政府对不孕症治疗的补贴:对接受体外受精-胚胎移植的不孕妇女生活质量的影响。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Chih-Wei Lin, Yu-Hsien Wu, Pei-Fang Su, Yu-Lin Mau, Chun-Tzu Hsu, Huang-Tz Ou, Meng-Hsing Wu
{"title":"政府对不孕症治疗的补贴:对接受体外受精-胚胎移植的不孕妇女生活质量的影响。","authors":"Chih-Wei Lin, Yu-Hsien Wu, Pei-Fang Su, Yu-Lin Mau, Chun-Tzu Hsu, Huang-Tz Ou, Meng-Hsing Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.jfma.2024.11.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infertility and the economic burden of treatment can impose considerable psychosocial stress with negative consequences for the quality of life for all involved. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of government subsidies for infertility treatment on the quality of life among infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Infertile women undergoing in intro fertilization-embryo transfer were recruited from the Assisted Reproductive Technology Center at National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Taiwan, between 2019 and 2022. This study examined the issue of fertility using the FertiQoL survey, which measures the quality of life among individuals facing the struggles associated with infertility. Generalized estimating equation analysis was used to examine the relationship between government subsidies and pregnancy outcomes and quality of life following infertility treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study analyzed 497 infertile women with 727 embryo transfer cycles. The mean core domain and total FertiQoL scores of subsidy recipients were significantly higher (2.68 score increase, p = 0.026 and 2.38 score increase, p = 0.026, respectively) than those of women who did not receive a subsidy. We also observed a negative correlation between the provision of subsidies and the likelihood of clinical pregnancy (odds ratio = 0.57, 95% confidence interval: [0.35, 0.93], p = 0.03) and ongoing (odds ratio = 0.56, 95% confidence interval: [0.33, 0.95], p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The government subsidy for infertility treatment was negatively correlated with clinical and live birth rates while positively correlated with quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":17305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Government subsidy for infertility treatment: Impact on quality of life for infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.\",\"authors\":\"Chih-Wei Lin, Yu-Hsien Wu, Pei-Fang Su, Yu-Lin Mau, Chun-Tzu Hsu, Huang-Tz Ou, Meng-Hsing Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfma.2024.11.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infertility and the economic burden of treatment can impose considerable psychosocial stress with negative consequences for the quality of life for all involved. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of government subsidies for infertility treatment on the quality of life among infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Infertile women undergoing in intro fertilization-embryo transfer were recruited from the Assisted Reproductive Technology Center at National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Taiwan, between 2019 and 2022. This study examined the issue of fertility using the FertiQoL survey, which measures the quality of life among individuals facing the struggles associated with infertility. Generalized estimating equation analysis was used to examine the relationship between government subsidies and pregnancy outcomes and quality of life following infertility treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study analyzed 497 infertile women with 727 embryo transfer cycles. The mean core domain and total FertiQoL scores of subsidy recipients were significantly higher (2.68 score increase, p = 0.026 and 2.38 score increase, p = 0.026, respectively) than those of women who did not receive a subsidy. We also observed a negative correlation between the provision of subsidies and the likelihood of clinical pregnancy (odds ratio = 0.57, 95% confidence interval: [0.35, 0.93], p = 0.03) and ongoing (odds ratio = 0.56, 95% confidence interval: [0.33, 0.95], p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The government subsidy for infertility treatment was negatively correlated with clinical and live birth rates while positively correlated with quality of life.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2024.11.022\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2024.11.022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不孕症和治疗的经济负担可造成相当大的社会心理压力,对所有相关人员的生活质量产生负面影响。本研究的目的是确定政府对不孕症治疗的补贴对接受体外受精-胚胎移植的不孕症妇女生活质量的影响。​这项研究使用FertiQoL调查来研究生育问题,该调查衡量了与不孕有关的个人的生活质量。采用广义估计方程分析检验政府补贴与不孕症治疗后妊娠结局及生活质量的关系。结果:本研究分析了497名不孕妇女727个胚胎移植周期。领取补贴妇女的平均核心域和总FertiQoL得分显著高于未领取补贴妇女(分别增加2.68分,p = 0.026和2.38分,p = 0.026)。我们还观察到,提供补贴与临床妊娠可能性(优势比= 0.57,95%可信区间:[0.35,0.93],p = 0.03)和持续妊娠可能性(优势比= 0.56,95%可信区间:[0.33,0.95],p = 0.03)之间存在负相关。结论:政府对不孕症治疗的补贴与临床和活产率呈负相关,与生活质量呈正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Government subsidy for infertility treatment: Impact on quality of life for infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.

Background: Infertility and the economic burden of treatment can impose considerable psychosocial stress with negative consequences for the quality of life for all involved. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of government subsidies for infertility treatment on the quality of life among infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.

Methods: Infertile women undergoing in intro fertilization-embryo transfer were recruited from the Assisted Reproductive Technology Center at National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Taiwan, between 2019 and 2022. This study examined the issue of fertility using the FertiQoL survey, which measures the quality of life among individuals facing the struggles associated with infertility. Generalized estimating equation analysis was used to examine the relationship between government subsidies and pregnancy outcomes and quality of life following infertility treatment.

Results: This study analyzed 497 infertile women with 727 embryo transfer cycles. The mean core domain and total FertiQoL scores of subsidy recipients were significantly higher (2.68 score increase, p = 0.026 and 2.38 score increase, p = 0.026, respectively) than those of women who did not receive a subsidy. We also observed a negative correlation between the provision of subsidies and the likelihood of clinical pregnancy (odds ratio = 0.57, 95% confidence interval: [0.35, 0.93], p = 0.03) and ongoing (odds ratio = 0.56, 95% confidence interval: [0.33, 0.95], p = 0.03).

Conclusions: The government subsidy for infertility treatment was negatively correlated with clinical and live birth rates while positively correlated with quality of life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
381
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the Formosan Medical Association (JFMA), published continuously since 1902, is an open access international general medical journal of the Formosan Medical Association based in Taipei, Taiwan. It is indexed in Current Contents/ Clinical Medicine, Medline, ciSearch, CAB Abstracts, Embase, SIIC Data Bases, Research Alert, BIOSIS, Biological Abstracts, Scopus and ScienceDirect. As a general medical journal, research related to clinical practice and research in all fields of medicine and related disciplines are considered for publication. Article types considered include perspectives, reviews, original papers, case reports, brief communications, correspondence and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信