治疗髓内钉术后股骨无菌性不连的置换钉与增强性钢板的比较研究:单盲、多中心随机临床试验。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mehdi Motififard, Hamid Mousavi, Nasrollah Iranpanah, Hossein Akbari Aghdam, Mehdi Teimouri, Mohsen Aliakbari, Mohammad Parhamfar, Somaye Shirazi Nejad, Mahdi Shahsavan, Amin Daemi, Ashkan Salehi, Mohammad Shahsavan
{"title":"治疗髓内钉术后股骨无菌性不连的置换钉与增强性钢板的比较研究:单盲、多中心随机临床试验。","authors":"Mehdi Motififard, Hamid Mousavi, Nasrollah Iranpanah, Hossein Akbari Aghdam, Mehdi Teimouri, Mohsen Aliakbari, Mohammad Parhamfar, Somaye Shirazi Nejad, Mahdi Shahsavan, Amin Daemi, Ashkan Salehi, Mohammad Shahsavan","doi":"10.3390/jcm13226928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Aseptic nonunion of femoral shafts after intramedullary nailing (IMN) can be a challenging condition that may lead to long-term disability and the need for multiple surgical procedures. This study compared the clinical and radiological outcomes between exchange nailing and augmentative plating with bone grafting. <b>Methods</b>: In this multicenter, prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial, patients with aseptic nonunion of the femoral shaft after IMN were randomly assigned to receive exchange nailing or augmentative plating. The primary outcomes measured were the time to bone union and union rate 12 months after revision surgery. The secondary outcomes included operative time, blood loss, hospitalization duration, pain level using the visual analog scale (VAS), knee range of motion (ROM), and complication rates. <b>Results:</b> The augmentative plating group had a significantly shorter mean time to union (5.39 ± 1.29 months) compared with the exchange nailing group (7.38 ± 1.97 months; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The union rates at 12 months were 100% in the augmentative plating group and 89.65% in the exchange nail group. Augmentative plating resulted in a shorter operation time (99.46 ± 11.08 min vs. 106.45 ± 12.22 min; <i>p</i> = 0.025) and reduced blood loss (514.79 ± 45.87 mL vs. 547.72 ± 54.35 mL; <i>p</i> = 0.016). Significant pain reduction was observed in the augmentative plating group, with preoperative VAS scores decreasing from 6.04 ± 2.28 to 2.64 ± 1.50, compared with a decrease from 5.66 ± 2.21 to 3.66 ± 2.19 in the exchange nailing group (<i>p</i> = 0.047). Knee ROM improved significantly in the augmentative plating group (<i>p</i> = 0.0176). The complication rate was lower in the augmentative plating group (3.57%) than in the exchange nail group (17.24%). <b>Conclusions</b>: Augmentative plating with autologous bone grafting is superior to exchange nailing for treating aseptic nonunion of femoral shafts. It is associated with faster healing, higher union rates, better clinical and functional outcomes, and fewer complications. We recommend this technique as the preferred treatment option for such complex cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"13 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Exchange Nailing and Augmentative Plating for Treating Aseptic Nonunion of Femoral Shafts Post Intramedullary Nailing: A Single-Blind, Multicentric Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Mehdi Motififard, Hamid Mousavi, Nasrollah Iranpanah, Hossein Akbari Aghdam, Mehdi Teimouri, Mohsen Aliakbari, Mohammad Parhamfar, Somaye Shirazi Nejad, Mahdi Shahsavan, Amin Daemi, Ashkan Salehi, Mohammad Shahsavan\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcm13226928\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Aseptic nonunion of femoral shafts after intramedullary nailing (IMN) can be a challenging condition that may lead to long-term disability and the need for multiple surgical procedures. This study compared the clinical and radiological outcomes between exchange nailing and augmentative plating with bone grafting. <b>Methods</b>: In this multicenter, prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial, patients with aseptic nonunion of the femoral shaft after IMN were randomly assigned to receive exchange nailing or augmentative plating. The primary outcomes measured were the time to bone union and union rate 12 months after revision surgery. The secondary outcomes included operative time, blood loss, hospitalization duration, pain level using the visual analog scale (VAS), knee range of motion (ROM), and complication rates. <b>Results:</b> The augmentative plating group had a significantly shorter mean time to union (5.39 ± 1.29 months) compared with the exchange nailing group (7.38 ± 1.97 months; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The union rates at 12 months were 100% in the augmentative plating group and 89.65% in the exchange nail group. Augmentative plating resulted in a shorter operation time (99.46 ± 11.08 min vs. 106.45 ± 12.22 min; <i>p</i> = 0.025) and reduced blood loss (514.79 ± 45.87 mL vs. 547.72 ± 54.35 mL; <i>p</i> = 0.016). Significant pain reduction was observed in the augmentative plating group, with preoperative VAS scores decreasing from 6.04 ± 2.28 to 2.64 ± 1.50, compared with a decrease from 5.66 ± 2.21 to 3.66 ± 2.19 in the exchange nailing group (<i>p</i> = 0.047). Knee ROM improved significantly in the augmentative plating group (<i>p</i> = 0.0176). The complication rate was lower in the augmentative plating group (3.57%) than in the exchange nail group (17.24%). <b>Conclusions</b>: Augmentative plating with autologous bone grafting is superior to exchange nailing for treating aseptic nonunion of femoral shafts. It is associated with faster healing, higher union rates, better clinical and functional outcomes, and fewer complications. We recommend this technique as the preferred treatment option for such complex cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"13 22\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226928\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226928","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:髓内钉(IMN)术后股骨干无菌性不连是一种具有挑战性的病症,可能导致长期残疾并需要多次手术治疗。本研究比较了交换钉和植骨增强钢板之间的临床和放射学结果。方法:在这项多中心、前瞻性、单盲、随机对照试验中,IMN后股骨无菌性骨不连患者被随机分配接受交换钉或增强钢板固定。测量的主要结果是骨结合时间和翻修手术后 12 个月的骨结合率。次要结果包括手术时间、失血量、住院时间、视觉模拟量表(VAS)显示的疼痛程度、膝关节活动范围(ROM)和并发症发生率。结果显示与交换钉组(7.38 ± 1.97 个月;P < 0.001)相比,增强钢板组的平均愈合时间(5.39 ± 1.29 个月)明显更短。增强钢板组 12 个月的骨结合率为 100%,交换钉组的骨结合率为 89.65%。增强钢板组的手术时间更短(99.46 ± 11.08 分钟 vs 106.45 ± 12.22 分钟;p = 0.025),失血量更少(514.79 ± 45.87 mL vs 547.72 ± 54.35 mL;p = 0.016)。增强钢板组的疼痛明显减轻,术前VAS评分从(6.04 ± 2.28)降低到(2.64 ± 1.50),而交换钉组的评分从(5.66 ± 2.21)降低到(3.66 ± 2.19)(P = 0.047)。增强型钢板组的膝关节活动度明显改善(p = 0.0176)。增强钢板组的并发症发生率(3.57%)低于交换钉组(17.24%)。结论在治疗股骨干无菌性不连时,使用自体骨移植的增强钢板优于交换钉。它的愈合速度更快,骨结合率更高,临床和功能效果更好,并发症更少。我们建议将此技术作为此类复杂病例的首选治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Study of Exchange Nailing and Augmentative Plating for Treating Aseptic Nonunion of Femoral Shafts Post Intramedullary Nailing: A Single-Blind, Multicentric Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: Aseptic nonunion of femoral shafts after intramedullary nailing (IMN) can be a challenging condition that may lead to long-term disability and the need for multiple surgical procedures. This study compared the clinical and radiological outcomes between exchange nailing and augmentative plating with bone grafting. Methods: In this multicenter, prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial, patients with aseptic nonunion of the femoral shaft after IMN were randomly assigned to receive exchange nailing or augmentative plating. The primary outcomes measured were the time to bone union and union rate 12 months after revision surgery. The secondary outcomes included operative time, blood loss, hospitalization duration, pain level using the visual analog scale (VAS), knee range of motion (ROM), and complication rates. Results: The augmentative plating group had a significantly shorter mean time to union (5.39 ± 1.29 months) compared with the exchange nailing group (7.38 ± 1.97 months; p < 0.001). The union rates at 12 months were 100% in the augmentative plating group and 89.65% in the exchange nail group. Augmentative plating resulted in a shorter operation time (99.46 ± 11.08 min vs. 106.45 ± 12.22 min; p = 0.025) and reduced blood loss (514.79 ± 45.87 mL vs. 547.72 ± 54.35 mL; p = 0.016). Significant pain reduction was observed in the augmentative plating group, with preoperative VAS scores decreasing from 6.04 ± 2.28 to 2.64 ± 1.50, compared with a decrease from 5.66 ± 2.21 to 3.66 ± 2.19 in the exchange nailing group (p = 0.047). Knee ROM improved significantly in the augmentative plating group (p = 0.0176). The complication rate was lower in the augmentative plating group (3.57%) than in the exchange nail group (17.24%). Conclusions: Augmentative plating with autologous bone grafting is superior to exchange nailing for treating aseptic nonunion of femoral shafts. It is associated with faster healing, higher union rates, better clinical and functional outcomes, and fewer complications. We recommend this technique as the preferred treatment option for such complex cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信