新型药球旋转力量测试的标准有效性和可靠性。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Sean G J Hardy, Oscar W Stelzer-Hiller, Kate M Edwards, Jonathan Freeston
{"title":"新型药球旋转力量测试的标准有效性和可靠性。","authors":"Sean G J Hardy, Oscar W Stelzer-Hiller, Kate M Edwards, Jonathan Freeston","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Hardy, SGJ, Stelzer-Hiller, OW, Edwards, KM, and Freeston, J. Criterion validity and reliability of a new medicine ball rotational power test. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-This study assessed the validity and reliability of 2 medicine ball rotational power assessments, the novel push for maximum velocity by radar (MBvel), and the commonly used push for maximum distance by tape measure (MBdis), against the criterion reference 3-dimensional motion capture (MoCap) to identify the best-practice field-based assessment. Fifteen professional female cricketers volunteered for 2 testing sessions each comprising of a specific warm-up and 24 (12 MBvel, 12 MBdis) maximal throws of a 2-kilogram medicine ball. Radar velocity and tape measure distance were compared with MoCap velocity and projectile motion calculated distance overall, and by dominant and nondominant sides. Statistical analysis included intraclass correlations (ICCs) for accuracy (1, 1) and reliability (3,1), Bland-Altman plots for bias precision and limits of agreement, linear regression (R2) for variance, and Pearson's (r) for correlation. Significance was set α = 0.05. MBvel demonstrated excellent accuracy (ICC = 0.97 [0.97-0.98]), and nearly perfect agreement for bias (-0.09%) and precision (1.49%). Side-to-side analysis showed the same profile for MBvel dominant (ICC = 0.96 [0.95-0.97], bias -0.15%, precision = 1.55%) and nondominant sides (ICC = 0.97 [0.96-0.98], bias -0.05%, precision = 1.53%). MBvel demonstrated excellent reliability overall (ICC = 0.94 [0.82-0.98]) for dominant (ICC = 0.88 [0.69-0.97]) and nondominant sides (ICC = 0.93 [0.80-0.98]). MBdis showed poor accuracy (ICC = 0.38 [0.28-0.47]), large bias (12.43%), lower precision (4.55%), and moderate reliability (ICC = 0.72 [0.32-0.90]). The MBvel assessment validly and reliably measures rotational power performance, enabling practitioners to profile, benchmark, and assess the quality in the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Criterion Validity and Reliability of a New Medicine Ball Rotational Power Test.\",\"authors\":\"Sean G J Hardy, Oscar W Stelzer-Hiller, Kate M Edwards, Jonathan Freeston\",\"doi\":\"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Hardy, SGJ, Stelzer-Hiller, OW, Edwards, KM, and Freeston, J. Criterion validity and reliability of a new medicine ball rotational power test. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-This study assessed the validity and reliability of 2 medicine ball rotational power assessments, the novel push for maximum velocity by radar (MBvel), and the commonly used push for maximum distance by tape measure (MBdis), against the criterion reference 3-dimensional motion capture (MoCap) to identify the best-practice field-based assessment. Fifteen professional female cricketers volunteered for 2 testing sessions each comprising of a specific warm-up and 24 (12 MBvel, 12 MBdis) maximal throws of a 2-kilogram medicine ball. Radar velocity and tape measure distance were compared with MoCap velocity and projectile motion calculated distance overall, and by dominant and nondominant sides. Statistical analysis included intraclass correlations (ICCs) for accuracy (1, 1) and reliability (3,1), Bland-Altman plots for bias precision and limits of agreement, linear regression (R2) for variance, and Pearson's (r) for correlation. Significance was set α = 0.05. MBvel demonstrated excellent accuracy (ICC = 0.97 [0.97-0.98]), and nearly perfect agreement for bias (-0.09%) and precision (1.49%). Side-to-side analysis showed the same profile for MBvel dominant (ICC = 0.96 [0.95-0.97], bias -0.15%, precision = 1.55%) and nondominant sides (ICC = 0.97 [0.96-0.98], bias -0.05%, precision = 1.53%). MBvel demonstrated excellent reliability overall (ICC = 0.94 [0.82-0.98]) for dominant (ICC = 0.88 [0.69-0.97]) and nondominant sides (ICC = 0.93 [0.80-0.98]). MBdis showed poor accuracy (ICC = 0.38 [0.28-0.47]), large bias (12.43%), lower precision (4.55%), and moderate reliability (ICC = 0.72 [0.32-0.90]). The MBvel assessment validly and reliably measures rotational power performance, enabling practitioners to profile, benchmark, and assess the quality in the field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005001\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:Hardy、SGJ、Stelzer-Hiller、OW、Edwards、KM 和 Freeston、J.新型药球旋转力量测试的标准有效性和可靠性。J Strength Cond Res XX(X):000-000,2024-这项研究对照三维运动捕捉(MoCap)标准参考,评估了两种药球旋转力量评估的有效性和可靠性,一种是新颖的雷达推最大速度(MBvel),另一种是常用的卷尺推最大距离(MBdis),以确定最佳的现场评估方法。15 名职业女子板球运动员自愿参加了 2 次测试,每次测试包括特定热身和 24 次(12 次 MBvel,12 次 MBdis)最大投掷 2 千克重的药球。将雷达速度和卷尺测量距离与 MoCap 速度和弹射运动计算距离进行比较,并按优势侧和非优势侧进行比较。统计分析包括准确性(1,1)和可靠性(3,1)的类内相关性(ICCs)、偏差精度和一致性限制的布兰-阿尔特曼图、方差的线性回归(R2)和相关性的皮尔逊(r)。显著性设定为 α = 0.05。MBvel 显示出极佳的准确性(ICC = 0.97 [0.97-0.98]),偏差(-0.09%)和精确度(1.49%)几乎完全一致。侧对侧分析显示 MBvel 优势侧(ICC = 0.96 [0.95-0.97],偏差 -0.15%,精确度 = 1.55%)和非优势侧(ICC = 0.97 [0.96-0.98],偏差 -0.05%,精确度 = 1.53%)的情况相同。MBvel在优势侧(ICC = 0.88 [0.69-0.97])和非优势侧(ICC = 0.93 [0.80-0.98])总体可靠性极佳(ICC = 0.94 [0.82-0.98])。MBdis 的准确性较差(ICC = 0.38 [0.28-0.47]),偏差较大(12.43%),精确度较低(4.55%),可靠性适中(ICC = 0.72 [0.32-0.90])。MBvel 评估有效、可靠地衡量了旋转能力表现,使从业人员能够在现场对质量进行剖析、基准设定和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Criterion Validity and Reliability of a New Medicine Ball Rotational Power Test.

Abstract: Hardy, SGJ, Stelzer-Hiller, OW, Edwards, KM, and Freeston, J. Criterion validity and reliability of a new medicine ball rotational power test. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-This study assessed the validity and reliability of 2 medicine ball rotational power assessments, the novel push for maximum velocity by radar (MBvel), and the commonly used push for maximum distance by tape measure (MBdis), against the criterion reference 3-dimensional motion capture (MoCap) to identify the best-practice field-based assessment. Fifteen professional female cricketers volunteered for 2 testing sessions each comprising of a specific warm-up and 24 (12 MBvel, 12 MBdis) maximal throws of a 2-kilogram medicine ball. Radar velocity and tape measure distance were compared with MoCap velocity and projectile motion calculated distance overall, and by dominant and nondominant sides. Statistical analysis included intraclass correlations (ICCs) for accuracy (1, 1) and reliability (3,1), Bland-Altman plots for bias precision and limits of agreement, linear regression (R2) for variance, and Pearson's (r) for correlation. Significance was set α = 0.05. MBvel demonstrated excellent accuracy (ICC = 0.97 [0.97-0.98]), and nearly perfect agreement for bias (-0.09%) and precision (1.49%). Side-to-side analysis showed the same profile for MBvel dominant (ICC = 0.96 [0.95-0.97], bias -0.15%, precision = 1.55%) and nondominant sides (ICC = 0.97 [0.96-0.98], bias -0.05%, precision = 1.53%). MBvel demonstrated excellent reliability overall (ICC = 0.94 [0.82-0.98]) for dominant (ICC = 0.88 [0.69-0.97]) and nondominant sides (ICC = 0.93 [0.80-0.98]). MBdis showed poor accuracy (ICC = 0.38 [0.28-0.47]), large bias (12.43%), lower precision (4.55%), and moderate reliability (ICC = 0.72 [0.32-0.90]). The MBvel assessment validly and reliably measures rotational power performance, enabling practitioners to profile, benchmark, and assess the quality in the field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信