术的比较:回顾性研究。

Transplantation proceedings Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.10.040
Yafei Guo, Zebin Zhu, Wei Wu, Hao Zheng, Xiaodong Yuan, Can Qi, Zhijun Xu, Xuefeng Li, Ning Wang, Jiwei Qin, Ruipeng Song, Jizhou Wang, Dalong Yin, Lianxin Liu, Shugeng Zhang, Björn Nashan
{"title":"保留胃十二指肠动脉的两种不同类型动脉胆道吻合术的比较:回顾性研究。","authors":"Yafei Guo, Zebin Zhu, Wei Wu, Hao Zheng, Xiaodong Yuan, Can Qi, Zhijun Xu, Xuefeng Li, Ning Wang, Jiwei Qin, Ruipeng Song, Jizhou Wang, Dalong Yin, Lianxin Liu, Shugeng Zhang, Björn Nashan","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.10.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Here we investigated 2 different arterial reconstruction procedures with preservation of the gastroduodenal artery (GDA) in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 40 pairs of donors and recipients who underwent OLT from May 2018 to August 2023 were analyzed. The GDA of all recipients was preserved during the hepatic arteries reconstruction, which were divided into 2 groups according to different anastomosis locations, namely the end-to-side group (E-S group, n = 17, Branch-patch between the common hepatic and the gastroduodenal artery) and end-to-end group (E-E group, n = 23, between common hepatic and proper hepatic).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Demographics did not differ between both groups (P > .05). The warm ischemia time (WIT) was numerically longer in the E-S group (403.3 ± 103.3 vs 195.2 ± 35.8 s; P < .001), but the cold ischemia time (CIT) was numerically shorter in the E-S group (279.2 ± 74.7 vs 325.2 ± 15.1 min; P = .023). The time of artery reconstruction and duration of surgery was numerically shorter in the E-S group (21.0 ± 3.6 vs 51.0 ± 9.1 min, P < .001; 326.0 ± 103.4 vs 422.7 ± 24.6 min, P = .001). The E-S group had a lower resistance index (RI) (0.5 ± 0.3 vs 0.6 ± 0.1; P = .049).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both groups showed no differences in artery and biliary complications. GDA preservation meets the anatomical and physiological requirements. E-S is superior to E-E by the time of hepatic artery reconstruction and RI.</p>","PeriodicalId":94258,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":" ","pages":"2183-2190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of 2 Different Types of Arterial and Biliary Anastomoses While Preserving the Gastroduodenal Artery: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yafei Guo, Zebin Zhu, Wei Wu, Hao Zheng, Xiaodong Yuan, Can Qi, Zhijun Xu, Xuefeng Li, Ning Wang, Jiwei Qin, Ruipeng Song, Jizhou Wang, Dalong Yin, Lianxin Liu, Shugeng Zhang, Björn Nashan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.10.040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Here we investigated 2 different arterial reconstruction procedures with preservation of the gastroduodenal artery (GDA) in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 40 pairs of donors and recipients who underwent OLT from May 2018 to August 2023 were analyzed. The GDA of all recipients was preserved during the hepatic arteries reconstruction, which were divided into 2 groups according to different anastomosis locations, namely the end-to-side group (E-S group, n = 17, Branch-patch between the common hepatic and the gastroduodenal artery) and end-to-end group (E-E group, n = 23, between common hepatic and proper hepatic).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Demographics did not differ between both groups (P > .05). The warm ischemia time (WIT) was numerically longer in the E-S group (403.3 ± 103.3 vs 195.2 ± 35.8 s; P < .001), but the cold ischemia time (CIT) was numerically shorter in the E-S group (279.2 ± 74.7 vs 325.2 ± 15.1 min; P = .023). The time of artery reconstruction and duration of surgery was numerically shorter in the E-S group (21.0 ± 3.6 vs 51.0 ± 9.1 min, P < .001; 326.0 ± 103.4 vs 422.7 ± 24.6 min, P = .001). The E-S group had a lower resistance index (RI) (0.5 ± 0.3 vs 0.6 ± 0.1; P = .049).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both groups showed no differences in artery and biliary complications. GDA preservation meets the anatomical and physiological requirements. E-S is superior to E-E by the time of hepatic artery reconstruction and RI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2183-2190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.10.040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.10.040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨原位肝移植(OLT)中保留胃十二指肠动脉(GDA)的两种不同的动脉重建方法。方法:采用回顾性队列研究。分析2018年5月至2023年8月40对肾移植供体和受体的临床病理资料。所有受术者在肝动脉重建过程中均保留GDA,根据吻合位置的不同分为2组,端侧组(E-S组,n = 17,肝总动脉与胃十二指肠动脉之间的分支贴片)和端端组(E-E组,n = 23,肝总动脉与肝原动脉之间的分支贴片)。结果:两组人口统计学差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。E-S组大鼠热缺血时间(WIT)数值上更长(403.3±103.3 vs 195.2±35.8 s);P < 0.001),但E-S组的冷缺血时间(CIT)较E-S组短(279.2±74.7 vs 325.2±15.1 min);P = .023)。E-S组动脉重建时间和手术时间较E-S组短(21.0±3.6 min vs 51.0±9.1 min, P < 0.001;326.0±103.4 vs 422.7±24.6 min, P = .001)。E-S组耐药指数(RI)较低(0.5±0.3 vs 0.6±0.1);P = .049)。结论:两组动脉及胆道并发症无明显差异。GDA保存符合解剖和生理要求。E-S在肝动脉重建及RI时间上优于E-E。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of 2 Different Types of Arterial and Biliary Anastomoses While Preserving the Gastroduodenal Artery: A Retrospective Study.

Objective: Here we investigated 2 different arterial reconstruction procedures with preservation of the gastroduodenal artery (GDA) in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 40 pairs of donors and recipients who underwent OLT from May 2018 to August 2023 were analyzed. The GDA of all recipients was preserved during the hepatic arteries reconstruction, which were divided into 2 groups according to different anastomosis locations, namely the end-to-side group (E-S group, n = 17, Branch-patch between the common hepatic and the gastroduodenal artery) and end-to-end group (E-E group, n = 23, between common hepatic and proper hepatic).

Results: Demographics did not differ between both groups (P > .05). The warm ischemia time (WIT) was numerically longer in the E-S group (403.3 ± 103.3 vs 195.2 ± 35.8 s; P < .001), but the cold ischemia time (CIT) was numerically shorter in the E-S group (279.2 ± 74.7 vs 325.2 ± 15.1 min; P = .023). The time of artery reconstruction and duration of surgery was numerically shorter in the E-S group (21.0 ± 3.6 vs 51.0 ± 9.1 min, P < .001; 326.0 ± 103.4 vs 422.7 ± 24.6 min, P = .001). The E-S group had a lower resistance index (RI) (0.5 ± 0.3 vs 0.6 ± 0.1; P = .049).

Conclusion: Both groups showed no differences in artery and biliary complications. GDA preservation meets the anatomical and physiological requirements. E-S is superior to E-E by the time of hepatic artery reconstruction and RI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信