正畸临时骨骼锚定装置周围的微生物菌群：系统综述

Q1 Medicine

Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.11.005

Navia Jose Paul, Haritha Pottipalli Sathyanarayana, Vignesh Kailasam

{"title":"正畸临时骨骼锚定装置周围的微生物菌群：系统综述","authors":"Navia Jose Paul, Haritha Pottipalli Sathyanarayana, Vignesh Kailasam","doi":"10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The oral cavity harbours distinct microorganisms, which create a unique microenvironment. These microorganisms might trigger inflammatory reactions in the host, potentially leading to inflammation that can question the stability of temporary skeletal anchorage devices(TSADs). This study aimed to systematically review the literature on the type of microorganisms around TSADs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A search of studies in six electronic databases – Cochrane Library, PubMed, OVID, Scopus, LILACS and Web of Science were performed until 30 May 2024 without any restriction in date or language of publication. The selection of articles was limited to studies evaluating the microorganisms around TSADs during orthodontic treatment. Two reviewers independently performed eligibility screening, study selection, and data extraction. The Newcastle Ottawa scale was used to assess the Risk of bias in all the included studies. Meta-analysis could not be performed because of the heterogeneity of the studies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 7020 articles, seven prospective studies were included for the qualitative analysis. Porphyromonas gingivalis and Treponema denticola were found around all TSADs used in orthodontic therapy. There was a significant difference in the type of microorganisms around successful and failed TSADs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There was an overall colonization of diverse microorganisms around TSADS. Failed TSADs showed greater Porphyromonas gingivalis, Parvimonas micra and facultative anaerobic enteric commensal Enterobacter.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16609,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research","volume":"15 1","pages":"Pages 25-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microbial flora surrounding orthodontic temporary skeletal anchorage devices: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Navia Jose Paul, Haritha Pottipalli Sathyanarayana, Vignesh Kailasam\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.11.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The oral cavity harbours distinct microorganisms, which create a unique microenvironment. These microorganisms might trigger inflammatory reactions in the host, potentially leading to inflammation that can question the stability of temporary skeletal anchorage devices(TSADs). This study aimed to systematically review the literature on the type of microorganisms around TSADs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A search of studies in six electronic databases – Cochrane Library, PubMed, OVID, Scopus, LILACS and Web of Science were performed until 30 May 2024 without any restriction in date or language of publication. The selection of articles was limited to studies evaluating the microorganisms around TSADs during orthodontic treatment. Two reviewers independently performed eligibility screening, study selection, and data extraction. The Newcastle Ottawa scale was used to assess the Risk of bias in all the included studies. Meta-analysis could not be performed because of the heterogeneity of the studies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 7020 articles, seven prospective studies were included for the qualitative analysis. Porphyromonas gingivalis and Treponema denticola were found around all TSADs used in orthodontic therapy. There was a significant difference in the type of microorganisms around successful and failed TSADs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There was an overall colonization of diverse microorganisms around TSADS. Failed TSADs showed greater Porphyromonas gingivalis, Parvimonas micra and facultative anaerobic enteric commensal Enterobacter.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 25-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426824001726\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426824001726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的口腔内有独特的微生物，形成独特的微环境。这些微生物可能会引发宿主的炎症反应，潜在地导致炎症，从而质疑临时骨骼锚固装置（TSADs）的稳定性。本研究旨在系统地综述有关TSADs周围微生物类型的文献。方法检索Cochrane Library、PubMed、OVID、Scopus、LILACS和Web of Science 6个电子数据库的研究，截止到2024年5月30日，不受发表日期和语言的限制。文章的选择仅限于评估正畸治疗期间TSADs周围微生物的研究。两名审稿人独立进行资格筛选、研究选择和数据提取。纽卡斯尔渥太华量表用于评估所有纳入研究的偏倚风险。由于研究的异质性，不能进行meta分析。结果从7020篇文献中纳入7项前瞻性研究进行定性分析。在正畸治疗中发现牙龈卟啉单胞菌和牙密螺旋体。成功和失败的TSADs周围的微生物类型有显著差异。结论TSADS周围有多种微生物的定殖。失败的TSADs显示较多的牙龈卟啉单胞菌、微细小单胞菌和兼性厌氧肠道共生肠杆菌。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Microbial flora surrounding orthodontic temporary skeletal anchorage devices: A systematic review

查看原文本刊更多论文

Microbial flora surrounding orthodontic temporary skeletal anchorage devices: A systematic review

Aim

The oral cavity harbours distinct microorganisms, which create a unique microenvironment. These microorganisms might trigger inflammatory reactions in the host, potentially leading to inflammation that can question the stability of temporary skeletal anchorage devices(TSADs). This study aimed to systematically review the literature on the type of microorganisms around TSADs.

Methods

A search of studies in six electronic databases – Cochrane Library, PubMed, OVID, Scopus, LILACS and Web of Science were performed until 30 May 2024 without any restriction in date or language of publication. The selection of articles was limited to studies evaluating the microorganisms around TSADs during orthodontic treatment. Two reviewers independently performed eligibility screening, study selection, and data extraction. The Newcastle Ottawa scale was used to assess the Risk of bias in all the included studies. Meta-analysis could not be performed because of the heterogeneity of the studies.

Results

From 7020 articles, seven prospective studies were included for the qualitative analysis. Porphyromonas gingivalis and Treponema denticola were found around all TSADs used in orthodontic therapy. There was a significant difference in the type of microorganisms around successful and failed TSADs.

Conclusions

There was an overall colonization of diverse microorganisms around TSADS. Failed TSADs showed greater Porphyromonas gingivalis, Parvimonas micra and facultative anaerobic enteric commensal Enterobacter.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology

CiteScore

4.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

133

审稿时长

167 days

期刊介绍： Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research (JOBCR)is the official journal of the Craniofacial Research Foundation (CRF). The journal aims to provide a common platform for both clinical and translational research and to promote interdisciplinary sciences in craniofacial region. JOBCR publishes content that includes diseases, injuries and defects in the head, neck, face, jaws and the hard and soft tissues of the mouth and jaws and face region; diagnosis and medical management of diseases specific to the orofacial tissues and of oral manifestations of systemic diseases; studies on identifying populations at risk of oral disease or in need of specific care, and comparing regional, environmental, social, and access similarities and differences in dental care between populations; diseases of the mouth and related structures like salivary glands, temporomandibular joints, facial muscles and perioral skin; biomedical engineering, tissue engineering and stem cells. The journal publishes reviews, commentaries, peer-reviewed original research articles, short communication, and case reports.