{"title":"打破车轮、可信度和解释学上的不公正:对哈里斯的回应。","authors":"Taylor Matthews","doi":"10.1007/s13347-024-00828-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this short paper, I respond to Keith Raymond Harris' paper \"Synthetic Media, The Wheel, and the Burden of Proof\". In particular, I examine his arguments against two prominent approaches employed to deal with synthetic media such as deepfakes and other GenAI content, namely, the \"reactive\" and \"proactive\" approaches. In the first part, I raise a worry about the problem Harris levels at the reactive approach, before providing a constructive way of expanding his worry regarding the proactive approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":39065,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy and Technology","volume":"37 4","pages":"138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607036/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breaking the Wheel, Credibility, and Hermeneutical Injustice: A Response to Harris.\",\"authors\":\"Taylor Matthews\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13347-024-00828-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this short paper, I respond to Keith Raymond Harris' paper \\\"Synthetic Media, The Wheel, and the Burden of Proof\\\". In particular, I examine his arguments against two prominent approaches employed to deal with synthetic media such as deepfakes and other GenAI content, namely, the \\\"reactive\\\" and \\\"proactive\\\" approaches. In the first part, I raise a worry about the problem Harris levels at the reactive approach, before providing a constructive way of expanding his worry regarding the proactive approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophy and Technology\",\"volume\":\"37 4\",\"pages\":\"138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607036/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophy and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00828-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00828-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在这篇短文中,我回应了Keith Raymond Harris的论文“合成媒体、车轮和举证责任”。特别是,我研究了他反对两种主要方法的论点,这些方法用于处理合成媒体,如深度伪造和其他GenAI内容,即“反应性”和“前瞻性”方法。在第一部分中,我提出了哈里斯对被动方法问题的担忧,然后提供了一种建设性的方法来扩展他对主动方法的担忧。
Breaking the Wheel, Credibility, and Hermeneutical Injustice: A Response to Harris.
In this short paper, I respond to Keith Raymond Harris' paper "Synthetic Media, The Wheel, and the Burden of Proof". In particular, I examine his arguments against two prominent approaches employed to deal with synthetic media such as deepfakes and other GenAI content, namely, the "reactive" and "proactive" approaches. In the first part, I raise a worry about the problem Harris levels at the reactive approach, before providing a constructive way of expanding his worry regarding the proactive approach.