Gerardo La Monaca, Nicola Pranno, Susanna Annibali, Antonella Polimeni, Maria Paola Cristalli
{"title":"矿化脱水同种异体移植物和可吸收膜重建治疗种植体周围炎的10年随访:回顾性病例系列。","authors":"Gerardo La Monaca, Nicola Pranno, Susanna Annibali, Antonella Polimeni, Maria Paola Cristalli","doi":"10.1111/clr.14385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the 10-year clinical and radiographic outcomes of peri-implantitis intrabony defects treated with mineralized dehydrated bone allograft (MDBA) and resorbable membrane in patients undergoing a regular supportive peri-implant/periodontal therapy (STP).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The original study participants were 34 (34 defects). After mechanical debridement and chemical decontamination of implant surfaces, intrabony defects were filled with MDBA and covered by a resorbable membrane. Patients were enrolled in a maintenance program with a recall interval of 6 months. The primary outcome was the absence of additional marginal peri-implant bone loss ≥ 1.0 mm after surgery. The composite outcome was no additional marginal peri-implant bone loss ≥ 1.0 mm and the absence of probing depth (PD) ≥ 5 mm, bleeding on probing and suppuration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the original 34 implants, 20 completed the 10-year follow-up, and three failed. Related to the primary outcome, the mean peri-implant marginal bone level changed from 4.78 mm (SD 1.84) at baseline to 3.10 mm (SD 1.73) after surgery and 3.71 mm (SD 1.78) at the follow-up end point. According to the composite outcome for disease resolution, 19 of the 34 original implants were successfully treated at the 10-year follow-up with a statistically significant difference between 1 (31/34 implants) and 5 years (20/34 implants) (p = 0.003) and 1 and 10 years (p = 0.001) but not between 5 and 10 years (p = 1.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ten years after the reconstructive treatment, followed by regular SPT, the cumulative successful treatment rate, according to the primary and the composite outcomes, was 58% (20/34 implants) and 53% (19/34) implants, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A 10-Year Follow-Up of Reconstructive Treatment of Peri-Implantitis Using Mineralized Dehydrated Allograft and Resorbable Membrane: A Retrospective Case Series.\",\"authors\":\"Gerardo La Monaca, Nicola Pranno, Susanna Annibali, Antonella Polimeni, Maria Paola Cristalli\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/clr.14385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the 10-year clinical and radiographic outcomes of peri-implantitis intrabony defects treated with mineralized dehydrated bone allograft (MDBA) and resorbable membrane in patients undergoing a regular supportive peri-implant/periodontal therapy (STP).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The original study participants were 34 (34 defects). After mechanical debridement and chemical decontamination of implant surfaces, intrabony defects were filled with MDBA and covered by a resorbable membrane. Patients were enrolled in a maintenance program with a recall interval of 6 months. The primary outcome was the absence of additional marginal peri-implant bone loss ≥ 1.0 mm after surgery. The composite outcome was no additional marginal peri-implant bone loss ≥ 1.0 mm and the absence of probing depth (PD) ≥ 5 mm, bleeding on probing and suppuration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the original 34 implants, 20 completed the 10-year follow-up, and three failed. Related to the primary outcome, the mean peri-implant marginal bone level changed from 4.78 mm (SD 1.84) at baseline to 3.10 mm (SD 1.73) after surgery and 3.71 mm (SD 1.78) at the follow-up end point. According to the composite outcome for disease resolution, 19 of the 34 original implants were successfully treated at the 10-year follow-up with a statistically significant difference between 1 (31/34 implants) and 5 years (20/34 implants) (p = 0.003) and 1 and 10 years (p = 0.001) but not between 5 and 10 years (p = 1.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ten years after the reconstructive treatment, followed by regular SPT, the cumulative successful treatment rate, according to the primary and the composite outcomes, was 58% (20/34 implants) and 53% (19/34) implants, respectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oral Implants Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oral Implants Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14385\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14385","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评价矿化脱水同种异体骨移植(MDBA)和可吸收膜治疗常规种植周/牙周治疗(STP)患者种植周骨缺损10年的临床和影像学结果。材料与方法:原研究对象34例(缺损34例)。在机械清创和化学净化种植体表面后,骨内缺陷被MDBA填充并被可吸收膜覆盖。患者被纳入一个维持计划,回忆间隔为6个月。主要结果是术后无额外种植体周围边缘骨丢失≥1.0 mm。综合结果为无额外种植体周围边缘骨丢失≥1.0 mm,无探探深度(PD)≥5 mm,探探出血和化脓。结果:在最初的34个植入物中,20个完成了10年的随访,3个失败。与主要结局相关,平均种植体周围边缘骨水平从基线时的4.78 mm (SD 1.84)变化到手术后的3.10 mm (SD 1.73)和随访结束时的3.71 mm (SD 1.78)。根据疾病消退的综合结局,在10年随访中,34个原始种植体中有19个成功治疗,1年(31/34种植体)和5年(20/34种植体)(p = 0.003)以及1年和10年(p = 0.001)之间有统计学差异,但5年和10年之间无统计学差异(p = 1.000)。结论:重建治疗10年后,再进行常规的SPT治疗,根据主要和综合结果,累积治疗成功率分别为58%(20/34种植体)和53%(19/34种植体)。
A 10-Year Follow-Up of Reconstructive Treatment of Peri-Implantitis Using Mineralized Dehydrated Allograft and Resorbable Membrane: A Retrospective Case Series.
Objectives: To evaluate the 10-year clinical and radiographic outcomes of peri-implantitis intrabony defects treated with mineralized dehydrated bone allograft (MDBA) and resorbable membrane in patients undergoing a regular supportive peri-implant/periodontal therapy (STP).
Materials and methods: The original study participants were 34 (34 defects). After mechanical debridement and chemical decontamination of implant surfaces, intrabony defects were filled with MDBA and covered by a resorbable membrane. Patients were enrolled in a maintenance program with a recall interval of 6 months. The primary outcome was the absence of additional marginal peri-implant bone loss ≥ 1.0 mm after surgery. The composite outcome was no additional marginal peri-implant bone loss ≥ 1.0 mm and the absence of probing depth (PD) ≥ 5 mm, bleeding on probing and suppuration.
Results: Of the original 34 implants, 20 completed the 10-year follow-up, and three failed. Related to the primary outcome, the mean peri-implant marginal bone level changed from 4.78 mm (SD 1.84) at baseline to 3.10 mm (SD 1.73) after surgery and 3.71 mm (SD 1.78) at the follow-up end point. According to the composite outcome for disease resolution, 19 of the 34 original implants were successfully treated at the 10-year follow-up with a statistically significant difference between 1 (31/34 implants) and 5 years (20/34 implants) (p = 0.003) and 1 and 10 years (p = 0.001) but not between 5 and 10 years (p = 1.000).
Conclusions: Ten years after the reconstructive treatment, followed by regular SPT, the cumulative successful treatment rate, according to the primary and the composite outcomes, was 58% (20/34 implants) and 53% (19/34) implants, respectively.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.