深部脑刺激治疗慢性难治性丛集性头痛:关于长期疗效和连接性分析的系列病例。

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Headache Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1111/head.14875
Juan Ángel Aibar-Durán, Nerea González, Rosa M Mirapeix, Noemi Morollón Sánchez-Mateos, Clara Roig Arsequell, Maria Borrell Pichot, Robert Belvís Nieto, Gemma Piella Fenoy, Cristian de Quintana Schmidt, Fernando Muñoz Hernandez, Fernando Seijoo Fernández, Rodrigo Rodríguez Rodríguez
{"title":"深部脑刺激治疗慢性难治性丛集性头痛:关于长期疗效和连接性分析的系列病例。","authors":"Juan Ángel Aibar-Durán, Nerea González, Rosa M Mirapeix, Noemi Morollón Sánchez-Mateos, Clara Roig Arsequell, Maria Borrell Pichot, Robert Belvís Nieto, Gemma Piella Fenoy, Cristian de Quintana Schmidt, Fernando Muñoz Hernandez, Fernando Seijoo Fernández, Rodrigo Rodríguez Rodríguez","doi":"10.1111/head.14875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to provide long-term clinical results-including \"sweet spot\" identification and connectomic imaging analysis-in a series of patients treated with deep brain stimulation for refractory chronic cluster headache.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep brain stimulation is a relatively recent indication for the treatment of refractory chronic cluster headache. This indication has generated substantial debate in recent years due to uncertainty surrounding the mechanism of action and the lack of long-term efficacy data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Case retrospective series of adult patients diagnosed with refractory chronic cluster headache and treated with deep brain stimulation. Demographic and clinical data were registered preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. The primary endpoint was reduction in headache load, a composite score of frequency, severity, and duration of each attack. Imaging analyses (sweet spot and connectomic analyses) were performed to identify the brain regions most closely correlated with the reduction in headache load and to identify the structural networks involved. Treatment response was categorized according to the reduction in headache load, as follows: poor (<30% reduction), partial (30-50%), or high (>50%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 patients were included, with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 42.4 (10.7) years and mean (SD) headache duration of 8.0 (5.8) years. Headache load scores decreased significantly from baseline to Month 24: mean (SD) 424.2 (325.9) versus 135.9 (155.7) (p = 0.001). In most patients (eight patients [58.0%]), headache load scores decreased by 50% after treatment. The other six patients showed either a partial (three [21.0%]) or poor (three [21.0%]) response. The optimized sweet spot was the lateral ventral tegmental area ((Montreal Neurological Institute) MNI coordinates of the center of mass: x = ± 9.0 mm, y = -10.6 mm, z = -3.5 mm). The connectomic analysis pointed to the probable implication of corticorubral tracts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that a substantial proportion of patients with refractory chronic cluster headache obtain significant long-term clinical benefits from deep brain stimulation. Good responders were characterized by a robust improvement in headache load within 3-6 months after surgery. The lateral ventral tegmental area was identified as the best target for this indication, with the likely participation of corticorubral tracts.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep brain stimulation for chronic refractory cluster headache: A case series about long-term outcomes and connectivity analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Ángel Aibar-Durán, Nerea González, Rosa M Mirapeix, Noemi Morollón Sánchez-Mateos, Clara Roig Arsequell, Maria Borrell Pichot, Robert Belvís Nieto, Gemma Piella Fenoy, Cristian de Quintana Schmidt, Fernando Muñoz Hernandez, Fernando Seijoo Fernández, Rodrigo Rodríguez Rodríguez\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/head.14875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to provide long-term clinical results-including \\\"sweet spot\\\" identification and connectomic imaging analysis-in a series of patients treated with deep brain stimulation for refractory chronic cluster headache.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep brain stimulation is a relatively recent indication for the treatment of refractory chronic cluster headache. This indication has generated substantial debate in recent years due to uncertainty surrounding the mechanism of action and the lack of long-term efficacy data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Case retrospective series of adult patients diagnosed with refractory chronic cluster headache and treated with deep brain stimulation. Demographic and clinical data were registered preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. The primary endpoint was reduction in headache load, a composite score of frequency, severity, and duration of each attack. Imaging analyses (sweet spot and connectomic analyses) were performed to identify the brain regions most closely correlated with the reduction in headache load and to identify the structural networks involved. Treatment response was categorized according to the reduction in headache load, as follows: poor (<30% reduction), partial (30-50%), or high (>50%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 patients were included, with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 42.4 (10.7) years and mean (SD) headache duration of 8.0 (5.8) years. Headache load scores decreased significantly from baseline to Month 24: mean (SD) 424.2 (325.9) versus 135.9 (155.7) (p = 0.001). In most patients (eight patients [58.0%]), headache load scores decreased by 50% after treatment. The other six patients showed either a partial (three [21.0%]) or poor (three [21.0%]) response. The optimized sweet spot was the lateral ventral tegmental area ((Montreal Neurological Institute) MNI coordinates of the center of mass: x = ± 9.0 mm, y = -10.6 mm, z = -3.5 mm). The connectomic analysis pointed to the probable implication of corticorubral tracts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that a substantial proportion of patients with refractory chronic cluster headache obtain significant long-term clinical benefits from deep brain stimulation. Good responders were characterized by a robust improvement in headache load within 3-6 months after surgery. The lateral ventral tegmental area was identified as the best target for this indication, with the likely participation of corticorubral tracts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Headache\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Headache\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14875\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14875","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究的目的是提供一系列接受脑深部刺激治疗难治性慢性丛集性头痛患者的长期临床结果,包括 "甜点 "识别和连接组成像分析:背景:脑深部刺激是治疗难治性慢性丛集性头痛的较新适应症。背景:脑深部刺激是治疗难治性慢性丛集性头痛的一个相对较新的适应症,由于其作用机制的不确定性和缺乏长期疗效数据,该适应症近年来引起了广泛的争论:方法:对诊断为难治性慢性丛集性头痛并接受脑深部刺激治疗的成年患者进行病例回顾性系列研究。方法:对确诊为难治性慢性丛集性头痛并接受脑深部刺激治疗的成年患者进行病例回顾性系列研究,登记术前以及3、6、12和24个月的人口统计学和临床数据。主要终点是减轻头痛负荷,即每次发作的频率、严重程度和持续时间的综合评分。通过成像分析(甜点分析和连接组学分析)确定与头痛负荷减轻最密切相关的脑区,并确定相关的结构网络。根据头痛负荷的减轻程度对治疗反应进行分类,结果如下:差(50%):共纳入 14 名患者,平均(标准差 [SD])年龄为 42.4(10.7)岁,平均(标准差)头痛持续时间为 8.0(5.8)年。从基线到第 24 个月,头痛负荷评分明显降低:平均(标准差)424.2 (325.9) 对 135.9 (155.7) (p = 0.001)。大多数患者(8 人 [58.0%])的头痛负荷评分在治疗后降低了 50%。其他六名患者则表现出部分反应(三人 [21.0%])或不良反应(三人 [21.0%])。优化的甜点是侧腹被盖区((蒙特利尔神经研究所)MNI 质心坐标:x = ± 9.0 mm,y = -10.6 mm,z = -3.5 mm)。连接组学分析表明,皮质ubral束可能受到影响:这些研究结果表明,相当一部分难治性慢性丛集性头痛患者可从脑深部刺激中获得显著的长期临床疗效。反应良好者的特点是在术后 3-6 个月内头痛负荷得到明显改善。外侧腹侧被盖区被确定为这一适应症的最佳靶点,皮质ubral束也可能参与其中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep brain stimulation for chronic refractory cluster headache: A case series about long-term outcomes and connectivity analysis.

Objective: The aim of this study was to provide long-term clinical results-including "sweet spot" identification and connectomic imaging analysis-in a series of patients treated with deep brain stimulation for refractory chronic cluster headache.

Background: Deep brain stimulation is a relatively recent indication for the treatment of refractory chronic cluster headache. This indication has generated substantial debate in recent years due to uncertainty surrounding the mechanism of action and the lack of long-term efficacy data.

Methods: Case retrospective series of adult patients diagnosed with refractory chronic cluster headache and treated with deep brain stimulation. Demographic and clinical data were registered preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. The primary endpoint was reduction in headache load, a composite score of frequency, severity, and duration of each attack. Imaging analyses (sweet spot and connectomic analyses) were performed to identify the brain regions most closely correlated with the reduction in headache load and to identify the structural networks involved. Treatment response was categorized according to the reduction in headache load, as follows: poor (<30% reduction), partial (30-50%), or high (>50%).

Results: A total of 14 patients were included, with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 42.4 (10.7) years and mean (SD) headache duration of 8.0 (5.8) years. Headache load scores decreased significantly from baseline to Month 24: mean (SD) 424.2 (325.9) versus 135.9 (155.7) (p = 0.001). In most patients (eight patients [58.0%]), headache load scores decreased by 50% after treatment. The other six patients showed either a partial (three [21.0%]) or poor (three [21.0%]) response. The optimized sweet spot was the lateral ventral tegmental area ((Montreal Neurological Institute) MNI coordinates of the center of mass: x = ± 9.0 mm, y = -10.6 mm, z = -3.5 mm). The connectomic analysis pointed to the probable implication of corticorubral tracts.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that a substantial proportion of patients with refractory chronic cluster headache obtain significant long-term clinical benefits from deep brain stimulation. Good responders were characterized by a robust improvement in headache load within 3-6 months after surgery. The lateral ventral tegmental area was identified as the best target for this indication, with the likely participation of corticorubral tracts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Headache
Headache 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Headache publishes original articles on all aspects of head and face pain including communications on clinical and basic research, diagnosis and management, epidemiology, genetics, and pathophysiology of primary and secondary headaches, cranial neuralgias, and pains referred to the head and face. Monthly issues feature case reports, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, and news items regarding AHS plus medicolegal and socioeconomic aspects of head pain. This is the official journal of the American Headache Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信