治疗阴道分娩疼痛的镇痛处方的普遍性和有效性。

IF 1.2 Q3 NURSING
Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem Pub Date : 2024-11-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0327
Juan Ignacio Calcagno, Sarah Iribarren, Cristiane Flora Villarreal, Patricia Santos de Oliveira, Amado Nizarala de Ávila
{"title":"治疗阴道分娩疼痛的镇痛处方的普遍性和有效性。","authors":"Juan Ignacio Calcagno, Sarah Iribarren, Cristiane Flora Villarreal, Patricia Santos de Oliveira, Amado Nizarala de Ávila","doi":"10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>to assess pain management during labor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>a cross-sectional study was carried out by reviewing medical records and conducting postpartum interviews. Prevalence and effectiveness of analgesia were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>the prevalence of non-pharmacological analgesia was 61.86% of 215 women in labor in Obstetric Center and 82.51% of 62 in midwife-led unit. Prevalence of severe pain, on the Visual Analogue Scale, before and after non-pharmacological analgesia, was from 92.16% to 64.04% (p=0.00) in Obstetric Center and from 85.96% to 52.63% (p=0.01) in midwife-led unit. Prevalence of pharmacological analgesia in Obstetric Centers was 15.81%, with no variation in severe pain (p=0.57). Patients' request for analgesia was associated with education (p=0.00) and pain intensity (p=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>non-pharmacological analgesia improved pain intensity. Prevalence of pharmacological analgesic prescription was lower than that identified in developed countries. Pain management needs to consider the preferences and needs of women in labor.</p>","PeriodicalId":21200,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem","volume":"77 5","pages":"e20230327"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11653877/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of prescription and effectiveness of analgesia for treating vaginal delivery pain.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Ignacio Calcagno, Sarah Iribarren, Cristiane Flora Villarreal, Patricia Santos de Oliveira, Amado Nizarala de Ávila\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>to assess pain management during labor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>a cross-sectional study was carried out by reviewing medical records and conducting postpartum interviews. Prevalence and effectiveness of analgesia were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>the prevalence of non-pharmacological analgesia was 61.86% of 215 women in labor in Obstetric Center and 82.51% of 62 in midwife-led unit. Prevalence of severe pain, on the Visual Analogue Scale, before and after non-pharmacological analgesia, was from 92.16% to 64.04% (p=0.00) in Obstetric Center and from 85.96% to 52.63% (p=0.01) in midwife-led unit. Prevalence of pharmacological analgesia in Obstetric Centers was 15.81%, with no variation in severe pain (p=0.57). Patients' request for analgesia was associated with education (p=0.00) and pain intensity (p=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>non-pharmacological analgesia improved pain intensity. Prevalence of pharmacological analgesic prescription was lower than that identified in developed countries. Pain management needs to consider the preferences and needs of women in labor.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem\",\"volume\":\"77 5\",\"pages\":\"e20230327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11653877/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0327\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估分娩过程中的疼痛管理。方法:通过查阅病历和产后访谈进行横断面研究。结果:在产科中心的 215 名产妇中,非药物镇痛的使用率为 61.86%;在助产士主导的 62 名产妇中,非药物镇痛的使用率为 82.51%。非药物镇痛前后的视觉模拟量表显示,产科中心的剧痛发生率从92.16%降至64.04%(P=0.00),助产士主导单元的剧痛发生率从85.96%降至52.63%(P=0.01)。产科中心的药物镇痛率为 15.81%,剧烈疼痛率没有变化(p=0.57)。患者要求镇痛与教育程度(p=0.00)和疼痛强度(p=0.02)有关。结论:非药物镇痛可改善疼痛强度,药物镇痛处方的使用率低于发达国家。疼痛管理需要考虑产妇的偏好和需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence of prescription and effectiveness of analgesia for treating vaginal delivery pain.

Objectives: to assess pain management during labor.

Methods: a cross-sectional study was carried out by reviewing medical records and conducting postpartum interviews. Prevalence and effectiveness of analgesia were assessed.

Results: the prevalence of non-pharmacological analgesia was 61.86% of 215 women in labor in Obstetric Center and 82.51% of 62 in midwife-led unit. Prevalence of severe pain, on the Visual Analogue Scale, before and after non-pharmacological analgesia, was from 92.16% to 64.04% (p=0.00) in Obstetric Center and from 85.96% to 52.63% (p=0.01) in midwife-led unit. Prevalence of pharmacological analgesia in Obstetric Centers was 15.81%, with no variation in severe pain (p=0.57). Patients' request for analgesia was associated with education (p=0.00) and pain intensity (p=0.02).

Conclusions: non-pharmacological analgesia improved pain intensity. Prevalence of pharmacological analgesic prescription was lower than that identified in developed countries. Pain management needs to consider the preferences and needs of women in labor.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
477
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem created in 1932, March 20 is the official publication of the Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (Brazilian Nursing Association) has as purpose to disseminate the scientific production from different nursing interest areas of knowledge, including those which express the political project of the Association. The Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem is the oldest journal of the Brazilian nursing. Its first title was "Annaes de Enfermagem" from 1932 to 1941, being entitled Anais de Enfermagem" until 1955, when its title was changed to the current.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信